IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v24y2022i4p2029-2047.html

Outcome-Based Reimbursement: The Solution to High Drug Spending?

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Xu

    (University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588)

  • Hongmin Li

    (Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281)

  • Hui Zhao

    (The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania 16801)

Abstract

Problem definition : The continuously soaring prices of new drugs and their uncertain effectiveness in clinical practice have put substantial risks on insurers/payers. To induce insurer coverage of their new drugs, manufacturers start to propose an innovative outcome-based reimbursement (OBR) scheme under which manufacturers refund insurers (and possibly patients) if the drugs fail to achieve a prespecified treatment target. We investigate the impact of OBR on insurers, manufacturers, and patients. Academic/practical relevance : Although OBR sounds intuitively appealing, its true impact is under much debate and depends particularly on the design of OBR. Our study sheds light on the optimal design of OBR and the debate around OBR, considering key trade-offs and key elements not covered in prior literature. Methodology : We develop a Stackelberg game under which the manufacturer designs a rebate scheme for its drug, either non-OBR or OBR, considering the trade-off between a favorable formulary position and the rebate provided. The insurer subsequently determines its formulary for the drug as well as other alternative drugs within the same disease category considering the trade-off between its spending and patient health benefits. Using data on 14 drugs treating a common disease, hyperlipidemia, we estimate through a multinomial logit model the demand of the 14 drugs and conduct counterfactual analyses on the impact of OBR. Results : Under the optimal OBR, the manufacturer lowers the insurer’s risk but inflates the wholesale price (hence, may not reduce insurer spending). OBR also induces a better formulary position for the manufacturer, which, hence, improves patient access to new drugs. Further, rebates to the insurer and patients affect demand through different mechanisms. Including patient rebates in OBR lowers patient expenses and increases drug demand but further increases insurer spending. Managerial implications : We demonstrate the structure of an optimal formulary and its application in practice. We caution insurers/payers who are seeking OBR to reduce their spending.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Xu & Hongmin Li & Hui Zhao, 2022. "Outcome-Based Reimbursement: The Solution to High Drug Spending?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 2029-2047, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:4:p:2029-2047
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2021.1051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.1051
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2021.1051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tülin Erdem & Michael P. Keane, 1996. "Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20.
    2. Andrew T. Ching & Hyunwoo Lim, 2020. "A Structural Model of Correlated Learning and Late-Mover Advantages: The Case of Statins," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1095-1123, March.
    3. Marlin U. Thomas & Sridevi S. Rao, 1999. "Warranty Economic Decision Models: A Summary and Some Suggested Directions for Future Research," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(6), pages 807-820, December.
    4. Kut C. So & Christopher S. Tang, 2000. "Modeling the Impact of an Outcome-Oriented Reimbursement Policy on Clinic, Patients, and Pharmaceutical Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(7), pages 875-892, July.
    5. Kalyan Talluri & Garrett van Ryzin, 2004. "Revenue Management Under a General Discrete Choice Model of Consumer Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 15-33, January.
    6. Howard Kunreuther & Robin Hogarth & Jacqueline Meszaros, 1993. "Insurer Ambiguity and Market Failure," Springer Books, in: Colin Camerer & Howard Kunreuther (ed.), Making Decisions About Liability And Insurance, pages 71-87, Springer.
    7. Liang (Leon) Xu & Hui Zhao & Nicholas C. Petruzzi, 2021. "Inducing Compliance with Postmarket Studies for Drugs Under FDA’s Accelerated Approval Pathway," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 170-190, 1-2.
    8. Diwakar Gupta & Mili Mehrotra, 2015. "Bundled Payments For Healthcare Services: Proposer Selection and Information Sharing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 772-788, August.
    9. Elodie Adida, 2021. "Outcome-Based Pricing for New Pharmaceuticals via Rebates," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 892-913, February.
    10. Gregory J. King & Xiuli Chao & Izak Duenyas, 2019. "Who Benefits When Prescription Drug Manufacturers Offer Copay Coupons?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(8), pages 3758-3775, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wendy Olsder & Tugce Martagan & Christopher S. Tang, 2023. "Improving Access to Rare Disease Treatments: Subsidy, Pricing, and Payment Schemes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(9), pages 5256-5274, September.
