IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v41y2022i6p1045-1052.html

Invited Commentary—“How Support for Black Lives Matter Impacts Consumer Responses on Social Media”

Author

Listed:
  • Jacquelyn S. Thomas

    (Marketing Department, Cox School of Business, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275)

  • Pradeep K. Chintagunta

    (Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637)

Abstract

In this commentary, we focus on the racial justice movement popularly known as BlackLivesMatter (BLM). We begin our comments by briefly noting the history that led to the formation of the BLM organization and movement. This sets the stage for our comments on “How Support for Black Lives Matter Impacts Consumer Responses on Social Media”—an issue important for marketers who must evolve with an increasingly socially inspired economy. As BLM is a polarizing issue that is often misunderstood, we first note a potential internal validity issue with research on this topic. We then discuss issues specific to Blackout Tuesday, the intervention of interest in the paper. These include the comparability of the treatment and control platforms; the need for a clear baseline during this turbulent period; the possibility that the followers in the control condition were also treated; the parallel trends assumption; and the analysis and interpretation of the authors’ headline finding that firms supporting Blackout Tuesday faced a backlash in terms of a reduction in follower growth. Throughout this comment, we offer suggestions for future research that tackles the response to social-political issues like BLM.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacquelyn S. Thomas & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2022. "Invited Commentary—“How Support for Black Lives Matter Impacts Consumer Responses on Social Media”," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(6), pages 1045-1052, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:41:y:2022:i:6:p:1045-1052
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2022.1398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.1398
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.2022.1398?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang Wang & Marco Shaojun Qin & Xueming Luo & Yu (Eric) Kou, 2022. "Frontiers: How Support for Black Lives Matter Impacts Consumer Responses on Social Media," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(6), pages 1029-1044, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Sumin & He, Hongwei, 2025. "The impact of brand activism on consumer behaviors: Examining the contrasting roles of admiration and anger," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    2. Alagöz, Nazli, 2024. "Promotion and technological change in the music industry," Other publications TiSEM 511ceba0-62a0-4c60-a76c-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Lianlian (Dorothy) Jiang & Jinghui (Jove) Hou & Xiao Ma & Paul A. Pavlou, 2025. "Punished for Success? A Natural Experiment of Displaying Clinical Hospital Quality on Review Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 285-306, March.
    4. Louise May Hassan & Miriam McGowan & Edward Shiu, 2025. "They’re not my people: When inclusive marketing backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 563-587, March.
    5. In-Hye Kang & Amna Kirmani, 2024. "Lying and Cheating the Company: The Positive and Negative Effects of Corporate Activism on Unethical Consumer Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 39-56, June.
    6. Wang, Yiru & Kuchmaner, Christina A. & Xu, Xun & Xu, Ran, 2026. "Who Gets Heard? Analyzing online restaurant reviews to understand the representation of vulnerable consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA).
    7. Federico Mangiò & Giuseppe Pedeliento & Daniela Andreini & Lia Zarantonello, 2024. "How persuasive is woke brand communication on social media? Evidence from a consumer engagement analysis on Facebook," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(4), pages 345-381, July.
    8. Wen Wang & Beibei Li, 2025. "Learning Personalized Privacy Preference from Public Data," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 761-780, June.
    9. Kathleen T. Li, 2024. "Frontiers: A Simple Forward Difference-in-Differences Method," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 267-279, March.
    10. Pomerance, Justin & Zifla, Ermira, 2025. "Beyond the bottom line: The influence of political ideology on preference for corporate sociopolitical activism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    11. Youngtak M. Kim & Neil T. Bendle & John Hulland & Michael D. Pfarrer, 2024. "Corporate sustainability research in marketing: Mapping progress and broadening our perspective," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 1495-1512, October.
    12. Spry, Amanda & Lee, Zoe & Makkar, Marian & France, Cassandra, 2026. "Care-based corporate sociopolitical activism: identifying dark sides and envisioning an ethical framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    13. Siddharth Sharma & Justin Frake & Jared Watson, 2026. "Symbolic vs. Substantive Support: The Impact of Black Lives Matter on Black-Owned Businesses," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 45-62, January.
    14. Young Hou & Christopher Poliquin & Mariko Sakakibara & Marco Testoni, 2025. "Using Smartphone Location Data for Strategy Research," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 281-299, December.
    15. Yash Babar & Ali Mahdavi Adeli & Gordon Burtch, 2023. "The Effects of Online Social Identity Signals on Retailer Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(12), pages 7335-7346, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:41:y:2022:i:6:p:1045-1052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.