IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v57y2023i2p313-335.html

Ex Post Path Choice Estimation for Urban Rail Systems Using Smart Card Data: An Aggregated Time-Space Hypernetwork Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Baichuan Mo

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Zhenliang Ma

    (Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm 11428, Sweden)

  • Haris N. Koutsopoulos

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115)

  • Jinhua Zhao

    (Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

This paper proposes an ex post path choice estimation framework for urban rail systems using an aggregated time-space hypernetwork approach. We aim to infer the actual passenger flow distribution in an urban rail system for any historical day using the observed automated fare collection (AFC) data. By incorporating a schedule-based dynamic transit network loading (SDTNL) model, the framework captures the crowding correlation among stations and the interaction between the path choice and passenger left behind, which is important for the path choice estimation in a “near-capacity” operated urban rail system. The path choice estimation is formulated as an optimization problem, which aims to minimize the difference between the model-derived and observed information with path choice parameters as decision variables. The original problem is intractable because of nonlinear (logit model) and nonanalytical (SDTNL) constraints. A solution procedure is proposed to decompose the original problem into three tractable subproblems, which can be solved efficiently. Solving the decomposed problem is equivalent to finding a fixed point. We prove that the solution to the original problem is the same as the decomposed problem (i.e., the fixed point) when passenger path choices follow the predefined behavior model. If this condition does not hold, the solution of the original problem is proved to be an “almost fixed point” for the decomposed problem. The model is validated using both synthetic and real-world AFC data from a major urban railway system. The analysis with synthetic data validates the model’s effectiveness in estimating path choice parameters and left behind probabilities, which outperforms state-of-art simulation-based optimization methods and probabilistic models in both accuracy and efficiency. The analysis using actual data shows that the estimated path shares are more reasonable than the baseline uniform path shares and survey-derived path shares. The model estimation is robust to different initial parameter values and AFC data from various dates.

