IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orited/v26y2025i1p91-101.html

Game—The Freight Transportation Game: Operational Challenges for Carriers in Online Spot Market Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Mariam Lafkihi

    (Mines Paris, Centre for Management Science, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) University, Interdisciplinary Institute of Innovation (i3), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 9217, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), 75006 Paris, France)

  • Shenle Pan

    (Mines Paris, Centre for Management Science, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) University, Interdisciplinary Institute of Innovation (i3), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 9217, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), 75006 Paris, France)

  • Eric Ballot

    (Mines Paris, Centre for Management Science, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) University, Interdisciplinary Institute of Innovation (i3), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 9217, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), 75006 Paris, France)

Abstract

In the freight transport spot market, carriers face several challenges, including handling small-sized loads, managing short lead times, and dealing with uncertainties that can disrupt their existing networks and capacity. In this context, auction platforms assist carriers in developing strategies to maintain productivity and service levels. This paper introduces the freight transportation game, an online auction-based platform specifically designed for the freight spot market. The game equips players, acting as carriers, with tools to develop transportation strategies, optimize routes, and propose competitive rates to maximize profits. Players engage in decision making and competition, with key performance indicators evaluating their decisions. The game includes two scenarios; the first helps students understand the operational challenges that carriers face in spot market auctions, whereas the second encourages cooperation to enhance performance and overcome obstacles. Designed for a three-hour session, the game can be integrated into courses on supply chain management or transportation systems. The practical learnings for students from the game include understanding the complexity of constructing transport plans, recognizing the challenges of using online auction-based platforms, and experiencing the difficulties of managing spot market requests despite their benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariam Lafkihi & Shenle Pan & Eric Ballot, 2025. "Game—The Freight Transportation Game: Operational Challenges for Carriers in Online Spot Market Platforms," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 91-101, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:91-101
    DOI: 10.1287/ited.2024.0091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ited.2024.0091
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ited.2024.0091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ming Li & Yemisi A. Bolumole & Jason W. Miller, 2022. "Antecedents of Spot and Contract Freight Mix in the Truckload Sector," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(4), pages 331-368, September.
    2. Mariam Lafkihi & Shenle Pan & Eric Ballot, 2020. "Rule-based incentive mechanism design for a decentralised collaborative transport network," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(24), pages 7382-7398, December.
    3. John O. Ledyard & Mark Olson & David Porter & Joseph A. Swanson & David P. Torma, 2002. "The First Use of a Combined-Value Auction for Transportation Services," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 4-12, October.
    4. Lehmann, Benny & Lehmann, Daniel & Nisan, Noam, 2006. "Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 270-296, May.
    5. Guajardo, Mario & Rönnqvist, Mikael, 2015. "Operations research models for coalition structure in collaborative logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 147-159.
    6. Mariam Lafkihi & Shenle Pan & Eric Ballot, 2020. "Rule-based incentive mechanism design for a decentralised collaborative transport network," Post-Print hal-02378284, HAL.
    7. van Duin, J.H.R. & Tavasszy, L.A. & Taniguchi, E., 2007. "Real time simulation of auctioning and re-scheduling processes in hybrid freight markets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 1050-1066, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2018. "Collaborative vehicle routing: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 1-12.
    2. Dries R. Goossens & Rudolf Müller & Frits C. R. Spieksma, 2010. "Algorithms for Recognizing Economic Properties in Matrix Bid Combinatorial Auctions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 339-352, August.
    3. Lafkihi, Mariam & Pan, Shenle & Ballot, Eric, 2019. "Freight transportation service procurement: A literature review and future research opportunities in omnichannel E-commerce," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 348-365.
    4. Rudolf Vetschera & Dmitriy Knyazev & Daniel Rehsmann, 2024. "Properties of bundle valuations in carrier collaboration," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 32(2), pages 241-266, June.
    5. Wu, Hang & Li, Ming & Yu, Chenglin & Ouyang, Zhiyuan & Lai, Kee-hung & Zhao, Zhiheng & Pan, Shenle & Wang, Shuaian & Zhong, Ray Y. & Kuo, Yong-Hong & Zhang, Fangni & Huang, Wenjie & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max , 2025. "Towards cyber-physical internet: A systematic review, fundamental model and future perspectives," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Dellbrügge, Marius & Brilka, Tim & Kreuz, Felix & Clausen, Uwe, 2022. "Auction design in strategic freight procurement," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 295-325, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    7. Sébastien Lahaie & Benjamin Lubin, 2025. "Adaptive Pricing in Combinatorial Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(10), pages 8967-8993, October.
    8. Briand, Martin & Franklin, Rod & Lafkihi, Mariam, 2022. "A dynamic routing protocol with payments for the Physical Internet: A simulation with learning agents," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    9. Blumrosen, Liad & Nisan, Noam, 2010. "Informational limitations of ascending combinatorial auctions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(3), pages 1203-1223, May.
    10. Achamrah, Fatima Ezzahra & Puchinger, Jakob, 2024. "A gradient-descent-based framework for solving a stochastic two-echelon delivery problem with cargo-bikes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    11. Guo, Chaojie & Thompson, Russell G. & Foliente, Greg & Kong, Xiang T.R., 2021. "An auction-enabled collaborative routing mechanism for omnichannel on-demand logistics through transshipment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    12. Mario Guajardo & Kurt Jörnsten & Mikael Rönnqvist, 2016. "Constructive and blocking power in collaborative transportation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 25-50, January.
    13. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F. & Sörensen, Kenneth, 2020. "Pushing frontiers in auction-based transport collaborations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. McKelvey, Bill & Wycisk, Christine & Hülsmann, Michael, 2009. "Designing an electronic auction market for complex 'smart parts' logistics: Options based on LeBaron's computational stock market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 476-494, August.
    15. Soumyakanti Chakraborty & Anup K. Sen & Amitava Bagchi, 2015. "Addressing the valuation problem in multi-round combinatorial auctions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1145-1160, October.
    16. Wedad Elmaghraby, 2005. "The Effect of Asymmetric Bidder Size on an Auction's Performance: Are More Bidders Always Better?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(12), pages 1763-1776, December.
    17. Anthony M. Kwasnica & John O. Ledyard & Dave Porter & Christine DeMartini, 2005. "A New and Improved Design for Multiobject Iterative Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 419-434, March.
    18. Yuval Filmus & Yasushi Kawase & Yusuke Kobayashi & Yutaro Yamaguchi, 2021. "Tight Approximation for Unconstrained XOS Maximization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 1599-1610, November.
    19. Kursad Derinkuyu & Fehmi Tanrisever & Nermin Kurt & Gokhan Ceyhan, 2020. "Optimizing Day-Ahead Electricity Market Prices: Increasing the Total Surplus for Energy Exchange Istanbul," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 700-716, July.
    20. Kafle, Nabin & Zou, Bo & Lin, Jane, 2017. "Design and modeling of a crowdsource-enabled system for urban parcel relay and delivery," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 62-82.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:91-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.