IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i1p353-369.html

Distance-Based Service Priority: An Innovative Mechanism to Increase System Throughput and Social Welfare

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongbin Wang

    (College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Shiliang Cui

    (McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia 20057)

  • Lei Fang

    (Business School, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

Abstract

Problem definition : The main goal of many nonprofit or nongovernmental organizations is to increase the number of customers who receive service (i.e., service coverage) and social welfare. However, the limited number of employees, volunteers, and service locations results in long service wait. In addition, getting customers living in remote areas to receive services by traveling long distances is difficult. We propose an innovative distance-based service priority policy that would reduce the service waiting time for customers who must travel farther for the service by giving them higher service priority, thereby providing them with a new incentive to seek service. Methodology/results : Using a game-theoretic queueing model, we show that the proposed policy can significantly attract more customers to a service. The increase can be up to 50% compared with the ordinary first-come-first-served service discipline. The policy can also achieve higher social welfare, however, that may come at the cost of reduced customer welfare. We therefore propose a possible remedy for a social planner to coordinate welfare under such circumstance. It ensures all stakeholders, including the service provider, customers, and society, can benefit from the policy at the same time. Finally, we compare our distance-based service priority policy with two existing strategies from the literature—namely, the price discrimination strategy and the probabilistic priority strategy. Managerial implications : Our proposed policy can play a pivotal role in a nonprofit service provider’s mission to increase service coverage and social welfare, especially when customers’ travel costs to obtain service are significant. Furthermore, our policy may create fewer implementation and fairness concerns compared with related strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongbin Wang & Shiliang Cui & Lei Fang, 2023. "Distance-Based Service Priority: An Innovative Mechanism to Increase System Throughput and Social Welfare," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 353-369, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:1:p:353-369
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.1157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1157
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.1157?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moshe Haviv & Binyamin Oz, 2018. "Self-Regulation of an Unobservable Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 2380-2389, May.
    2. Ilan Lobel, 2021. "Revenue Management and the Rise of the Algorithmic Economy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5389-5398, September.
    3. Naor, P, 1969. "The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 15-24, January.
    4. Bin Hu & Saif Benjaafar, 2009. "Partitioning of Servers in Queueing Systems During Rush Hour," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 416-428, October.
    5. Herve Moulin, 2004. "Fair Division and Collective Welfare," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262633116, December.
    6. Srinagesh Gavirneni & Vidyadhar G. Kulkarni, 2016. "Self-Selecting Priority Queues with Burr Distributed Waiting Costs," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(6), pages 979-992, June.
    7. Philipp Afèche & Haim Mendelson, 2004. "Pricing and Priority Auctions in Queueing Systems with a Generalized Delay Cost Structure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(7), pages 869-882, July.
    8. Elegido, Juan M., 2011. "The Ethics of Price Discrimination," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 633-660, October.
    9. Mor Armony & Guillaume Roels & Hummy Song, 2021. "Pooling Queues with Strategic Servers: The Effects of Customer Ownership," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 13-29, January.
    10. Haim Mendelson & Seungjin Whang, 1990. "Optimal Incentive-Compatible Priority Pricing for the M/M/1 Queue," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 870-883, October.
    11. I. Adiri & U. Yechiali, 1974. "Optimal Priority-Purchasing and Pricing Decisions in Nonmonopoly and Monopoly Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1051-1066, October.
    12. Rafael Hassin, 1995. "Decentralized Regulation of a Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 163-173, January.
    13. Hamid Nazerzadeh & Ramandeep S. Randhawa, 2018. "Near†Optimality of Coarse Service Grades for Customer Differentiation in Queueing Systems," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(3), pages 578-595, March.
    14. Nemet, Gregory F. & Bailey, Adrian J., 2000. "Distance and health care utilization among the rural elderly," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(9), pages 1197-1208, May.
    15. E. G. Coffman & I. Mitrani, 1980. "A Characterization of Waiting Time Performance Realizable by Single-Server Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3-part-ii), pages 810-821, June.
    16. Refael Hassin & Moshe Haviv, 1997. "Equilibrium Threshold Strategies: The Case of Queues with Priorities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(6), pages 966-973, December.
    17. Pengfei Guo & Paul Zipkin, 2007. "Analysis and Comparison of Queues with Different Levels of Delay Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 962-970, June.
    18. Jessica H. McCoy & Hau L. Lee, 2014. "Using Fairness Models to Improve Equity in Health Delivery Fleet Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(6), pages 965-977, June.
    19. Lui, Francis T, 1985. "An Equilibrium Queuing Model of Bribery," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 93(4), pages 760-781, August.