Suggested Citation

  • Baichuan Mo & Zhenliang Ma & Haris N. Koutsopoulos & Jinhua Zhao, 2023. "Ex Post Path Choice Estimation for Urban Rail Systems Using Smart Card Data: An Aggregated Time-Space Hypernetwork Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 313-335, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:57:y:2023:i:2:p:313-335
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2022.1177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2022.1177
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.2022.1177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schmöcker, Jan-Dirk & Bell, Michael G.H. & Kurauchi, Fumitaka, 2008. "A quasi-dynamic capacity constrained frequency-based transit assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 925-945, December.
    2. Spiess, Heinz & Florian, Michael, 1989. "Optimal strategies: A new assignment model for transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 83-102, April.
    3. Satyajith Amaran & Nikolaos V. Sahinidis & Bikram Sharda & Scott J. Bury, 2016. "Simulation optimization: a review of algorithms and applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 351-380, May.
    4. Jia Hao Wu & Michael Florian & Patrice Marcotte, 1994. "Transit Equilibrium Assignment: A Model and Solution Algorithms," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 193-203, August.
    5. Hamdouch, Younes & Lawphongpanich, Siriphong, 2008. "Schedule-based transit assignment model with travel strategies and capacity constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(7-8), pages 663-684, August.
    6. Schmöcker, Jan-Dirk & Fonzone, Achille & Shimamoto, Hiroshi & Kurauchi, Fumitaka & Bell, Michael G.H., 2011. "Frequency-based transit assignment considering seat capacities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 392-408, February.
    7. Carolina Osorio & Michel Bierlaire, 2013. "A Simulation-Based Optimization Framework for Urban Transportation Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(6), pages 1333-1345, December.
    8. Zhu, Yiwen & Koutsopoulos, Haris N. & Wilson, Nigel H.M., 2017. "A probabilistic Passenger-to-Train Assignment Model based on automated data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 522-542.
    9. Rommel Regis & Christine Shoemaker, 2005. "Constrained Global Optimization of Expensive Black Box Functions Using Radial Basis Functions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 153-171, January.
    10. Hamdouch, Younes & Ho, H.W. & Sumalee, Agachai & Wang, Guodong, 2011. "Schedule-based transit assignment model with vehicle capacity and seat availability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1805-1830.
    11. Leo Kroon & Gábor Maróti & Lars Nielsen, 2015. "Rescheduling of Railway Rolling Stock with Dynamic Passenger Flows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 165-184, May.
    12. Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2000. "A stochastic transit assignment model considering differences in passengers utility functions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 377-402, June.
    13. Takahiko Kusakabe & Takamasa Iryo & Yasuo Asakura, 2010. "Estimation method for railway passengers’ train choice behavior with smart card transaction data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 731-749, September.
    14. Sang Nguyen & Stefano Pallottino & Federico Malucelli, 2001. "A Modeling Framework for Passenger Assignment on a Transport Network with Timetables," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 238-249, August.
    15. Papke, Leslie E & Wooldridge, Jeffrey M, 1996. "Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(K) Plan Participation Rates," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(6), pages 619-632, Nov.-Dec..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kai Wang & Fugee Tsung, 2025. "Dynamic and Probabilistic Forecasting of Multimode Metro Passenger Flows: A Functional Data Analysis Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1259-1282, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mo, Baichuan & Koutsopoulos, Haris N. & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max & Zhao, Jinhua, 2023. "Robust path recommendations during public transit disruptions under demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 82-107.
    2. Hamdouch, Younes & Szeto, W.Y. & Jiang, Y., 2014. "A new schedule-based transit assignment model with travel strategies and supply uncertainties," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 35-67.
    3. Jiang, Y. & Szeto, W.Y., 2016. "Reliability-based stochastic transit assignment: Formulations and capacity paradox," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 181-206.
    4. Sun, S. & Szeto, W.Y., 2018. "Logit-based transit assignment: Approach-based formulation and paradox revisit," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 191-215.
    5. Khani, Alireza, 2019. "An online shortest path algorithm for reliable routing in schedule-based transit networks considering transfer failure probability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 549-564.
    6. S. Mahmassani, Hani & F. Hyland, Michael, 2016. "Gap-based transit assignment algorithm with vehicle capacity constraints: Simulation-based implementation and large-scale applicationAuthor-Name: Verbas, Ömer," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 1-16.
    7. Codina, Esteve & Rosell, Francisca, 2017. "A heuristic method for a congested capacitated transit assignment model with strategies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 293-320.
    8. Binder, Stefan & Maknoon, Yousef & Bierlaire, Michel, 2017. "Exogenous priority rules for the capacitated passenger assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 19-42.
    9. Shang, Pan & Li, Ruimin & Guo, Jifu & Xian, Kai & Zhou, Xuesong, 2019. "Integrating Lagrangian and Eulerian observations for passenger flow state estimation in an urban rail transit network: A space-time-state hyper network-based assignment approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 135-167.
    10. Du, Muqing & Chen, Anthony, 2022. "Sensitivity analysis for transit equilibrium assignment and applications to uncertainty analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 175-202.
    11. Canca, David & Andrade-Pineda, José Luis & De los Santos, Alicia & Calle, Marcos, 2018. "The Railway Rapid Transit frequency setting problem with speed-dependent operation costs," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 494-519.
    12. Cortés, Cristián E. & Jara-Moroni, Pedro & Moreno, Eduardo & Pineda, Cristobal, 2013. "Stochastic transit equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 29-44.
    13. Kai Lu & Nan Cao, 2022. "Passenger Behavior Simulation in Congested Urban Rail Transit System: A Capacity‐Limited Optimal Strategy Model for Passenger Assignment," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    14. Shang, Pan & Xiong, Yufan & Guo, Jifu & Xian, Kai & Yu, Yun & Xu, Han, 2024. "A modeling framework to integrate frequency - and schedule-based passenger assignment approaches for coordinated path choice and space-time trajectory estimation based on multi-source observations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    15. Hamdouch, Younes & Ho, H.W. & Sumalee, Agachai & Wang, Guodong, 2011. "Schedule-based transit assignment model with vehicle capacity and seat availability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1805-1830.
    16. Cats, Oded & West, Jens & Eliasson, Jonas, 2016. "A dynamic stochastic model for evaluating congestion and crowding effects in transit systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 43-57.
    17. Trozzi, Valentina & Gentile, Guido & Bell, Michael G.H. & Kaparias, Ioannis, 2013. "Dynamic user equilibrium in public transport networks with passenger congestion and hyperpaths," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 266-285.
    18. Cortés, Cristián E. & Donoso, Pedro & Gutiérrez, Leonel & Herl, Daniel & Muñoz, Diego, 2023. "A recursive stochastic transit equilibrium model estimated using passive data from Santiago, Chile," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    19. Xing Chen & Leishan Zhou & Yixiang Yue & Yu Zhou & Liwen Liu, 2018. "Data-Driven Method to Estimate the Maximum Likelihood Space–Time Trajectory in an Urban Rail Transit System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, May.
    20. Wang, Zhichao & Jiang, Rui & Jiang, Yu & Gao, Ziyou & Liu, Ronghui, 2024. "Modelling bus bunching along a common line corridor considering passenger arrival time and transfer choice under stochastic travel time," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:57:y:2023:i:2:p:313-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.