IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v63y2024i4d10.1007_s10614-023-10370-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the Likelihood of Financial Behaviours Using Nearest Neighbors

Author

Listed:
  • Tiago Mendes-Neves

    (LIAAD-INESC TEC - Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support
    FEUP - Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto)

  • Diogo Seca

    (LIAAD-INESC TEC - Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support)

  • Ricardo Sousa

    (LIAAD-INESC TEC - Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support)

  • Cláudia Ribeiro

    (cefUP - Centro de Economias e Finanças da UP
    FEP - Faculdade de Economia da Universidade do Porto)

  • João Mendes-Moreira

    (LIAAD-INESC TEC - Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support
    FEUP - Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto)

Abstract

As many automated algorithms find their way into the IT systems of the banking sector, having a way to validate and interpret the results from these algorithms can lead to a substantial reduction in the risks associated with automation. Usually, validating these pricing mechanisms requires human resources to manually analyze and validate large quantities of data. There is a lack of effective methods that analyze the time series and understand if what is currently happening is plausible based on previous data, without information about the variables used to calculate the price of the asset. This paper describes an implementation of a process that allows us to validate many data points automatically. We explore the K-Nearest Neighbors algorithm to find coincident patterns in financial time series, allowing us to detect anomalies, outliers, and data points that do not follow normal behavior. This system allows quicker detection of defective calculations that would otherwise result in the incorrect pricing of financial assets. Furthermore, our method does not require knowledge about the variables used to calculate the time series being analyzed. Our proposal uses pattern matching and can validate more than 58% of instances, substantially improving human risk analysts’ efficiency. The proposal is completely transparent, allowing analysts to understand how the algorithm made its decision, increasing the trustworthiness of the method.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiago Mendes-Neves & Diogo Seca & Ricardo Sousa & Cláudia Ribeiro & João Mendes-Moreira, 2024. "Estimating the Likelihood of Financial Behaviours Using Nearest Neighbors," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 1477-1491, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:63:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10614-023-10370-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-023-10370-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-023-10370-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-023-10370-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Christoffersen & Steven Heston & Kris Jacobs, 2013. "Capturing Option Anomalies with a Variance-Dependent Pricing Kernel," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 26(8), pages 1963-2006.
    2. Janczura, Joanna & Trück, Stefan & Weron, Rafał & Wolff, Rodney C., 2013. "Identifying spikes and seasonal components in electricity spot price data: A guide to robust modeling," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 96-110.
    3. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 637-654, May-June.
    4. Douglas, Ella & Lont, David & Scott, Tom, 2014. "Finance company failure in New Zealand during 2006–2009: Predictable failures?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 277-295.
    5. G. Rigatos, 2021. "Statistical Validation of Multi-Agent Financial Models Using the H-Infinity Kalman Filter," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 58(3), pages 777-798, October.
    6. Peter Hofmann & Caroline Samp & Nils Urbach, 2020. "Robotic process automation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 99-106, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert F. Engle & Emil N. Siriwardane, 2018. "Structural GARCH: The Volatility-Leverage Connection," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(2), pages 449-492.
    2. Byun, Suk Joon & Jeon, Byoung Hyun & Min, Byungsun & Yoon, Sun-Joong, 2015. "The role of the variance premium in Jump-GARCH option pricing models," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 38-56.
    3. Maciej Kostrzewski & Jadwiga Kostrzewska, 2021. "The Impact of Forecasting Jumps on Forecasting Electricity Prices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Sanjay K. Nawalkha & Xiaoyang Zhuo, 2020. "A Theory of Equivalent Expectation Measures for Contingent Claim Returns," Papers 2006.15312, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    5. Kiesel, Rüdiger & Rahe, Florentin, 2017. "Option pricing under time-varying risk-aversion with applications to risk forecasting," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 120-138.
    6. Xinglin Yang, 2018. "Good jump, bad jump, and option valuation," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(9), pages 1097-1125, September.
    7. Feunou, Bruno & Okou, Cédric, 2019. "Good Volatility, Bad Volatility, and Option Pricing," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(2), pages 695-727, April.
    8. Gatfaoui, Hayette, 2015. "Pricing the (European) option to switch between two energy sources: An application to crude oil and natural gas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 270-283.
    9. Petra Posedel Šimović & Azra Tafro, 2021. "Pricing the Volatility Risk Premium with a Discrete Stochastic Volatility Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-15, August.
    10. David Volkmann, 2021. "Explaining S&P500 option returns: an implied risk-adjusted approach," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(2), pages 665-685, June.
    11. Rombouts, Jeroen V.K. & Stentoft, Lars, 2015. "Option pricing with asymmetric heteroskedastic normal mixture models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 635-650.
    12. Bams, Dennis & Blanchard, Gildas & Lehnert, Thorsten, 2017. "Volatility measures and Value-at-Risk," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 848-863.
    13. Assereto, Martina & Byrne, Julie, 2021. "No real option for solar in Ireland: A real option valuation of utility scale solar investment in Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    14. Jensen, Christian Skov & Lando, David & Pedersen, Lasse Heje, 2019. "Generalized recovery," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 154-174.
    15. Augustyniak, Maciej & Badescu, Alexandru & Bégin, Jean-François, 2023. "A discrete-time hedging framework with multiple factors and fat tails: On what matters," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 416-444.
    16. Stylianos Perrakis, 2022. "From innovation to obfuscation: continuous time finance fifty years later," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 36(3), pages 369-401, September.
    17. Liao, Wen Ju & Sung, Hao-Chang, 2020. "Implied risk aversion and pricing kernel in the FTSE 100 index," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    18. George M. Constantinides & Michal Czerwonko & Stylianos Perrakis, 2020. "Mispriced index option portfolios," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 49(2), pages 297-330, June.
    19. Jiao, Yuhan & Liu, Qiang & Guo, Shuxin, 2021. "Pricing kernel monotonicity and term structure: Evidence from China," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    20. Yoo, Eun Gyu & Yoon, Sun-Joong, 2020. "CBOE VIX and Jump-GARCH option pricing models," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 839-859.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:63:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10614-023-10370-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.