IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/copoec/v30y2019i1d10.1007_s10602-019-09275-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metaphysical justification for an economic constitution? Franz Böhm and the concept of natural law

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Nientiedt

    (Walter Eucken Institut)

Abstract

The paper analyzes references to the concept of natural law in the work of legal scholar Franz Böhm (1895–1977), one of the founders of German ordoliberalism and a pioneer in working at the intersection of law and economics. Böhm was particularly interested in the economic constitution, the framework of legal rules that shape economic transactions. It is shown that Böhm’s work on this subject relates to natural law in two distinct ways. Firstly, from classical political economy, he adopts the argument that there are patterns in human behavior that allow for the establishment of a self-organizing mechanism that governs economic activity, a social order “bestowed by nature” or “ordo”. Secondly, given the distinction in jurisprudence between legal positivists and natural law theorists, the paper argues that Böhm should be viewed as the latter because he maintains that legal norms need to correspond to justice in order to be valid law. Despite his status as a natural law theorist, Böhm contends that legal systems must not be derived from metaphysical sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Nientiedt, 2019. "Metaphysical justification for an economic constitution? Franz Böhm and the concept of natural law," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 114-129, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:copoec:v:30:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10602-019-09275-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10602-019-09275-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10602-019-09275-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10602-019-09275-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herzog, Lisa, 2013. "Inventing the Market: Smith, Hegel, and Political Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199674176, Decembrie.
    2. Feld, Lars P. & Köhler, Ekkehard A. & Nientiedt, Daniel, 2015. "Ordoliberalism, pragmatism and the eurozone crisis: How the German tradition shaped economic policy in Europe," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 15/04, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    3. Müller Christian, 2015. "Das Naturrecht in der Wirtschafts- und Sozialethik: Bemerkungen zu einem von Herbert Pribyl und Christian Machek herausgegebenen Tagungsband," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 66(1), pages 411-415, January.
    4. Daniel Nientiedt & Ekkehard A. Köhler, 2016. "Liberalism and democracy — a comparative reading of Eucken and Hayek," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 40(6), pages 1743-1760.
    5. Buchanan, James M, 1988. "Contractarian Political Economy and Constitutional Interpretation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(2), pages 135-139, May.
    6. Lars P. Feld & Gebhard Kirchgässner, 2003. "The Role of Direct Democracy in the European Union," CESifo Working Paper Series 1083, CESifo.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefano Figuera & Andrea Pacella, 2021. "La teoria euckeniana della moneta: spunti per una riflessione critica (Eucken's theory of money: ideas for critical reflection)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 74(296), pages 275-299.
    2. Daniel Nientiedt, 2021. "Hayek’s treatment of legal positivism," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 563-576, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feld, Lars P. & Köhler, Ekkehard A. & Nientiedt, Daniel, 2021. "Ordoliberalism and the social market economy," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 21/5, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    2. Jörg Bibow, 2018. "How Germany’s anti-Keynesianism has brought Europe to its knees," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 569-588, September.
    3. Simon Hug & Tobias Schulz, 2007. "Referendums in the EU’s constitution building process," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 177-218, June.
    4. Jan Schnellenbach, 2023. "The concept of Ordnungspolitik: rule-based economic policymaking from the perspective of the Freiburg School," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 283-300, June.
    5. Stephan Puehringer, 2021. "Zur Pluralitaet der oekonomischen Politikberatung in Deutschland," ICAE Working Papers 132, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
    6. Marciano, Alain, 2011. "Buchanan on externalities: An exercise in applied subjectivism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 280-289.
    7. Malte Dold & Tim Krieger, 2023. "The ideological use and abuse of Freiburg’s ordoliberalism," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 341-361, June.
    8. Niclas Berggren & Jerg Gutmann, 2020. "Securing personal freedom through institutions: the role of electoral democracy and judicial independence," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 165-186, April.
    9. Pies, Ingo, 2014. "Die Gerechtigkeitsdebatte in Deutschland: Diskursversagen beim Mindestlohn," Discussion Papers 2014-18, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    10. Lars P. Feld & Ekkehard A. Köhler, 2023. "Standing on the shoulders of giants or science? Lessons from ordoliberalism," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 197-211, June.
    11. Bruno S. Frey & Alois Stutzer, "undated". "Direct Democracy: Designing a Living Constitution," IEW - Working Papers 167, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    12. Kolev Stefan & Goldschmidt Nils, 2018. "Neoliberalism as the Ideology of Depolitization? Eucken and Hayek Reconsidered: Comments on the books by Jakob Friedrich Scherer and Clemens Reichhold," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 69(1), pages 518-522, July.
    13. Frey, Bruno S., 2004. "Direct Democracy for a Living Constitution," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 04/5, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    14. Kirchgaessner, Gebhard, 2015. "Direct Democracy: Chances and Challenges," Economics Working Paper Series 1513, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    15. Gebhard Kirchgässner, 2010. "Direkte Demokratie," CREMA Working Paper Series 2010-16, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    16. George K. Zestos & Harrison Whittleton & Alejandro Fernandez-Ribas, 2022. "Reflections on Angela Merkel's Career as Chancellor of Germany and the Greek Financial Odyssey," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_1010, Levy Economics Institute.
    17. Pies, Ingo, 2004. "Wirtschaftsethik als Beitrag zur Ordnungspolitik: Ein interdisziplinäres Forschungsprogramm demokratischer Politikberatung," Discussion Papers 2004-5, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    18. Kremser Christian E. W., 2018. "Positive Wirtschaftsanalyse oder normativer Wirtschaftsentwurf?: Adam Smiths kommerzielle Gesellschaft als wirtschaftspolitische Utopie," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 67(2), pages 219-245, August.
    19. Schneider, Friedrich G., 2009. "Is a Federal European Constitution for an enlarged European Union necessary? Some preliminary suggestions using public choice analysis," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 83, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    20. Friedrich Schneider, 2023. "Is a Minimal Federal European Constitution for the European Union Necessary? Some Preliminary Suggestions Using Public Choice Analysis," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 61-78, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Natural law; Legal positivism; Ordoliberalism; Social market economy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B20 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - General
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • H10 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - General
    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:copoec:v:30:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10602-019-09275-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.