IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/hcarem/v17y2014i1p77-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prioritization strategies for patient evacuations

Author

Listed:
  • Ashley Childers
  • Maria Mayorga
  • Kevin Taaffe

Abstract

Evacuation from a health care facility is considered last resort, and in the event of a complete evacuation, a standard planning assumption is that all patients will be evacuated. A literature review of the suggested prioritization strategies for evacuation planning—as well as the transportation priorities used in actual facility evacuations—shows a lack of consensus about whether critical or non-critical care patients should be transferred first. In addition, it is implied that these policies are “greedy” in that one patient group is given priority, and patients from that group are chosen to be completely evacuated before any patients are evacuated from the other group. The purpose of this paper is to present a dynamic programming model for emergency patient evacuations and show that a greedy, “all-or-nothing” policy is not always optimal as well as discuss insights of the resulting optimal prioritization strategies for unit- or floor-level evacuations. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Ashley Childers & Maria Mayorga & Kevin Taaffe, 2014. "Prioritization strategies for patient evacuations," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 77-87, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:77-87
    DOI: 10.1007/s10729-013-9236-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10729-013-9236-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10729-013-9236-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evin Uzun Jacobson & Nilay Tanık Argon & Serhan Ziya, 2012. "Priority Assignment in Emergency Response," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 813-832, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. O. H. Salman & A. A. Zaidan & B. B. Zaidan & Naserkalid & M. Hashim, 2017. "Novel Methodology for Triage and Prioritizing Using “Big Data” Patients with Chronic Heart Diseases Through Telemedicine Environmental," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(05), pages 1211-1245, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Kamali, Behrooz & Bish, Douglas & Glick, Roger, 2017. "Optimal service order for mass-casualty incident response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 355-367.
    3. Emmett J. Lodree & Nezih Altay & Robert A. Cook, 2019. "Staff assignment policies for a mass casualty event queuing network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 411-442, December.
    4. Rezapour, Shabnam & Naderi, Nazanin & Morshedlou, Nazanin & Rezapourbehnagh, Shaghayegh, 2018. "Optimal deployment of emergency resources in sudden onset disasters," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 365-382.
    5. Li Zhu & Yeming Gong & Yishui Xu & Jun Gu, 2019. "Emergency Relief Routing Models for Injured Victims Considering Equity and Priority," Post-Print hal-02879681, HAL.
    6. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Xueping Li & Shanlin Yang, 2023. "Ambulance dispatching and operating room scheduling considering reusable resources in mass-casualty incidents," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1-37, June.
    7. Sung, Inkyung & Lee, Taesik, 2016. "Optimal allocation of emergency medical resources in a mass casualty incident: Patient prioritization by column generation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 623-634.
    8. Alex F. Mills & Nilay Tanık Argon & Serhan Ziya, 2013. "Resource-Based Patient Prioritization in Mass-Casualty Incidents," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 361-377, July.
    9. Yoon, Soovin & Albert, Laura A., 2021. "Dynamic dispatch policies for emergency response with multiple types of vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Zhongzhen Yang & Liquan Guo & Zaili Yang, 2019. "Emergency logistics for wildfire suppression based on forecasted disaster evolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 917-937, December.
    11. Dong Li & Li Ding & Stephen Connor, 2020. "When to Switch? Index Policies for Resource Scheduling in Emergency Response," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 241-262, February.
    12. Carlo Drago & Matteo Ruggeri, 2019. "Setting research priorities in the field of emergency management: which piece of information are you willing to pay more?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 2103-2115, July.
    13. Li Zhu & Yeming Gong & Yishui Xu & Jun Gu, 2019. "Emergency relief routing models for injured victims considering equity and priority," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1573-1606, December.
    14. Yu Wang & Yu Zhang & Minglong Zhou & Jiafu Tang, 2023. "Feature‐driven robust surgery scheduling," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1921-1938, June.
    15. Eugene Furman & Adam Diamant & Murat Kristal, 2021. "Customer Acquisition and Retention: A Fluid Approach for Staffing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4236-4257, November.
    16. Saed Alizamir & Francis de Véricourt & Shouqiang Wang, 2020. "Warning Against Recurring Risks: An Information Design Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4612-4629, October.
    17. Lee, Hyun-Rok & Lee, Taesik, 2021. "Multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithm to solve a partially-observable multi-agent problem in disaster response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 296-308.
    18. Jiaxuan Zhang & Suogang Gao & Bo Hou & Wen Liu, 2023. "An approximation algorithm for the clustered path travelling salesman problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1-12, May.
    19. Vosooghi, Zeinab & Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S.M.J. & Lahijanian, Behshad, 2022. "Scenario-based redesigning of a relief supply-chain network by considering humanitarian constraints, triage, and volunteers’ help," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    20. Liu, Jia & Bai, Jinyu & Wu, Desheng, 2021. "Medical supplies scheduling in major public health emergencies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:77-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.