IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v65y2019i1p209-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Temporary Contract Adjustment to a Retailer with a Private Demand Forecast

Author

Listed:
  • Sherif Nasser

    (Cornell SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853)

  • Danko Turcic

    (Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130)

Abstract

This paper analyzes a setting in which a manufacturer (he) and a retailer (she) face uncertain demand, but the retailer has an information advantage in the form of a private demand forecast. Such information asymmetry causes the manufacturer to incur a hidden information cost . The results show that a manufacturer can leverage his timing advantage to strategically implement a temporary contract adjustment (TCA) mechanism, which allows him to counter his informational disadvantage and either eliminate or reduce the hidden information cost. The manufacturer implements the TCA mechanism by designing the supply contract with two sets of terms: presignal and postsignal. Presignal terms engage the retailer before observing the forecast signal and induce her to decide under high uncertainty. As a result, she overinvests when the forecast signal is low. Postsignal terms engage her after the signal, allowing her to make use of the information and purchase additional stock efficiently based on the forecast signal. This ability to utilize the forecast information allows the manufacturer to set more efficient contract terms. By applying the TCA mechanism to a simple wholesale price contract, the manufacturer can achieve the effect of free, partial information revelation as if he observes a coarse version of the retailer’s private forecast. By applying the TCA mechanism to a (stronger) quantity-transfer menu, the manufacturer can achieve the effect of free, full information revelation (i.e., full information profits) as if he fully observes the same version of the forecast, without the retailer directly sharing her private information.

Suggested Citation

  • Sherif Nasser & Danko Turcic, 2019. "Temporary Contract Adjustment to a Retailer with a Private Demand Forecast," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 209-229, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:65:y:2019:i:1:p:209-229
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2942
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2942?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baojun Jiang & Lin Tian & Yifan Xu & Fuqiang Zhang, 2016. "To Share or Not to Share: Demand Forecast Sharing in a Distribution Channel," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 800-809, September.
    2. Ganesh Iyer & Chakravarthi Narasimhan & Rakesh Niraj, 2007. "Information and Inventory in Distribution Channels," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(10), pages 1551-1561, October.
    3. Eyal Biyalogorsky & Oded Koenigsberg, 2010. "Ownership coordination in a channel: Incentives, returns, and negotiations," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 461-490, December.
    4. Özalp Özer & Wei Wei, 2006. "Strategic Commitments for an Optimal Capacity Decision Under Asymmetric Forecast Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(8), pages 1238-1257, August.
    5. Narasimhan, Chakravarthi, 1988. "Competitive Promotional Strategies," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 61(4), pages 427-449, October.
    6. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf, 2004. "Using Return Polices to Elicit Retailer Information," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 35(3), pages 617-630, Autumn.
    7. Esther Gal-Or & Tansev Geylani & Anthony J. Dukes, 2008. "Information Sharing in a Channel with Partially Informed Retailers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 642-658, 07-08.
    8. Tony Haitao Cui & Jagmohan S. Raju & Z. John Zhang, 2008. "A Price Discrimination Model of Trade Promotions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 779-795, 09-10.
    9. Babich, Volodymyr & Li, Hantao & Ritchken, Peter & Wang, Yunzeng, 2012. "Contracting with asymmetric demand information in supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 333-341.
    10. Liang Guo & Ganesh Iyer, 2010. "Information Acquisition and Sharing in a Vertical Relationship," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 483-506, 05-06.
    11. Liang Guo, 2009. "The Benefits of Downstream Information Acquisition," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 457-471, 05-06.
    12. Rajiv Lal & John D. C. Little & J. Miguel Villas-Boas, 1996. "A Theory of Forward Buying, Merchandising, and Trade Deals," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 21-37.
    13. Yossi Aviv, 2001. "The Effect of Collaborative Forecasting on Supply Chain Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(10), pages 1326-1343, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang Guo, 2021. "Partial Unraveling and Strategic Contract Timing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(12), pages 7719-7736, December.
    2. Ye, Yi & Guo, Qiang & Nie, Jiajia, 2023. "Retailer information strategies with a dual-purpose manufacturer," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Tong, Yang & Lu, Tao & Li, Yina & Ye, Fei, 2023. "Encroachment by a better-informed manufacturer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1113-1129.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Tian & Zhang, Hongtao, 2015. "Information sharing in a supply chain with a make-to-stock manufacturer," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 115-125.
    2. Avinadav, Tal & Chernonog, Tatyana & Ben-Zvi, Tal, 2019. "The effect of information superiority on a supply chain of virtual products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 384-397.
    3. Arcan Nalca, & Tamer Boyaci, & Saibal Ray, 2017. "Consumer taste uncertainty in the context of store brand and national brand competition," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-17-01, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    4. Tong, Yang & Lu, Tao & Li, Yina & Ye, Fei, 2023. "Encroachment by a better-informed manufacturer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1113-1129.
    5. Guan, Xu & Huang, Song & Chen, Ying-Ju, 2022. "Acquisition transparency and induced supplier encroachment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Baojun Jiang & Lin Tian & Yifan Xu & Fuqiang Zhang, 2016. "To Share or Not to Share: Demand Forecast Sharing in a Distribution Channel," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 800-809, September.
    7. Arcan Nalca, & Tamer Boyaci, & Saibal Ray, 2017. "Brand positioning and consumer taste information," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-17-01_R1, ESMT European School of Management and Technology, revised 04 Dec 2017.
    8. Nalca, Arcan & Boyaci, Tamer & Ray, Saibal, 2018. "Brand positioning and consumer taste information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 555-568.
    9. Xi Li & Krista J. Li & Yan Xiong, 2023. "Channel Coordination of Storable Goods," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 538-550, May.
    10. Long Gao & Birendra K. Mishra, 2019. "The Role of Market Evolution in Channel Contracting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2432-2441, May.
    11. Shouqiang Wang & Haresh Gurnani & Upender Subramanian, 2021. "The Informational Role of Buyback Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 279-296, January.
    12. Noam Shamir, 2017. "Cartel Formation Through Strategic Information Leakage in a Distribution Channel," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 70-88, January.
    13. Aditya Jain, 2022. "Sharing Demand Information with Retailer Under Upstream Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 4983-5001, July.
    14. Xu Guan & Ying‐Ju Chen, 2016. "Timing of information acquisition in a competitive environment," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(1), pages 3-22, February.
    15. Tian Li & Hongtao Zhang, 2023. "Gaining by ceding ‐ bounded wholesale pricing for information sharing in a supply chain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 829-843, March.
    16. Zhang, Jian & Nault, Barrie R., 2023. "Information sharing in an MTO supply chain with upstream adjustments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 97-112.
    17. Yushi Tsunoda & Yusuke Zennyo, 2021. "Platform Information Transparency and Effects on Third‐Party Suppliers and Offline Retailers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4219-4235, November.
    18. Tong, Yang & Li, Lixu & Yang, Danqin & Jiang, Xia, 2023. "Impacts of online intermediary’s platform openness under asymmetric quality information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    19. Liu, Molin & Dan, Bin & Zhang, Shuguang & Ma, Songxuan, 2021. "Information sharing in an E-tailing supply chain for fresh produce with freshness-keeping effort and value-added service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 572-584.
    20. Zhang, Shuguang & Dan, Bin & Zhou, Maosen, 2019. "After-sale service deployment and information sharing in a supply chain under demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 351-363.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:65:y:2019:i:1:p:209-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.