IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ijm/journl/v8y2015i3p6-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of a Multi-Agent Microsimulation Model for Subway Carriage Design

Author

Listed:
  • Le-le Cao

    (State Key Laboratory on Intelligent Technology and Systems, Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology (TNList), Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua university, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Xiao-xue Li

    (School of Accountancy, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Fen-ni Kang

    (Lab MAS, Ecole Centrale Paris, Grande Voie des Vignes, F-92295 Chatenay-Malabry, France)

  • Chang Liu

    (State Key Laboratory on Intelligent Technology and Systems, Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology (TNList), Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua university, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Fu-chun Sun

    (State Key Laboratory on Intelligent Technology and Systems, Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology (TNList), Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua university, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Ramamohanarao Kotagiri

    (Department of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010 VIC, Australia)

Abstract

Multi-agent microsimulation, as a third way of doing science other than induction and deduction methods, is explored to aid subway carriage design in this paper. Realizing that passenger behavior shapes the environment and in turn is shaped by the environment itself, we intend to model this interaction and examine the effectiveness and usability of the proposed model. We address our micro-model from essential aspects of environment space, agent attributes, agent behaviors, simulation process, and global objective/convergence function. Based on the real and simulated data, we evaluate our model with a combination of quantitative and qualitative procedures. For quantitative approach, we proposed two evaluation paradigms (i.e. unified multinomial classifier and one-vs.-all binary classifiers) using the state-of-the-art machine learning techniques and frameworks; and we manage to show from various perspectives that our model matches the reality in the majority of cases. For qualitative verification, we present a small-scale case study to evaluate different seat layouts in a subway carriage, and identify their advantages and disadvantages with little effort. By enriching microsimulation theory with innovative techniques, our research aims at promoting its acceptance level in design communities by means of avoiding costly creation of real-world experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Le-le Cao & Xiao-xue Li & Fen-ni Kang & Chang Liu & Fu-chun Sun & Ramamohanarao Kotagiri, 2015. "The Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of a Multi-Agent Microsimulation Model for Subway Carriage Design," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 8(3), pages 6-40.
  • Handle: RePEc:ijm:journl:v:8:y:2015:i:3:p:6-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://microsimulation.org/IJM/V8_3/IJM_8_3_2015_Cao.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helbing, Dirk & Armbruster, Dieter & Mikhailov, Alexander S. & Lefeber, Erjen, 2006. "Information and material flows in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 363(1), pages 1-1.
    2. Philip Ball, 2000. "Science in motion," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6793), pages 244-245, July.
    3. Robert Axelrod, 1997. "Advancing the Art of Simulation in the Social Sciences," Working Papers 97-05-048, Santa Fe Institute.
    4. Dirk Helbing & Bernardo A. Huberman, 1998. "Coherent moving states in highway traffic," Nature, Nature, vol. 396(6713), pages 738-740, December.
    5. Michael Batty, 1997. "Predicting where we walk," Nature, Nature, vol. 388(6637), pages 19-20, July.
    6. Dirk Helbing & Joachim Keltsch & Péter Molnár, 1997. "Modelling the evolution of human trail systems," Nature, Nature, vol. 388(6637), pages 47-50, July.
    7. Robert Tobias & Carole Hofmann, 2004. "Evaluation of free Java-libraries for social-scientific agent based simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 7(1), pages 1-6.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehdi Moussaïd & Elsa G Guillot & Mathieu Moreau & Jérôme Fehrenbach & Olivier Chabiron & Samuel Lemercier & Julien Pettré & Cécile Appert-Rolland & Pierre Degond & Guy Theraulaz, 2012. "Traffic Instabilities in Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowds," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-10, March.
    2. Giannoccaro, Ilaria, 2015. "Adaptive supply chains in industrial districts: A complexity science approach focused on learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 576-589.
    3. Flaminio Squazzoni, 2010. "The impact of agent-based models in the social sciences after 15 years of incursions," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 18(2), pages 197-234.
    4. Pietro Terna, 2000. "Sum: A Surprising (Un)Realistic Market - Building A Simple Stock Market Structure With Swarm," Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 173, Society for Computational Economics.
    5. Torsten Trimborn & Philipp Otte & Simon Cramer & Maximilian Beikirch & Emma Pabich & Martin Frank, 2020. "SABCEMM: A Simulator for Agent-Based Computational Economic Market Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 55(2), pages 707-744, February.
    6. Klug, Florian, 2014. "Modelling and analysis of synchronised material flow with fluid dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 393(C), pages 404-417.
    7. Newbery, Robert & Lean, Jonathan & Moizer, Jonathan & Haddoud, Mohamed, 2018. "Entrepreneurial identity formation during the initial entrepreneurial experience: The influence of simulation feedback and existing identity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 51-59.
    8. Lilian N. Alessa & Melinda Laituri & C. Michael Barton, 2006. "An "All Hands" Call to the Social Science Community: Establishing a Community Framework for Complexity Modeling Using Agent Based Models and Cyberinfrastructure," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 9(4), pages 1-6.
    9. Healey, Mark P. & Bleda, Mercedes & Querbes, Adrien, 2021. "Opportunity evaluation in teams: A social cognitive model," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4).
    10. Edoardo Mollona & David Hales, 2006. "Knowledge-Based Jobs and the Boundaries of Firms Agent-based Simulation of Firms Learning and Workforce Skill Set Dynamics," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 27(1), pages 35-62, February.
    11. Carvalho, Rui & Penn, Alan, 2004. "Scaling and universality in the micro-structure of urban space," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 332(C), pages 539-547.
    12. Gašper Jaklič & Tadej Kanduč & Selena Praprotnik & Emil Žagar, 2012. "Energy Minimizing Mountain Ascent," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 680-693, November.
    13. Shu-Heng Chen & Bin-Tzong Chie & Ying-Fang Kao & Ragupathy Venkatachalam, 2019. "Agent-Based Modeling of a Non-tâtonnement Process for the Scarf Economy: The Role of Learning," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 305-341, June.
    14. Nigel Gilbert & Pietro Terna, 2000. "How to build and use agent-based models in social science," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 1(1), pages 57-72, March.
    15. Shu-Heng Chen & Chia-Hsuan Yeh, 1999. "Evolving Traders and the Faculty of the Business School: A New Architecture of the Artificial Stock Market," Computing in Economics and Finance 1999 613, Society for Computational Economics.
    16. Carlo Bianchi & Pasquale Cirillo & Mauro Gallegati & Pietro Vagliasindi, 2007. "Validating and Calibrating Agent-Based Models: A Case Study," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 30(3), pages 245-264, October.
    17. Alan G. Isaac, 2011. "The ABM Template Models: A Reformulation with Reference Implementations," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 14(2), pages 1-5.
    18. Federico Cosenz & Guido Noto, 2016. "Applying System Dynamics Modelling to Strategic Management: A Literature Review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 703-741, November.
    19. Johanna Habib & François de Corbière, 2014. "Proposition et illustration d'un design de recherche combinant étude de cas et simulation multi-agents pour explorer les processus émergents en Systèmes d'information," Post-Print hal-01130779, HAL.
    20. Francis Tseng & Fei Liu & Bernardo Alves Furtado, 2017. "Humans of Simulated New York (HOSNY): an exploratory comprehensive model of city life," Papers 1703.05240, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2017.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Microsimulation; multi-agent; machine learning; neural network; design; subway carriage; pedestrian flow; qualitative study; quantitative evaluation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J11 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts
    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ijm:journl:v:8:y:2015:i:3:p:6-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jinjing Li (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.microsimulation.pub .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.