IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v27y2025i1p305-321.html

Service Operations for Justice-on-Time: A Data-Driven Queueing Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Nitin Bakshi

    (University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112)

  • Jeunghyun Kim

    (Korea University Business School, Seoul 02841, South Korea)

  • Ramandeep S. Randhawa

    (University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089)

Abstract

Problem definition : Limited resources in the judicial system can lead to costly delays, stunted economic development, and even failure to deliver justice. Using the Supreme Court of India as an exemplar for such resource-constrained settings, we apply ideas from service operations to study delay. Specifically, court dynamics constitute a case-management queue , whereby each case may experience multiple service encounters spread across time, but all are necessarily with the same server. Our goal is to elucidate the drivers of congestion, focusing on metrics such as the expected case-disposition time (delay) and expected number of cases awaiting adjudication (pendency), and leverage this understanding to recommend operational interventions. Methodology/results : We employ data-driven calibrated simulations to model the analytically intractable case-management queue. The life cycle of a case comprises two stages: preadmission (before determining its merit for detailed hearings) and postadmission. Our methodology allows us to capture the queueing dynamics in which the judges are shared resources across the two stages. It also permits modeling of holiday capacity, which is flexibly tailored to address any surplus work that spills over from the regular year. We find that the second stage of this judicial queue is overloaded, but holiday capacity creates a perception of stability by steadying performance metrics. Managerial implications : The sources of inefficiency that drive congestion include a misalignment between scheduling guidelines and judicial capacity, coupled with the requirement to schedule hearings in advance. Together, these factors inhibit utilization of shared capacity across the two-stage judicial queue. We demonstrate how interventions that account for these inefficiencies can successfully tackle judicial delay. In particular, scheduling to improve the allocation of time across preadmission and postadmission cases can cut down the expected delay by as much as 65%.

Suggested Citation

  • Nitin Bakshi & Jeunghyun Kim & Ramandeep S. Randhawa, 2025. "Service Operations for Justice-on-Time: A Data-Driven Queueing Approach," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 305-321, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:1:p:305-321
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2023.0530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0530
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2023.0530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Legros, Benjamin & Jouini, Oualid & Akşin, O. Zeynep & Koole, Ger, 2020. "Front-office multitasking between service encounters and back-office tasks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 946-963.
    2. Nitin Bakshi & Stephen E. Flynn & Noah Gans, 2011. "Estimating the Operational Impact of Container Inspections at International Ports," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Alfred Blumstein & Richard Larson, 1969. "Models of a Total Criminal Justice System," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 199-232, April.
    4. William C. Jordan & Stephen C. Graves, 1995. "Principles on the Benefits of Manufacturing Process Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 577-594, April.
    5. Castro Massimo Finocchiaro & Guccio Calogero, 2015. "Bottlenecks or Inefficiency? An Assessment of First Instance Italian Courts’ Performance," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 317-354, July.
    6. Arnd Huchzermeier & Morris A. Cohen, 1996. "Valuing Operational Flexibility Under Exchange Rate Risk," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 100-113, February.
    7. Fernanda Campello & Armann Ingolfsson & Robert A. Shumsky, 2017. "Queueing Models of Case Managers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 882-900, March.
    8. Robert L. Bray & Decio Coviello & Andrea Ichino & Nicola Persico, 2016. "Multitasking, Multiarmed Bandits, and the Italian Judiciary," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 545-558, October.
    9. Shany Azaria & Boaz Ronen & Noam Shamir, 2024. "Alleviating Court Congestion: The Case of the Jerusalem District Court," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 267-281, May.
    10. Ryan W. Buell & Kamalini Ramdas & Nazlı Sönmez & Kavitha Srinivasan & Rengaraj Venkatesh, 2024. "Shared Service Delivery Can Increase Client Engagement: A Study of Shared Medical Appointments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 154-166, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yidan Zhang & Jamol Pender, 2025. "Community Bail Fund Systems: Fluid Limits and Approximations," Papers 2507.05490, arXiv.org.
    2. Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu & Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2009. "Multimarket Facility Network Design with Offshoring Applications," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 90-108, October.
    3. Häntsch, Marius & Huchzermeier, Arnd, 2016. "Transparency of risk for global and complex network decisions in the automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 81-95.
    4. Andrew Daw & Antonio Castellanos & Galit B. Yom-Tov & Jamol Pender & Leor Gruendlinger, 2025. "The Co-Production of Service: Modeling Services in Contact Centers Using Hawkes Processes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(3), pages 2635-2656, March.
    5. Tang, Christopher & Tomlin, Brian, 2008. "The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 12-27, November.
    6. Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2003. "Commissioned Paper: Capacity Management, Investment, and Hedging: Review and Recent Developments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 269-302, July.
    7. Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2007. "Risk Mitigation in Newsvendor Networks: Resource Diversification, Flexibility, Sharing, and Hedging," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(8), pages 1269-1288, August.
    8. Bernhard Fleischmann & Sonja Ferber & Peter Henrich, 2006. "Strategic Planning of BMW’s Global Production Network," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 194-208, June.
    9. Häntsch, Marius & Huchzermeier, Arnd, 2016. "Correct accounting for duty drawbacks with outward and inward processing in global production networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 111-127.
    10. Jiri Chod & Mihalis G. Markakis & Nikolaos Trichakis, 2021. "On the Learning Benefits of Resource Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6513-6528, October.
    11. Marius Häntsch & Arnd Huchzermeier, 2013. "Identifying, analyzing, and assessing risk in the strategic planning of a production network: the practical view of a German car manufacturer," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 125-158, July.
    12. John R. Birge, 2000. "Option Methods for Incorporating Risk into Linear Capacity Planning Models," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 19-31, August.
    13. Tanrisever, Fehmi & Morrice, Douglas & Morton, David, 2012. "Managing capacity flexibility in make-to-order production environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 334-345.
    14. Jiao Wang & Lima Zhao & Arnd Huchzermeier, 2021. "Operations‐Finance Interface in Risk Management: Research Evolution and Opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 355-389, February.
    15. Jan A. Van Mieghem & Nils Rudi, 2002. "Newsvendor Networks: Inventory Management and Capacity Investment with Discretionary Activities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 313-335, August.
    16. Ho-Yin Mak & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2014. "Pooling and Dependence of Demand and Yield in Multiple-Location Inventory Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 263-269, May.
    17. Pritam, Kocherlakota Satya & Sugandha, & Mathur, Trilok & Agarwal, Shivi, 2021. "Underlying dynamics of crime transmission with memory," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. Sangcheol Song, 2014. "Subsidiary Divestment: The Role of Multinational Flexibility," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 47-70, February.
    19. Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2005. "On the Value of Mix Flexibility and Dual Sourcing in Unreliable Newsvendor Networks," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 37-57, June.
    20. Joseph Y. J. Chow & Amelia C. Regan, 2011. "Real Option Pricing of Network Design Investments," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 50-63, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:1:p:305-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.