IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v24y2022i2p1040-1055.html

On Co-opetitive Supply Partnerships with End-Product Rivals: Information Asymmetry, Dual Sourcing and Supply Market Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Seung Hwan Jung

    (School of Business, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722 Republic of Korea)

  • Panos Kouvelis

    (Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130)

Abstract

Problem definition : We consider opportunities for cooperation at the supply level between two firms that are rivals in the end-product market. One of our firms is vertically integrated (VI), has in-house production capabilities, and may also supply its rival. The other is a downstream outsourcing (DO) firm that has better market information. The DO is willing to consider a supply partnership with the VI, but it also has the option to use the outside supply market. Academic/practical relevance : Such co-opetitive practices are common in industrial supply chains, but firms’ co-opetitive strategic sourcing with the potential of information leakage has not been examined in the literature. Methodology : We build a game-theoretic model to capture the firms’ strategic interactions under the co-opetitive supply partnership with the potential information leakage. Results : The DO exploits its information advantage to obtain a better wholesale price from the VI and may use dual sourcing to protect its private information. Anticipating that, the VI may offer wholesale price concessions as an information rent to obtain the DO’s information. Our work identifies demand uncertainty and efficiency of outside supply market as the factors affecting the VI’s pricing decision and the resulting equilibrium. Pooling equilibrium arises often, but in a few cases, the equilibrium is separating. At the separating equilibrium, the DO always single sources, either from the VI or the independent supplier depending on the demand state. The VI benefits from ancillary revenue-generating opportunity, and from information acquisition in a separating equilibrium. On the other hand, the DO’s benefit is a cheaper price in exchange for market information in a separating equilibrium. In the pooling case, the DO uses dual sourcing to hide demand information, especially in the high demand case, and to better supply the end-market through his accurate demand information. Managerial implications : Our work provides useful insights into firms’ strategic sourcing behaviors to efficiently deal with the potential of information leakage in the co-opetitive supply environment and for the rationale behind such relationships often observed in industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Seung Hwan Jung & Panos Kouvelis, 2022. "On Co-opetitive Supply Partnerships with End-Product Rivals: Information Asymmetry, Dual Sourcing and Supply Market Efficiency," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 1040-1055, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:2:p:1040-1055
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2021.0982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0982
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2021.0982?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baojun Jiang & Lin Tian & Yifan Xu & Fuqiang Zhang, 2016. "To Share or Not to Share: Demand Forecast Sharing in a Distribution Channel," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 800-809, September.
    2. Lode Li & Hongtao Zhang, 2008. "Confidentiality and Information Sharing in Supply Chain Coordination," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(8), pages 1467-1481, August.
    3. In-Koo Cho & David M. Kreps, 1987. "Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 102(2), pages 179-221.
    4. Guangwen Kong & Sampath Rajagopalan & Hao Zhang, 2013. "Revenue Sharing and Information Leakage in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 556-572, November.
    5. Younghwan In & Julian Wright, 2018. "Signaling Private Choices," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 85(1), pages 558-580.
    6. Lode Li, 2002. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with Horizontal Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(9), pages 1196-1212, September.
    7. Martin A. Lariviere & Evan L. Porteus, 2001. "Selling to the Newsvendor: An Analysis of Price-Only Contracts," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 293-305, May.
    8. Baojun Jiang & Jian Ni & Kannan Srinivasan, 2014. "Signaling Through Pricing by Service Providers with Social Preferences," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 641-654, September.
    9. Xiaole Wu & Panos Kouvelis & Hirofumi Matsuo, 2013. "Horizontal Capacity Coordination for Risk Management and Flexibility: Pay Ex Ante or Commit a Fraction of Ex Post Demand?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 458-472, July.
    10. Krishnan S. Anand & Manu Goyal, 2009. "Strategic Information Management Under Leakage in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 438-452, March.
    11. Zhuoxin Li & Stephen M. Gilbert & Guoming Lai, 2014. "Supplier Encroachment Under Asymmetric Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 449-462, February.
    12. William Schmidt & Ryan W. Buell, 2017. "Experimental Evidence of Pooling Outcomes Under Information Asymmetry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1586-1605, May.
