IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v32y2021i3p967-986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discount Schemes for the Preemptible Service of a Cloud Platform with Unutilized Capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Shi Chen

    (Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

  • Kamran Moinzadeh

    (Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

  • Yong Tan

    (Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

Abstract

Rapid growth in the cloud services market provides tremendous opportunities to cloud providers who have invested heavily in computing capacities but also has led, at time, to low utilization of capacities. To alleviate this problem, some providers have launched a low-priority service with preemptible (spot) instances, which allows them to attract more customers while keeping the right to reclaim capacities when necessary. In this study, we consider a provider who faces a heterogeneous pool of customers with fault-tolerant (interruptible) computing jobs. We develop an analytical framework that consists of a customer-choice model and a diffusion model to capture the underlying supply-demand dynamics and the resulting preemption probability. First, we examine a commonly used discount scheme for preemptible instances, namely, the uniform discount scheme , and derive the optimal discounted price, given customers’ expectation of the preemption probability. Then, we propose another practical discount scheme, namely, the interruption-based discount scheme , which provides customers with compensation for interruptions. As long as the provider interrupts the preemptible instances randomly and customers are risk neutral, the two discount schemes are equivalent from the provider’s perspective. That said, the proposed scheme is fairer than the uniform discount scheme from the customers’ perspective, as the former provides more discounts to customers who experience more interruptions. Finally, in the presence of risk-averse customers, through a numerical study, we find that the provider would be better off by adopting the uniform discount scheme in an environment in which the level of surplus capacity stays high and stable. Overall, however, the provider would be better off by adopting the proposed scheme when the level of the surplus capacity is moderate and volatile; the relative advantage of the proposed scheme enlarges as the average surplus capacity decreases and its volatility increases.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi Chen & Kamran Moinzadeh & Yong Tan, 2021. "Discount Schemes for the Preemptible Service of a Cloud Platform with Unutilized Capacity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 967-986, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:32:y:2021:i:3:p:967-986
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2021.1011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2021.1011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amit Basu & Sreekumar Bhaskaran, 2018. "An Economic Analysis of Customer Co-design," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 787-804, December.
    2. Haim Mendelson & Seungjin Whang, 1990. "Optimal Incentive-Compatible Priority Pricing for the M/M/1 Queue," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 870-883, October.
    3. Zelin Zhang & Kissan Joseph & Ramanathan Subramaniam, 2015. "Probabilistic Selling in Quality-Differentiated Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(8), pages 1959-1977, August.
    4. Constantinos Maglaras & Assaf Zeevi, 2005. "Pricing and Design of Differentiated Services: Approximate Analysis and Structural Insights," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 242-262, April.
    5. Dan Ma & Abraham Seidmann, 2015. "Analyzing Software as a Service with Per-Transaction Charges," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 360-378, June.
    6. Shi Chen & Hau Lee & Kamran Moinzadeh, 2019. "Pricing Schemes in Cloud Computing: Utilization‐Based vs. Reservation‐Based," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(1), pages 82-102, January.
    7. Bo Li & Subodha Kumar, 2018. "Should You Kill or Embrace Your Competitor: Cloud Service and Competition Strategy," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(5), pages 822-838, May.
    8. Shuai Yuan & Sanjukta Das & R. Ramesh & Chunming Qiao, 2018. "Service Agreement Trifecta: Backup Resources, Price and Penalty in the Availability-Aware Cloud," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 947-964, December.
    9. Tianhu Deng & Ying‐Ju Chen & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2015. "Optimal pricing and scheduling control of product shipping," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(3), pages 215-227, April.
