IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v52y2022i5p398-411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpretable Operations Research for High-Stakes Decisions: Designing the Greek COVID-19 Testing System

Author

Listed:
  • Hamsa Bastani

    (Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

  • Kimon Drakopoulos

    (University of Southern California Marshall School of Business, Los Angeles, California 90089)

  • Vishal Gupta

    (University of Southern California Marshall School of Business, Los Angeles, California 90089)

  • Jon Vlachogiannis

    (AgentRisk, San Francisco, California)

  • Christos Hadjichristodoulou

    (University of Thessaly, Volos 382 21, Greece)

  • Pagona Lagiou

    (National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 157 72, Greece)

  • Gkikas Magiorkinis

    (National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 157 72, Greece)

  • Dimitrios Paraskevis

    (National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 157 72, Greece)

  • Sotirios Tsiodras

    (National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 157 72, Greece)

Abstract

In the summer of 2020, in collaboration with the Greek government, we designed and deployed Eva—the first national-scale, reinforcement learning system for targeted COVID-19 testing. In this paper, we detail the rationale for three major design/algorithmic elements: Eva’s testing supply chain, estimating COVID-19 prevalence, and test allocation. Specifically, we describe the design of Eva’s supply chain to collect and process thousands of biological samples per day with special emphasis on capacity procurement. Then, we propose a novel, empirical Bayes estimation strategy to estimate COVID-19 prevalence among various passenger types with limited data and showcase how these estimates were instrumental in making a variety of downstream decisions. Finally, we propose a novel, multiarmed bandit algorithm that dynamically allocates tests to arriving passengers in a nonstationary environment with delayed feedback and batched decisions. All our design and algorithmic choices emphasize the need for transparent reasoning to enable human-in-the-loop analytics. Such transparency was crucial to building trust and acceptance among policymakers and public health experts in a period of global crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamsa Bastani & Kimon Drakopoulos & Vishal Gupta & Jon Vlachogiannis & Christos Hadjichristodoulou & Pagona Lagiou & Gkikas Magiorkinis & Dimitrios Paraskevis & Sotirios Tsiodras, 2022. "Interpretable Operations Research for High-Stakes Decisions: Designing the Greek COVID-19 Testing System," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 398-411, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:52:y:2022:i:5:p:398-411
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.2022.1128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.2022.1128
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.2022.1128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianqing Fan & Jinchi Lv, 2008. "Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 849-911, November.
    2. Antoine Désir & Vineet Goyal & Yehua Wei & Jiawei Zhang, 2016. "Sparse Process Flexibility Designs: Is the Long Chain Really Optimal?," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 416-431, April.
    3. Dimitris Bertsimas & Adam J. Mersereau, 2007. "A Learning Approach for Interactive Marketing to a Customer Segment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 1120-1135, December.
    4. William C. Jordan & Stephen C. Graves, 1995. "Principles on the Benefits of Manufacturing Process Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 577-594, April.
    5. Jason Acimovic & Stephen C. Graves, 2015. "Making Better Fulfillment Decisions on the Fly in an Online Retail Environment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 34-51, February.
    6. Melo, M.T. & Nickel, S. & Saldanha-da-Gama, F., 2009. "Facility location and supply chain management - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 401-412, July.
    7. Hamsa Bastani & Mohsen Bayati, 2020. "Online Decision Making with High-Dimensional Covariates," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 276-294, January.
    8. Vishal Gupta & Paat Rusmevichientong, 2021. "Small-Data, Large-Scale Linear Optimization with Uncertain Objectives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 220-241, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arash Asadpour & Xuan Wang & Jiawei Zhang, 2020. "Online Resource Allocation with Limited Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 642-666, February.
    2. Shixin Wang & Xuan Wang & Jiawei Zhang, 2021. "A Review of Flexible Processes and Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1804-1824, June.
    3. Frank van den Heuvel & Karel van Donselaar & Peter de Langen & Jan Fransoo, 2016. "Co-Location Synergies: Specialised Versus Diverse Logistics Concentration Areas," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(3), pages 331-346, July.
    4. Kim, Nayeon & Montreuil, Benoit & Klibi, Walid & Zied Babai, M., 2023. "Network inventory deployment for responsive fulfillment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    5. Meng Qi & Ho‐Yin Mak & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2020. "Data‐driven research in retail operations—A review," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(8), pages 595-616, December.
    6. Kimia Keshanian & Daniel Zantedeschi & Kaushik Dutta, 2022. "Features Selection as a Nash-Bargaining Solution: Applications in Online Advertising and Information Systems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2485-2501, September.
    7. Xi Chen & Tengyu Ma & Jiawei Zhang & Yuan Zhou, 2019. "Optimal Design of Process Flexibility for General Production Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 516-531, March.
    8. Gérard P. Cachon & Karan Girotra & Serguei Netessine, 2020. "Interesting, Important, and Impactful Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 214-222, January.
    9. Häntsch, Marius & Huchzermeier, Arnd, 2016. "Correct accounting for duty drawbacks with outward and inward processing in global production networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 111-127.
    10. Guodong Lyu & Wang-Chi Cheung & Mabel C. Chou & Chung-Piaw Teo & Zhichao Zheng & Yuanguang Zhong, 2019. "Capacity Allocation in Flexible Production Networks: Theory and Applications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(11), pages 5091-5109, November.
    11. Rujeerapaiboon, Napat & Zhong, Yuanguang & Zhu, Dan, 2023. "Resilience of long chain under disruption," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 597-615.
    12. Timothy C. Y. Chan & Daniel Letourneau & Benjamin G. Potter, 2022. "Sparse flexible design: a machine learning approach," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1066-1116, December.
    13. Zhenzhen Yan & Sarah Yini Gao & Chung Piaw Teo, 2018. "On the Design of Sparse but Efficient Structures in Operations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3421-3445, July.
    14. Perraudat, Antoine & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Vialletelle, Philippe, 2022. "Robust tactical qualification decisions in flexible manufacturing systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    15. Jingui Xie & Yiming Fan & Mabel C. Chou, 2017. "Flexibility design in loss and queueing systems: efficiency of k-chain configuration," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 286-308, June.
    16. Zhen Xu & Hailun Zhang & Jiheng Zhang & Rachel Q. Zhang, 2020. "Online Demand Fulfillment Under Limited Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4667-4685, October.
    17. Cong Shi & Yehua Wei & Yuan Zhong, 2019. "Process Flexibility for Multiperiod Production Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1300-1320, September.
    18. Yueshan Yu & Xin Chen & Fuqiang Zhang, 2015. "Dynamic Capacity Management with General Upgrading," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1372-1389, December.
    19. Moritz Julius Ziegler & Kilian Seifried & Philipp Kuske & Moritz Fleischmann, 2019. "TRUMPF Uses a Mixed Integer Model as Decision Support for Strategic Production Network Design," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 213-226, May.
    20. Meng An & Haixiang Zhang, 2023. "High-Dimensional Mediation Analysis for Time-to-Event Outcomes with Additive Hazards Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:52:y:2022:i:5:p:398-411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.