    13. Jan A. Van Mieghem, 1999. "Coordinating Investment, Production, and Subcontracting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(7), pages 954-971, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liao, Changhua & Lu, Qihui & Chen, Xiangfeng & Xie, Shenghao, 2025. "The impact of consumer data sharing on an e-tailer’s private label strategy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Qi, Hongmei & Shi, Jihang & Zhang, Xuefeng, 2025. "Patent licensing strategies in supply chains with downstream coopetition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    3. Li, Wei & Li, Yanglei & Chen, Jing & Chen, Bintong, 2025. "Strategic decentralization of self-branded and contract manufacturing businesses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(3), pages 868-887.
    4. Huang, Qiuyu & Chen, Lei, 2025. "Waiting or inferring information from competitive contract manufacturer: The role of brand relatedness under disclosure policy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    5. Luo, Yuanyuan & Sun, Xiaojie & Yue, Xiaohang, 2024. "Store brand entry with asymmetric cost information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    6. Liu, Mengqi & Li, Guo & Zheng, Hong, 2025. "Dose free brand spillover always benefit? Procurement outsourcing in co-opetitive supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. Niu, Baozhuang & Lai, Chengwei & Zheng, Zebin & Zeng, Fanzhuo & Dai, Zhipeng, 2025. "Will supplier's quality improvement discourage competing buyers' joint procurement? Impact of product differentiation and manufacturing cooperation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo Li & Lin Tian & Hong Zheng, 2021. "Information Sharing in an Online Marketplace with Co‐opetitive Sellers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3713-3734, October.
    2. Avinadav, Tal & Shamir, Noam, 2021. "The effect of information asymmetry on ordering and capacity decisions in supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 562-578.
    3. Yossi Aviv & Noam Shamir, 2021. "Financial Cross-Ownership and Information Dissemination in a Supply Chain," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1524-1538, November.
    4. Tal Avinadav & Noam Shamir, 2023. "Partial Vertical Ownership, Capacity Investment, and Information Exchange in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(10), pages 6038-6056, October.
    5. Zhang, Qiao & Wang, Kai & Feng, Lin & Dai, Rui, 2023. "For better or worse: Impacts of information leakage by a common supplier with innovation imitation of downstream firms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Leon Yang Chu & Noam Shamir & Hyoduk Shin, 2017. "Strategic Communication for Capacity Alignment with Pricing in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(12), pages 4366-4377, December.
    7. Guoming Lai & Wenqiang Xiao, 2018. "Inventory Decisions and Signals of Demand Uncertainty to Investors," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 113-129, February.
    8. Zhang, Chu & Liu, Bin & Cai, Gangshu George & Huang, Tao, 2023. "When ignorance is bliss: The retailer’s intelligence hazard under information sharing and exchanging," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    9. Yujie Zhao & Hong Zhou & Jiepeng Wang, 2024. "Information acquisition and sharing strategies of supply chain with supplier encroachment considering signaling effect," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(3), pages 1835-1869, May.
    10. Daozhi Zhao & Zhibao Li, 2018. "The impact of manufacturer’s encroachment and nonlinear production cost on retailer’s information sharing decisions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 264(1), pages 499-539, May.
    11. Liu, Hao & Jiang, Wei & Feng, Gengzhong & Chin, Kwai-Sang, 2020. "Information leakage and supply chain contracts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    12. Wu, Junjian & Wang, Haiyan & Shang, Jennifer, 2019. "Multi-sourcing and information sharing under competition and supply uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 658-671.
    13. Noam Shamir, 2017. "Cartel Formation Through Strategic Information Leakage in a Distribution Channel," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 70-88, January.
    14. Yiwei Chen & Özalp Özer, 2019. "Supply Chain Contracts That Prevent Information Leakage," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(12), pages 5619-5650, December.
    15. Long Gao & Liang Guo & Adem Orsdemir, 2021. "Dual‐Channel Distribution: The Case for Cost Information Asymmetry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 494-521, February.
    16. Noam Shamir & Hyoduk Shin, 2016. "Public Forecast Information Sharing in a Market with Competing Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(10), pages 2994-3022, October.
    17. Yao Cui & Vishal Gaur & Jingchen Liu, 2024. "Supply Chain Transparency and Blockchain Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(5), pages 3245-3263, May.
    18. Zhuoxin Li & Stephen M. Gilbert & Guoming Lai, 2014. "Supplier Encroachment Under Asymmetric Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 449-462, February.
    19. Junjian Wu & Henry Xu, 2021. "Information Leakage and Financing Decisions in a Supply Chain with Corporate Social Responsibility and Supply Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    20. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:2:p:1040-1055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.