IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v33y2021i3p1162-1176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for Team Formation on Social Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Nihal Berktaş

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Bilkent University, 06800 Çankaya/Ankara, Turkey)

  • Hande Yaman

    (Research Centre for Operations Research and Statistics (ORSTAT), Faculty of Economics and Business, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium)

Abstract

The team formation problem (TFP) aims to construct a capable team that can communicate and collaborate effectively. The cost of communication is quantified using the proximity of the potential members in a social network. We study a TFP with two measures for communication effectiveness; namely, we minimize the sum of communication costs, and we impose an upper bound on the largest communication cost. This problem can be formulated as a constrained quadratic set covering problem. Our experiments show that a general-purpose solver is capable of solving small and medium-sized instances to optimality. We propose a branch-and-bound algorithm to solve larger sizes: we reformulate the problem and relax it in such a way that it decomposes into a series of linear set covering problems, and we impose the relaxed constraints through branching. Our computational experiments show that the algorithm is capable of solving large-size instances, which are intractable for the solver. Summary of Contribution: This paper presents an exact algorithm for the Team Formation Problem (TFP), in which the aim is, given a project and its required skills, to construct a capable team that can communicate and collaborate effectively. This combinatorial optimization problem is modeled as a quadratic set covering problem. The study provides a novel branch-and-bound algorithm where a reformulation of the problem is relaxed so that it decomposes into a series of linear set covering problems and the relaxed constraints are imposed through branching. The algorithm is able to solve instances that are intractable for commercial solvers. The study illustrates an efficient usage of algorithmic methods and modelling techniques for an operations research problem. It contributes to the field of computational optimization by proposing a new application as well as a new algorithm to solve a quadratic version of a classical combinatorial optimization problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Nihal Berktaş & Hande Yaman, 2021. "A Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for Team Formation on Social Networks," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1162-1176, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:33:y:2021:i:3:p:1162-1176
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2020.1000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2020.1000
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2020.1000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adams, Warren P. & Guignard, Monique & Hahn, Peter M. & Hightower, William L., 2007. "A level-2 reformulation-linearization technique bound for the quadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(3), pages 983-996, August.
    2. Loiola, Eliane Maria & de Abreu, Nair Maria Maia & Boaventura-Netto, Paulo Oswaldo & Hahn, Peter & Querido, Tania, 2007. "A survey for the quadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 657-690, January.
    3. J. Alberto Espinosa & Sandra A. Slaughter & Robert E. Kraut & James D. Herbsleb, 2007. "Familiarity, Complexity, and Team Performance in Geographically Distributed Software Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 613-630, August.
    4. Martin Hoegl & Hans Georg Gemuenden, 2001. "Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 435-449, August.
    5. Alberto Caprara & David Pisinger & Paolo Toth, 1999. "Exact Solution of the Quadratic Knapsack Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 125-137, May.
    6. Guimarães, Dilson Almeida & da Cunha, Alexandre Salles & Pereira, Dilson Lucas, 2020. "Semidefinite programming lower bounds and branch-and-bound algorithms for the quadratic minimum spanning tree problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(1), pages 46-58.
    7. W. David Pisinger & Anders Bo Rasmussen & Rune Sandvik, 2007. "Solution of Large Quadratic Knapsack Problems Through Aggressive Reduction," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 280-290, May.
    8. Boon, Bart H. & Sierksma, Gerard, 2003. "Team formation: Matching quality supply and quality demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 277-292, July.
    9. David Bergman, 2019. "An Exact Algorithm for the Quadratic Multiknapsack Problem with an Application to Event Seating," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 477-492, July.
    10. Mokhtar S. Bazaraa & Jamie J. Goode, 1975. "A Cutting-Plane Algorithm for the Quadratic Set-Covering Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 150-158, February.
    11. Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats & David M. Upton, 2009. "Team Familiarity, Role Experience, and Performance: Evidence from Indian Software Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 85-100, January.
    12. Warren P. Adams & Hanif D. Sherali, 1986. "A Tight Linearization and an Algorithm for Zero-One Quadratic Programming Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(10), pages 1274-1290, October.
    13. Billionnet, Alain & Calmels, Frederic, 1996. "Linear programming for the 0-1 quadratic knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 310-325, July.