    10. Phillip J. Lederer & Lode Li, 1997. "Pricing, Production, Scheduling, and Delivery-Time Competition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 407-420, June.
    11. Roy Jones & Haim Mendelson, 2011. "Information Goods vs. Industrial Goods: Cost Structure and Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 164-176, January.
    12. Ying-Ju Chen & Ke-Wei Huang, 2016. "Pricing Data Services: Pricing by Minutes, by Gigs, or by Megabytes per Second?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 596-617.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajib L. Saha & Sumanta Singha & Subodha Kumar, 2021. "Does Congestion Always Hurt? Managing Discount Under Congestion in a Game-Theoretic Setting," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1347-1367, December.
    2. Bo Li & Subodha Kumar, 2022. "Managing Software‐as‐a‐Service: Pricing and operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2588-2608, June.
    3. Vibhanshu Abhishek & Mustafa Dogan & Alexandre Jacquillat, 2021. "Strategic Timing and Dynamic Pricing for Online Resource Allocation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4880-4907, August.
    4. Philipp Afèche, 2013. "Incentive-Compatible Revenue Management in Queueing Systems: Optimal Strategic Delay," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 423-443, July.
    5. Philipp Afèche & Opher Baron & Joseph Milner & Ricky Roet-Green, 2019. "Pricing and Prioritizing Time-Sensitive Customers with Heterogeneous Demand Rates," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(4), pages 1184-1208, July.
    6. Sagnika Sen & T. S. Raghu & Ajay Vinze, 2009. "Demand Heterogeneity in IT Infrastructure Services: Modeling and Evaluation of a Dynamic Approach to Defining Service Levels," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 258-276, June.
    7. Costis Maglaras & John Yao & Assaf Zeevi, 2018. "Optimal Price and Delay Differentiation in Large-Scale Queueing Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 2427-2444, May.
    8. Ryan W. Buell & Dennis Campbell & Frances X. Frei, 2016. "How Do Customers Respond to Increased Service Quality Competition?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 585-607, October.
    9. Anthony M. Kwasnica & Euthemia Stavrulaki, 2008. "Competitive location and capacity decisions for firms serving time‐sensitive customers," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(7), pages 704-721, October.
    10. Barış Ata & Tava Lennon Olsen, 2009. "Near-Optimal Dynamic Lead-Time Quotation and Scheduling Under Convex-Concave Customer Delay Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 753-768, June.
    11. Ying-Ju Chen & Ke-Wei Huang, 2016. "Pricing Data Services: Pricing by Minutes, by Gigs, or by Megabytes per Second?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 596-617.
    12. Erica L. Plambeck, 2004. "Optimal Leadtime Differentiation via Diffusion Approximations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 213-228, April.
    13. Manuel A. Nunez & Xue Bai & Linna Du, 2021. "Leveraging Slack Capacity in IaaS Contract Cloud Services," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(4), pages 883-901, April.
    14. Philipp Afèche & J. Michael Pavlin, 2016. "Optimal Price/Lead-Time Menus for Queues with Customer Choice: Segmentation, Pooling, and Strategic Delay," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(8), pages 2412-2436, August.
    15. Philipp Afèche & Opher Baron & Yoav Kerner, 2013. "Pricing Time-Sensitive Services Based on Realized Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 492-506, July.
    16. Gregory Dobson & Euthemia Stavrulaki, 2007. "Simultaneous price, location, and capacity decisions on a line of time‐sensitive customers," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 1-10, February.
    17. De Munck, Thomas & Chevalier, Philippe & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien, 2023. "Managing priorities on on-demand service platforms with waiting time differentiation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    18. Dongyuan Zhan & Amy R. Ward, 2019. "Staffing, Routing, and Payment to Trade off Speed and Quality in Large Service Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1738-1751, November.
    19. Jing Li & Yulin Zhang, 2021. "More market awareness, more profit? Competitive environments, business expansions, and two‐sided markets," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 249-267, March.
    20. Juanjuan Qin & Liguo Ren & Liangjie Xia, 2017. "Carbon Emission Reduction and Pricing Strategies of Supply Chain under Various Demand Forecasting Scenarios," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(01), pages 1-27, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:32:y:2021:i:3:p:967-986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.