IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v24y2005i4p585-594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Globalization of Authorship in the Marketing Discipline: Does It Help or Hinder the Field?

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Stremersch

    () (Department of Marketing, School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgmeester Oudlaan 50, 3065 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and Goizueta Business School, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322-2710)

  • Peter C. Verhoef

    () (Faculty of Economics, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Marketing scholars have reflected upon the marketing discipline's internal evolution before. However, no prior study has assessed the globalization of authorship in our discipline, let alone assessed its consequences for the field. This paper addresses the following two questions: (1) Is there evidence of increasing globalization of authorship in the marketing discipline? (2) If so, does it help or hinder the field? Our work shows empirically how the globalization of our discipline evolved, how U.S. dominance is fading, and which countries experienced a rise in productivity of their affiliate and native scholars. Globalization hinders the field, because it has a negative effect on the impact of several major journals (most importantly, the and the ). Globalization helps the field, because it has a positive effect on the diversity of our discipline. Important implications of our research are: (1) Journals and sponsoring organizations should strive for more international meetings. (2) Editors, reviewers, and authors should pay more attention to the global relevance of the research they publish, review, and submit. (3) Individual researchers should aim to be part of the global community of marketing scientists through, for instance, international research visits.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Stremersch & Peter C. Verhoef, 2005. "Globalization of Authorship in the Marketing Discipline: Does It Help or Hinder the Field?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 585-594, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:24:y:2005:i:4:p:585-594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0152
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajeev K. Tyagi, 2004. "Technological Advances, Transaction Costs, and Consumer Welfare," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 335-344, January.
    2. Kocher, Martin G & Sutter, Matthias, 2001. "The Institutional Concentration of Authors in Top Journals of Economics during the Last Two Decades," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 111(472), pages 405-421, June.
    3. Reza Ahmadi & B. Rachel Yang, 2000. "Parallel Imports: Challenges from Unauthorized Distribution Channels," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 279-294, March.
    4. Cote, Joseph A & Leong, Siew Meng & Cote, Jane, 1991. " Assessing the Influence of Journal of Consumer Research: A Citation Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 402-410, December.
    5. Baumgartner, H. & Pieters, R., 2000. "The Influence of Marketing Journals : A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and its Sub-areas," Discussion Paper 2000-123, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    6. Gerard J. Tellis & Stefan Stremersch & Eden Yin, 2003. "The International Takeoff of New Products: The Role of Economics, Culture, and Country Innovativeness," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 188-208, October.
    7. Steven M. Shugan, 2003. "Editorial: Defining Interesting Research Problems," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steven M. Shugan, 2006. "Editorial: Who Is Afraid to Give Freedom of Speech to Marketing Folks?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 403-410, September.
    2. S. Stremersch & I. Verniers & C. Verhoef, 2006. "The Quest for Citations: Drivers of Article Impact," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/422, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    3. Vikas Mittal & Lawrence Feick & Feisal Murshed, 2008. "Publish and Prosper: The Financial Impact of Publishing by Marketing Faculty," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 430-442, 05-06.
    4. Steven M. Shugan & Debanjan Mitra, 2009. "Metrics--When and Why Nonaveraging Statistics Work," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 4-15, January.
    5. repec:eee:aumajo:v:21:y:2013:i:3:p:176-186 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Eisend, Martin & Schmidt, Susanne, 2014. "The influence of knowledge-based resources and business scholars’ internationalization strategies on research performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 48-59.
    7. Stremersch, S. & Camacho, N.M.A. & Vanneste, S. & Verniers, I.W.J., 2014. "Unraveling Scientific Impact," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-014-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. Girish Mallapragada & Nandini Lahiri & Atul Nerkar, 2016. "Peer Review and Research Impact," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 3(1), pages 29-41, March.
    9. repec:spr:manint:v:53:y:2013:i:2:d:10.1007_s11575-011-0124-x is not listed on IDEAS
    10. repec:eee:aumajo:v:16:y:2008:i:2:p:67-72 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. repec:eee:ijrema:v:31:y:2014:i:2:p:127-140 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. repec:eee:ijrema:v:33:y:2016:i:4:p:818-839 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Martijn G. de Jong & Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp & Bernard P. Veldkamp, 2009. "A Model for the Construction of Country-Specific Yet Internationally Comparable Short-Form Marketing Scales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 674-689, 07-08.
    14. repec:eee:ijrema:v:28:y:2011:i:3:p:248-257 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. repec:eee:ijrema:v:32:y:2015:i:1:p:64-77 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. repec:spr:scient:v:84:y:2010:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-010-0216-6 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Jacob Goldenberg & Barak Libai & Eitan Muller & Stefan Stremersch, 2010. "Database Submission—The Evolving Social Network of Marketing Scholars," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 561-567, 05-06.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:24:y:2005:i:4:p:585-594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mirko Janc). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.