    14. Peter M. Hahn & Yi-Rong Zhu & Monique Guignard & William L. Hightower & Matthew J. Saltzman, 2012. "A Level-3 Reformulation-Linearization Technique-Based Bound for the Quadratic Assignment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 202-209, May.
    15. Rafael Martinelli & Claudio Contardo, 2015. "Exact and Heuristic Algorithms for Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problems with Quadratic Costs Structure," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 658-676, November.
    16. E. de Klerk & R. Sotirov & U. Truetsch, 2015. "A New Semidefinite Programming Relaxation for the Quadratic Assignment Problem and Its Computational Perspectives," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 378-391, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ming Tang & Huchang Liao, 2023. "Group Structure and Information Distribution on the Emergence of Collective Intelligence," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 133-150, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monique Guignard, 2020. "Strong RLT1 bounds from decomposable Lagrangean relaxation for some quadratic 0–1 optimization problems with linear constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 173-200, March.
    2. Caprara, Alberto, 2008. "Constrained 0-1 quadratic programming: Basic approaches and extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1494-1503, June.
    3. Pessoa, Artur Alves & Hahn, Peter M. & Guignard, Monique & Zhu, Yi-Rong, 2010. "Algorithms for the generalized quadratic assignment problem combining Lagrangean decomposition and the Reformulation-Linearization Technique," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 54-63, October.
    4. Stefan Helber & Daniel Böhme & Farid Oucherif & Svenja Lagershausen & Steffen Kasper, 2016. "A hierarchical facility layout planning approach for large and complex hospitals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 5-29, June.
    5. de Klerk, Etienne & -Nagy, Marianna E. & Sotirov, Renata & Truetsch, Uwe, 2014. "Symmetry in RLT-type relaxations for the quadratic assignment and standard quadratic optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 488-499.
    6. Jiming Peng & Tao Zhu & Hezhi Luo & Kim-Chuan Toh, 2015. "Semi-definite programming relaxation of quadratic assignment problems based on nonredundant matrix splitting," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 171-198, January.
    7. Ketan Date & Rakesh Nagi, 2019. "Level 2 Reformulation Linearization Technique–Based Parallel Algorithms for Solving Large Quadratic Assignment Problems on Graphics Processing Unit Clusters," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 771-789, October.
    8. Alexandre Domingues Gonçalves & Artur Alves Pessoa & Cristiana Bentes & Ricardo Farias & Lúcia Maria de A. Drummond, 2017. "A Graphics Processing Unit Algorithm to Solve the Quadratic Assignment Problem Using Level-2 Reformulation-Linearization Technique," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 676-687, November.
    9. Lucas A. Waddell & Jerry L. Phillips & Tianzhu Liu & Swarup Dhar, 2023. "An LP-based characterization of solvable QAP instances with chess-board and graded structures," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1-23, July.
    10. Peter M. Hahn & Yi-Rong Zhu & Monique Guignard & William L. Hightower & Matthew J. Saltzman, 2012. "A Level-3 Reformulation-Linearization Technique-Based Bound for the Quadratic Assignment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 202-209, May.
    11. Silva, Allyson & Coelho, Leandro C. & Darvish, Maryam, 2021. "Quadratic assignment problem variants: A survey and an effective parallel memetic iterated tabu search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1066-1084.
    12. David Bergman, 2019. "An Exact Algorithm for the Quadratic Multiknapsack Problem with an Application to Event Seating," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 477-492, July.
    13. Palubeckis, Gintaras, 2015. "Fast simulated annealing for single-row equidistant facility layout," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 287-301.
    14. Franklin Djeumou Fomeni & Adam N. Letchford, 2014. "A Dynamic Programming Heuristic for the Quadratic Knapsack Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 173-182, February.
    15. Rostami, Borzou & Malucelli, Federico & Belotti, Pietro & Gualandi, Stefano, 2016. "Lower bounding procedure for the asymmetric quadratic traveling salesman problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 584-592.
    16. Parker, Owen N. & Mui, Rachel & Bhawe, Nachiket & Semadeni, Matthew, 2022. "Insight or ignorance: How collaborative history in a workgroup fits with project type to shape performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 154-167.
    17. Daniel Tzabbar & Alex Vestal, 2015. "Bridging the Social Chasm in Geographically Distributed R&D Teams: The Moderating Effects of Relational Strength and Status Asymmetry on the Novelty of Team Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 811-829, June.
    18. Fabio Furini & Emiliano Traversi, 2019. "Theoretical and computational study of several linearisation techniques for binary quadratic problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 279(1), pages 387-411, August.
    19. Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2011. "Fluid Tasks and Fluid Teams: The Impact of Diversity in Experience and Team Familiarity on Team Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 310-328, July.
    20. Sven Mallach, 2021. "Inductive linearization for binary quadratic programs with linear constraints," 4OR, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 549-570, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:33:y:2021:i:3:p:1162-1176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.