IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v31y2019i1p40-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Compressor Optimization in Natural Gas Pipeline Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Terrence W. K. Mak

    (Data61, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia, H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • Pascal Van Hentenryck

    (H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • Anatoly Zlotnik

    (Center for Nonlinear Studies, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545)

  • Russell Bent

    (A-1: Information and Systems Modeling, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545)

Abstract

The growing dependence of electric power systems on gas-fired generators to balance fluctuating and intermittent production by renewable energy sources has increased the variation and volume of flows withdrawn from natural gas transmission pipelines. Adapting pipeline operations to maintain efficiency and security under these dynamic conditions requires optimization methods that account for substantial intraday transients and can rapidly compute solutions in reaction to generator re-dispatch. Here, we present a computationally efficient method for minimizing gas compression costs under dynamic conditions where deliveries to customers are described by time-dependent mass flows. The optimization method uses a simplified representation of gas flow physics, provides a choice of discretization schemes in time and space, and exploits a two-stage approach to minimize energy costs and ensure smooth and physically meaningful solutions. The resulting large-scale NLPs are solved using an interior point method. The optimization scheme is validated by comparing the solutions with an integration of the dynamic equations using an adaptive timestepping differential equation solver, as well as a different, recently proposed optimal control scheme. The comparison shows that solutions to the discretized problem are feasible for the continuous problem and also practical from an operational standpoint. The results also indicate that our scheme produces at least an order of magnitude reduction in computation time relative to the state of the art and scales to large gas transmission networks with more than 6,000 kilometers of total pipeline.

Suggested Citation

  • Terrence W. K. Mak & Pascal Van Hentenryck & Anatoly Zlotnik & Russell Bent, 2019. "Dynamic Compressor Optimization in Natural Gas Pipeline Systems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 40-65, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:31:y:2019:i:1:p:40-65
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2018.0821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2018.0821
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2018.0821?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qadrdan, Meysam & Chaudry, Modassar & Wu, Jianzhong & Jenkins, Nick & Ekanayake, Janaka, 2010. "Impact of a large penetration of wind generation on the GB gas network," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5684-5695, October.
    2. Matko, Drago & Geiger, Gerhard & Gregoritza, Withold, 2000. "Verification of various pipeline models," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 303-308.
    3. Conrado Borraz-Sánchez & Russell Bent & Scott Backhaus & Hassan Hijazi & Pascal Van Hentenryck, 2016. "Convex Relaxations for Gas Expansion Planning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 645-656, November.
    4. B. Rothfarb & H. Frank & D. M. Rosenbaum & K. Steiglitz & D. J. Kleitman, 1970. "Optimal Design of Offshore Natural-Gas Pipeline Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 992-1020, December.
    5. Domschke, Pia & Kolb, Oliver & Lang, Jens, 2015. "Adjoint-based error control for the simulation and optimization of gas and water supply networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 1003-1018.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christopher Yeates & Cornelia Schmidt-Hattenberger & Wolfgang Weinzierl & David Bruhn, 2021. "Heuristic Methods for Minimum-Cost Pipeline Network Design – a Node Valency Transfer Metaheuristic," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 839-871, December.
    2. Pia Domschke & Oliver Kolb & Jens Lang, 2022. "Fast and reliable transient simulation and continuous optimization of large-scale gas networks," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 95(3), pages 475-501, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ralf Lenz & Kai Helge Becker, 2022. "Optimization of capacity expansion in potential-driven networks including multiple looping: a comparison of modelling approaches," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 179-224, March.
    2. Wang, Yongli & Wang, Yudong & Huang, Yujing & Yang, Jiale & Ma, Yuze & Yu, Haiyang & Zeng, Ming & Zhang, Fuwei & Zhang, Yanfu, 2019. "Operation optimization of regional integrated energy system based on the modeling of electricity-thermal-natural gas network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Chi, Lixun & Su, Huai & Zio, Enrico & Zhang, Jinjun & Li, Xueyi & Zhang, Li & Fan, Lin & Zhou, Jing & Bai, Hua, 2020. "Integrated Deterministic and Probabilistic Safety Analysis of Integrated Energy Systems with bi-directional conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    4. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.
    5. Pellegrino, Sandro & Lanzini, Andrea & Leone, Pierluigi, 2017. "Greening the gas network – The need for modelling the distributed injection of alternative fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 266-286.
    6. Fambri, Gabriele & Diaz-Londono, Cesar & Mazza, Andrea & Badami, Marco & Sihvonen, Teemu & Weiss, Robert, 2022. "Techno-economic analysis of Power-to-Gas plants in a gas and electricity distribution network system with high renewable energy penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    7. Liang, Yingzong & Hui, Chi Wai, 2018. "Convexification for natural gas transmission networks optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1001-1016.
    8. Mengying Xue & Tianhu Deng & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2019. "Optimizing natural gas pipeline transmission with nonuniform elevation: A new initialization approach," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(7), pages 547-564, October.
    9. Shiono, Naoshi & Suzuki, Hisatoshi & Saruwatari, Yasufumi, 2019. "A dynamic programming approach for the pipe network layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 52-61.
    10. Ordoudis, Christos & Pinson, Pierre & Morales, Juan M., 2019. "An Integrated Market for Electricity and Natural Gas Systems with Stochastic Power Producers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 642-654.
    11. Foley, A.M. & Ó Gallachóir, B.P. & McKeogh, E.J. & Milborrow, D. & Leahy, P.G., 2013. "Addressing the technical and market challenges to high wind power integration in Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 692-703.
    12. Amir Ahmadi-Javid & Pooya Hoseinpour, 2022. "Convexification of Queueing Formulas by Mixed-Integer Second-Order Cone Programming: An Application to a Discrete Location Problem with Congestion," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2621-2633, September.
    13. Jin, Xiaolong & Mu, Yunfei & Jia, Hongjie & Wu, Jianzhong & Xu, Xiandong & Yu, Xiaodan, 2016. "Optimal day-ahead scheduling of integrated urban energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1-13.
    14. Keyaerts, Nico & Delarue, Erik & Rombauts, Yannick & D’haeseleer, William, 2014. "Impact of unpredictable renewables on gas-balancing design in Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 266-277.
    15. Ordoudis, Christos & Delikaraoglou, Stefanos & Kazempour, Jalal & Pinson, Pierre, 2020. "Market-based coordination of integrated electricity and natural gas systems under uncertain supply," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1105-1119.
    16. Demeulemeester, Erik L. & Herroelen, Willy S. & Elmaghraby, Salah E., 1996. "Optimal procedures for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem in project networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 50-68, January.
    17. Anna Schwele & Christos Ordoudis & Pierre Pinson & Jalal Kazempour, 2021. "Coordination of power and natural gas markets via financial instruments," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 505-538, October.
    18. Veronika Grimm & Lars Schewe & Martin Schmidt & Gregor Zöttl, 2019. "A multilevel model of the European entry-exit gas market," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 89(2), pages 223-255, April.
    19. Qadrdan, Meysam & Cheng, Meng & Wu, Jianzhong & Jenkins, Nick, 2017. "Benefits of demand-side response in combined gas and electricity networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 360-369.
    20. Moritz Link & Stefan Volkwein, 2023. "Adaptive piecewise linear relaxations for enclosure computations for nonconvex multiobjective mixed-integer quadratically constrained programs," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 97-132, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:31:y:2019:i:1:p:40-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.