IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jso/coejss/v5y2016i4p506-522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship individual characteristics, group characteristics, organizations structure, organizational culture and organizational climate with organizational effectiveness colleges in Malang

Author

Listed:
  • Arie Ambarwati

    (STIE Indonesia Malang, East Java, Indonesia)

  • Sonhadji

    (State University of Malang, East Java, Indonesia)

  • I Nyoman S Degeng
  • Bambang Budi Wiyono

Abstract

This research was an ex post facto research which did not provide any control or manipulation of variables directly by the researchers. Embodiments of the independent variables have occurred naturally or cannot be manipulated, researchers tried to explain the facts that have occurred. The research design used in this research was descriptive-correlational design to obtain information regarding the observed phenomena and to describe the presence or absence of a relationship between the characteristics of individuals and groups, structure, culture and organizational climate of the effectiveness of the organization internally by large-small correlation coefficient. This was a quantitative approach usinf Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) based variants method. The independent variables (exogenous) were individual characteristics (X1), and the characteristics of the group (X2), organizational structure (X3), organizational culture (X4) and organizational climate (X5). The effectiveness of the organization was the dependent variable or endogenous variables in this study. The results of modeling the relationship among six variables studied were generated in this study including: (1) the individual characteristics of the lecturers which were not directly related to the effectiveness of the college, (2) characteristics of the group has a direct relationship with effectiveness, and organizational structure, as well as having no relationship directly to the effectiveness of organizations through the organizational structure, (3) organizational structure directly affected the effectiveness of the organization, but did not have any direct contact with the culture and climate of the organization, (4) a direct relationship was significant relationship between culture and organizational climate to organizational effectiveness, as well as the subsequent results the findings in this study were (5) the existence of a significant direct relationship between organizational climate with the culture of the organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Arie Ambarwati & Sonhadji & I Nyoman S Degeng & Bambang Budi Wiyono, 2016. "Relationship individual characteristics, group characteristics, organizations structure, organizational culture and organizational climate with organizational effectiveness colleges in Malang," Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 5(4), pages 506-522, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:jso:coejss:v:5:y:2016:i:4:p:506-522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://centreofexcellence.net/J/JSS/Vol5/No4/JSSarticle4,5_4_pp506-522.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chairuman Armia, 2002. "Pengaruh Budaya terhadap Efektivitas Organisasi : Dimensi Budaya Hofstede," Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Accounting Department, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 6(1).
    2. Allan P. O. Williams, 2006. "Development of a Quality Culture," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Rise of Cass Business School, chapter 11, pages 137-154, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Zheng, Wei & Yang, Baiyin & McLean, Gary N., 2010. "Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 763-771, July.
    4. Julian Birkinshaw & Robert Nobel & Jonas Ridderstråle, 2002. "Knowledge as a Contingency Variable: Do the Characteristics of Knowledge Predict Organization Structure?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 274-289, June.
    5. Chairuman Armia, 2002. "Pengaruh Budaya Terhadap Efektivitas Organisasi : Dimensi Budaya Hofstede," Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Accounting Department, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 6(1), pages 103-117, Juni.
    6. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Organizational culture and performance measurement systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 77-103, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neboj?a Jani?ijevi?, 2020. "The Impact Of Organizational Culture On Firm Performance: Organizational Culture As A Magic Wand Or Silent Killer?," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 10613063, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    2. Utz Schäffer & Matthias D. Mahlendorf & Jochen Rehring, 2014. "Does the Interactive Use of Headquarter Performance Measurement Systems in Foreign Subsidiaries Endanger the Potential to Profit from Local Relationships?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 24(1), pages 21-38, March.
    3. Nebojša Janićijević, 2013. "Matching Compensation System With The Type Of Organizational Culture," Serbian Association of Economists Journal, SAE - Serbian Association of Economists, issue 5-6, pages 309-324, September.
    4. Smith, Julia A. & England, Claire, 2019. "An ethnographic study of culture and performance in the UK lingerie industry," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 241-258.
    5. Matt Grimes, 2010. "Strategic Sensemaking within Funding Relationships: The Effects of Performance Measurement on Organizational Identity in the Social Sector," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 763-783, July.
    6. Gavin M Schwarz & Karin Sanders & Dave Bouckenooghe, 2020. "In the driving seat: Executive’s perceived control over environment," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(2), pages 317-342, May.
    7. Oubrich, Mourad & Hakmaoui, Abdelati & Benhayoun, Lamiae & Solberg Söilen, Klaus & Abdulkader, Bisan, 2021. "Impacts of leadership style, organizational design and HRM practices on knowledge hiding: The indirect roles of organizational justice and competitive work environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 488-499.
    8. A. E. Rodríguez Salazar & M. A. Domínguez-Crespo & A. M. Torres-Huerta & A. I. Licona-Aguilar & A. Nivón-Pellón & V. N. Orta-Guzmán, 2021. "Analysis of the Dynamical Capabilities into the Public Research Institutes to Their Strategic Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Anja Heinicke, 2018. "Performance measurement systems in small and medium-sized enterprises and family firms: a systematic literature review," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 457-502, February.
    10. Rogerio S. Victer, 2020. "Connectivity knowledge and the degree of structural formalization: a contribution to a contingency theory of organizational capability," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Arnett, Dennis B. & Sandvik, Izabela L. & Sandvik, Kåre, 2018. "Two paths to organizational effectiveness – Product advantage and life-cycle flexibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 285-292.
    12. José Roberto Frega & Alex Antonio Ferraresi & Carlos Olavo Quandt & Claudimar Pereira da Veiga, 2018. "Relationships Among Knowledge Management, Organisational Innovativeness and Performance: Covariance-Based Versus Partial Least-Squares Structural Equation Modelling," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Henri Barki & Alain Pinsonneault, 2005. "A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 165-179, April.
    14. Driss Rahma & Jarboui Anis, 2015. "Contribution of Social Disclosure and Organizational Culture to Create Financial Value of Tunisian Companies," Growth, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 2(1), pages 10-17.
    15. Walid Cheffi, 2008. "Etude Des Roles De La Comptabilite De Gestion Pour Les Managers : Le Cas D'Un Grand Groupe Automobile," Post-Print halshs-00522472, HAL.
    16. Pedraza-Rodríguez, José A. & Ruiz-Vélez, Andrea & Sánchez-Rodríguez, M. Isabel & Fernández-Esquinas, Manuel, 2023. "Management skills and organizational culture as sources of innovation for firms in peripheral regions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Peters, Matt D. & Wieder, Bernhard & Sutton, Steve G. & Wakefield, James, 2016. "Business intelligence systems use in performance measurement capabilities: Implications for enhanced competitive advantage," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-17.
    18. Wissal Affes & Habib Affes, 2022. "Business Model and Firm Performance in Tunisian Firms: a Mediated Moderation Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2822-2839, December.
    19. Martínez-Caro, Eva & Cegarra-Navarro, Juan Gabriel & Alfonso-Ruiz, Francisco Javier, 2020. "Digital technologies and firm performance: The role of digital organisational culture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    20. Ghulam Mustafa & Richard Glavee-Geo & Kjell Gronhaug & Hanan Saber Almazrouei, 2019. "Structural Impacts on Formation of Self-Efficacy and Its Performance Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jso:coejss:v:5:y:2016:i:4:p:506-522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: COES&RJ LLC. Maintainer-Workplace-Name: Centre of Excellence for Scientific & Research Journalism - COES&RJ LLC Maintainer-Address: 10685-B Hazelhurst Dr., Houston, TX 77043, USA or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.