IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v56y2010i2p219-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Securing the Containerized Supply Chain: Analysis of Government Incentives for Private Investment

Author

Listed:
  • Nitin Bakshi

    (London Business School, Regent's Park, London NW1 4SA, United Kingdom)

  • Noah Gans

    (The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

Abstract

To mitigate the threat that terrorists smuggle weapons of mass destruction into the United States through maritime containers, the U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) inspects containers upon entry to domestic ports. Inspection-driven congestion is costly, and CBP provides incentives to firms to improve security upstream in the supply chain, thereby reducing the inspection burden at U.S. ports. We perform an economic analysis of this incentive program, called Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT), modeling in a game-theoretic framework the strategic interaction between CBP, trading firms, and terrorists. Our equilibrium results highlight the possibility that a properly run program can efficiently shift some of CBP's security burden to private industry. These results also suggest that CBP may have the opportunity to use strategic delay as an incentive for firms to join. Analysis of comparative statics shows that, with increasing capacity, membership in C-TPAT systematically declines.

Suggested Citation

  • Nitin Bakshi & Noah Gans, 2010. "Securing the Containerized Supply Chain: Analysis of Government Incentives for Private Investment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(2), pages 219-233, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:56:y:2010:i:2:p:219-233
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1105
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert A. Shumsky & Edieal J. Pinker, 2003. "Gatekeepers and Referrals in Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(7), pages 839-856, July.
    2. Susan E. Martonosi & Arnold Barnett, 2006. "How Effective Is Security Screening of Airline Passengers?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 545-552, December.
    3. Wallace J. Hopp & Seyed M. R. Iravani & Gigi Y. Yuen, 2007. "Operations Systems with Discretionary Task Completion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 61-77, January.
    4. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    5. Edieal J. Pinker, 2007. "An Analysis of Short-Term Responses to Threats of Terrorism," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 865-880, June.
    6. Lee, Hau L. & Whang, Seungjin, 2005. "Higher supply chain security with lower cost: Lessons from total quality management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 289-300, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pourakbar, M. & Zuidwijk, R.A., 2018. "The role of customs in securing containerized global supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 331-340.
    2. Michael Freeman & Susan Robinson & Stefan Scholtes, 2021. "Gatekeeping, Fast and Slow: An Empirical Study of Referral Errors in the Emergency Department," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4209-4232, July.
    3. Scott DuHadway & Steven Carnovale & Benjamin Hazen, 2019. "Understanding risk management for intentional supply chain disruptions: risk detection, risk mitigation, and risk recovery," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 179-198, December.
    4. Atkinson, Mariam K. & Saghafian, Soroush, 2019. "Who Should See the Patient? On Discretionary Patient-Provider Assignments in Hospitals," Working Paper Series rwp19-037, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    5. Xiaofang Wang & Laurens G. Debo & Alan Scheller-Wolf & Stephen F. Smith, 2010. "Design and Analysis of Diagnostic Service Centers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(11), pages 1873-1890, November.
    6. Michael Freeman & Nicos Savva & Stefan Scholtes, 2017. "Gatekeepers at Work: An Empirical Analysis of a Maternity Unit," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(10), pages 3147-3167, October.
    7. Maria R. Ibanez & Jonathan R. Clark & Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2018. "Discretionary Task Ordering: Queue Management in Radiological Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 4389-4407, September.
    8. Cinciulescu Dumitru, 2023. "Theoretical And Methodological Approaches On Risk Management In Organisations," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 194-198, December.
    9. Diwas S. KC & Bradley R. Staats & Maryam Kouchaki & Francesca Gino, 2020. "Task Selection and Workload: A Focus on Completing Easy Tasks Hurts Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4397-4416, October.
    10. Wang, Jian-Jun & Zhang, Xinmou & Shi, Jim Junmin, 2023. "Hospital dual-channel adoption decisions with telemedicine referral and misdiagnosis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Saghafian, Soroush & Hopp, Wallace J. & Iravani, Seyed M. R. & Cheng, Yao & Diermeier, Daniel, 2017. "Workload Management in Telemedical Physician Triage and Other Knowledge-Based Service Systems," Working Paper Series rwp17-035, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    12. M. J. Hermoso-Orzáez & J. Garzón-Moreno, 2022. "Risk management methodology in the supply chain: a case study applied," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 1051-1075, June.
    13. Mariam K. Atkinson & Soroush Saghafian, 2023. "Who should see the patient? on deviations from preferred patient-provider assignments in hospitals," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 165-199, June.
    14. Schmidt, Christoph G. & Wuttke, David A. & Heese, H. Sebastian & Wagner, Stephan M., 2023. "Antecedents of public reactions to supply chain glitches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    15. Jie Wu & Zhixin Chen & Xiang Ji, 2020. "Sustainable trade promotion decisions under demand disruption in manufacturer-retailer supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 115-143, July.
    16. Philipp Afèche & Mojtaba Araghi & Opher Baron, 2017. "Customer Acquisition, Retention, and Service Access Quality: Optimal Advertising, Capacity Level, and Capacity Allocation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 674-691, October.
    17. Xiang Li, 2017. "Optimal procurement strategies from suppliers with random yield and all-or-nothing risks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 167-181, October.
    18. Tolga Tezcan & Banafsheh Behzad, 2012. "Robust Design and Control of Call Centers with Flexible Interactive Voice Response Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 386-401, July.
    19. Ho-Yin Mak & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2014. "Pooling and Dependence of Demand and Yield in Multiple-Location Inventory Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 263-269, May.
    20. Tang, Liang & Jing, Ke & He, Jie & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2016. "Robustness of assembly supply chain networks by considering risk propagation and cascading failure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 459(C), pages 129-139.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:56:y:2010:i:2:p:219-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.