    2. Elodie Adida, 2024. "Indication-Based Pricing for Multi-Indication Drugs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7506-7523, November.
    3. Özge Yapar & Stephen E. Chick & Noah Gans, 2025. "Conditional Approval and Value-Based Pricing for New Health Technologies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(8), pages 6793-6815, August.
    4. Brekke, Kurt R. & Dalen, Dag Morten & Straume, Odd Rune, 2025. "Competition matters: uniform vs. indication-based pricing of pharmaceuticals," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 1/2025, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anil Aswani & Zuo-Jun Max Shen & Auyon Siddiq, 2019. "Data-Driven Incentive Design in the Medicare Shared Savings Program," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(4), pages 1002-1026, July.
    2. Fernanda Bravo & Taylor C. Corcoran & Elisa F. Long, 2022. "Flexible Drug Approval Policies," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 542-560, January.
    3. David Granlund, 2021. "A New Approach to Estimating State Dependence in Consumers’ Brand Choices Applied to 762 Pharmaceutical Markets," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(2), pages 443-483, June.
    4. Pengfei Guo & Christopher S. Tang & Yulan Wang & Ming Zhao, 2019. "The Impact of Reimbursement Policy on Social Welfare, Revisit Rate, and Waiting Time in a Public Healthcare System: Fee-for-Service Versus Bundled Payment," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 154-170, January.
    5. Elodie Adida & Fernanda Bravo, 2023. "Primary Care First Initiative: Impact on Care Delivery and Outcomes," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1471-1488, July.
    6. Auyon Siddiq & Christopher S. Tang & Jingwei Zhang, 2022. "Partnerships in Urban Mobility: Incentive Mechanisms for Improving Public Transit Adoption," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 956-971, March.
    7. Shima Nassiri & Elodie Adida & Hamed Mamani, 2022. "Reference Pricing for Healthcare Services," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 921-937, March.
    8. Fainman, Emily Zhu & Kucukyazici, Beste, 2020. "Design of financial incentives and payment schemes in healthcare systems: A review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Tinglong Dai & Mustafa Akan & Sridhar Tayur, 2017. "Imaging Room and Beyond: The Underlying Economics Behind Physicians’ Test-Ordering Behavior in Outpatient Services," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 99-113, February.
    10. van Ewijk, Bernadette J. & Gijsbrechts, Els & Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E.M., 2022. "The dark side of innovation: How new SKUs affect brand choice in the presence of consumer uncertainty and learning," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 967-987.
    11. Frank Huettner & Tamer Boyacı & Yalçın Akçay, 2019. "Consumer Choice Under Limited Attention When Alternatives Have Different Information Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 671-699, May.
    12. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2020. "OM Forum—Healthcare Operations Management: A Snapshot of Emerging Research," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 869-887, September.
    13. Wendy Olsder & Tugce Martagan & Christopher S. Tang, 2023. "Improving Access to Rare Disease Treatments: Subsidy, Pricing, and Payment Schemes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(9), pages 5256-5274, September.
    14. Elodie Adida, 2024. "Indication-Based Pricing for Multi-Indication Drugs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7506-7523, November.
    15. Kris Johnson Ferreira & Joel Goh, 2021. "Assortment Rotation and the Value of Concealment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1489-1507, March.
    16. Nicos Savva & Laurens Debo & Robert A. Shumsky, 2023. "Hospital Reimbursement in the Presence of Cherry Picking and Upcoding," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(11), pages 6777-6799, November.
    17. Jiarui Liu & Charles Zou & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2026. "Bayesian learning and skill accumulation in video game play," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-45, December.
    18. Octavian Oancea & Razvan Horga, 2018. "The new wave of airline revenue and pricing management – what next for the leisure customer?," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(3), pages 182-188, June.
    19. Noah Gans & George Knox & Rachel Croson, 2007. "Simple Models of Discrete Choice and Their Performance in Bandit Experiments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 383-408, December.
    20. Andreas Lanz & Gregor Reich & Ole Wilms, 2022. "Adaptive grids for the estimation of dynamic models," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 179-238, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:4:p:2029-2047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.