IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v37y1991i11p1474-1490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertain Search: A Model of Search Among Technologies of Uncertain Values

Author

Listed:
  • Steven A. Lippman

    (Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024)

  • Kevin F. McCardle

    (Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706)

Abstract

In the standard search problem there is an infinite pool of items whose distribution of values is known. A decision maker draws an item from the pool, observes its value, and decides whether to keep it or to draw another item. He can keep only one item, and he seeks the item with the largest value. In the standard uncertainty resolution problem there is only one item, and the value of that item remains uncertain even after it is drawn. The decision maker sequentially collects observations on the value of the item and decides whether to keep the item, discard the item, or take another observation. Uncertain search marries the sequential drawing from a pool of items from the search literature with the unknown value of a drawn item from the uncertainty resolution literature. Presented in the context of technology adoption, it considers drawing from a pool of new technologies whose values remain unknown even after being drawn. The decision maker sequentially purchases information in order to Bayesianly update the prior distribution of the technology's value. After each observation, the decision maker either adopts the technology (and hence quits searching), takes another costly observation, rejects the technology and quits searching, or rejects the technology and draws the next technology from the pool for observation. The solution to this uncertain search problem is surprisingly simple: solve the version of the uncertainty resolution problem in which the return to rejecting the technology is replaced by an exit value. Then use successive approximation to find a fixed point: an exit value that equals the expected value of the uncertainty resolution problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven A. Lippman & Kevin F. McCardle, 1991. "Uncertain Search: A Model of Search Among Technologies of Uncertain Values," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(11), pages 1474-1490, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:37:y:1991:i:11:p:1474-1490
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.37.11.1474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.11.1474
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.37.11.1474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teppo Felin & Stuart Kauffman & Todd Zenger, 2023. "Resource origins and search," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1514-1533, June.
    2. Laura J. Kornish & Ralph L. Keeney, 2008. "Repeated Commit-or-Defer Decisions with a Deadline: The Influenza Vaccine Composition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 527-541, June.
    3. Womer, K. & Li, H. & Camm, J. & Osterman, C. & Radhakrishnan, R., 2017. "Learning and Bayesian updating in long cycle made-to-order (MTO) production," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 29-42.
    4. Churlzu Lim & J. Neil Bearden & J. Cole Smith, 2006. "Sequential Search with Multiattribute Options," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 3-15, March.
    5. Glen M. Schmidt & Evan L. Porteus, 2000. "Sustaining Technology Leadership Can Require Both Cost Competence and Innovative Competence," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Otso Massala & Ilia Tsetlin, 2015. "Search Before Trade-offs Are Known," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 105-121.
    7. Goecke, Henry & Luhan, Wolfgang J. & Roos, Michael W.M., 2013. "Rational inattentiveness in a forecasting experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 80-89.
    8. Alexiadis, Stilianos & Eleftheriou, Konstantinos & Nijkamp, Peter, 2013. "Technology adoption within a search model: Evidence from OECD countries," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 137-148.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:37:y:1991:i:11:p:1474-1490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.