    20. K. R. Balachandran, 1972. "Purchasing Priorities in Queues," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5-Part-1), pages 319-326, January.
    21. Shiliang Cui & Xuanming Su & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2019. "A Model of Rational Retrials in Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1699-1718, November.
    22. Refael Hassin & Ricky Roet-Green, 2017. "The Impact of Inspection Cost on Equilibrium, Revenue, and Social Welfare in a Single-Server Queue," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 804-820, June.
    23. Rouba Ibrahim, 2018. "Sharing delay information in service systems: a literature survey," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 49-79, June.
    24. Zhongbin Wang & Luyi Yang & Shiliang Cui & Jinting Wang, 2021. "In-queue priority purchase: a dynamic game approach," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 343-381, April.
    25. Ming Hu & Yang Li & Jianfu Wang, 2018. "Efficient Ignorance: Information Heterogeneity in a Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2650-2671, June.
    26. Hassin, Refael, 1985. "On the Optimality of First Come Last Served Queues," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(1), pages 201-202, January.
    27. Itai Gurvich & Martin A. Lariviere & Can Ozkan, 2019. "Coverage, Coarseness, and Classification: Determinants of Social Efficiency in Priority Queues," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 1061-1075, March.
    28. Edelson, Noel M & Hildebrand, David K, 1975. "Congestion Tolls for Poisson Queuing Processes," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 43(1), pages 81-92, January.
    29. Gemma Berenguer & Zuo-Jun (Max) Shen, 2020. "OM Forum—Challenges and Strategies in Managing Nonprofit Operations: An Operations Management Perspective," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 888-905, September.
    30. Stock, Robert, 1983. "Distance and the utilization of health facilities in rural Nigeria," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 17(9), pages 563-570, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Gunnar Carlsson & Xiaoshan Peng & Ilya O. Ryzhov, 2024. "Demand Equilibria in Spatial Service Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 2305-2321, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Chen & Wang, Zhongbin, 2023. "The impact of line-sitting on a two-server queueing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 782-800.
    2. Shiliang Cui & Zhongbin Wang & Luyi Yang, 2020. "The Economics of Line-Sitting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 227-242, January.
    3. Chamberlain, Jonathan & Simhon, Eran & Starobinski, David, 2021. "Preemptible queues with advance reservations: Strategic behavior and revenue management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 561-578.
    4. Luyi Yang, 2021. "Invite Your Friend and You’ll Move Up in Line: Optimal Design of Referral Priority Programs," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1139-1156, September.
    5. Zhongbin Wang & Luyi Yang & Shiliang Cui & Jinting Wang, 2021. "In-queue priority purchase: a dynamic game approach," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 343-381, April.
    6. Luyi Yang & Zhongbin Wang & Shiliang Cui, 2021. "A Model of Queue Scalping," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6803-6821, November.
    7. Manlu Chen & Ming Hu & Jianfu Wang, 2022. "Food Delivery Service and Restaurant: Friend or Foe?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6539-6551, September.
    8. Refael Hassin & Ricky Roet-Green, 2021. "On Queue-Length Information when Customers Travel to a Queue," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 989-1004, July.
    9. Simin Li & Martin A. Lariviere & Achal Bassamboo, 2024. "Is Full Price the Full Story When Consumers Have Time and Budget Constraints?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 370-388, January.
    10. Wang, Tianyu & Wu, Desheng & Yang, Jiaxian, 2026. "Efficiency with consent: Permutable queueing in on-demand services," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    11. Zhongbin Wang & Yunan Liu & Lei Fang, 2022. "Pay to activate service in vacation queues," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2609-2627, June.
    12. Ming Hu & Ruslan Momot & Jianfu Wang, 2022. "Privacy Management in Service Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 2761-2779, September.
    13. Opher Baron & Antonis Economou & Athanasia Manou, 2022. "Increasing social welfare with delays: Strategic customers in the M/G/1 orbit queue," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2907-2924, July.
    14. Ramendra Singh Chauhan & N. Selvaraju, 2025. "Strategic behavior and social optimization in Markovian working vacation queues with delayed observations," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1-64, June.
    15. Yaolei Wang & Ping Cao & Jingui Xie & Dongyuan Zhan, 2025. "Advance Selling and Upgrading in Priority Queues," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1664-1682, September.
    16. Kim, Jaehong & Li, Mengling & Xu, Menghan, 2025. "Priority search with outside options," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 20(3), July.
    17. Dimitrios Logothetis & Antonis Economou, 2023. "The impact of information on transportation systems with strategic customers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(7), pages 2189-2206, July.
    18. Liron Ravner & Ran I. Snitkovsky, 2024. "Stochastic Approximation of Symmetric Nash Equilibria in Queueing Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(6), pages 2698-2725, November.
    19. Jianfu Wang & Ming Hu, 2020. "Efficient Inaccuracy: User-Generated Information Sharing in a Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4648-4666, October.
    20. Luyi Yang & Shiliang Cui & Zhongbin Wang, 2022. "Design of Covid‐19 testing queues," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 2204-2221, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:1:p:353-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.