IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jkm000/v17y2021i1p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Importance of Knowledge-Based Risk Processes to Risk Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Amine Nehari-Talet

    (King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia)

  • Louay Karadsheh

    (Higher Colleges of Technology, Dubai, UAE)

  • Samer Alhawari

    (World Islamic Sciences and Education University, Jordan)

  • Hana Hunaiti

    (World Islamic Sciences and Education University, Jordan)

Abstract

Knowledge-based risk processes are suitable key elements within organizations since they can minimize the possibility and impact of an information technology (IT) project. The aim of this paper is to explain how the alignment between knowledge-based risk processes to validate risk analysis. A questionnaire was developed and distributed to a sample of 135 respondents who were actively engaged in IT. The proposed research model explained that 50 to 62% from of the variance in knowledge-based risk processes to risk analysis. The results showed that the two selected factors (identification and sharing) have a partially mediate and significant impact on risk analysis by knowledge-based risk repository. On the other hand, the examination is not mediated and not a significant impact on risk analysis. The findings of this study imply the understanding of knowledge-based risk processes to risk analysis This study will contribute to the field by examining the effects knowledge-based risk on risk analysis for IT projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Amine Nehari-Talet & Louay Karadsheh & Samer Alhawari & Hana Hunaiti, 2021. "The Importance of Knowledge-Based Risk Processes to Risk Analysis," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jkm000:v:17:y:2021:i:1:p:1-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJKM.2021010103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hock-Doepgen, Marianne & Clauss, Thomas & Kraus, Sascha & Cheng, Cheng-Feng, 2021. "Knowledge management capabilities and organizational risk-taking for business model innovation in SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 683-697.
    2. Ali Mohammad Padyab & Tero Päivärinta & Dan Harnesk, 2014. "Genre-Based Approach to Assessing Information and Knowledge Security Risks," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 10(2), pages 13-27, April.
    3. Eduardo Rodriguez & John S. Edwards, 2014. "Knowledge Management in Support of Enterprise Risk Management," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 10(2), pages 43-61, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dwivedi, Abhishek & Pawsey, Nicholas, 2023. "Examining the drivers of marketing innovation in SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    2. Demetris Vrontis & Jaroslav Belas & Alkis Thrassou & Gabriele Santoro & Michael Christofi, 2023. "Strategic agility, openness and performance: a mixed method comparative analysis of firms operating in developed and emerging markets," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1365-1398, May.
    3. Azeem, Muhammad & Ahmed, Munir & Haider, Sajid & Sajjad, Muhammad, 2021. "Expanding competitive advantage through organizational culture, knowledge sharing and organizational innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Kristina Stoiber & Kurt Matzler & Julia Hautz, 2023. "Ambidextrous structures paving the way for disruptive business models: a conceptual framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1439-1485, May.
    5. Chen, Kuan-Yang & Huan, Tzung-Cheng, 2022. "Explore how SME family businesses of travel service industry use market knowledge for product innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 519-530.
    6. Ming-Ta Tu & Li-Shiue Gau & Ji-Hwan Park & Wen-Shin Huang & Pham Thuy Duong & Jong-Chae Kim, 2022. "Smart and Sustainable Management of Shoe Machinery Companies in Taiwan during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Case Studies of the Tung Sheng Company and Strong Basic Enterprise Limited Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-11, August.
    7. Annuridya Rosyidta Pratiwi Octasylva & Lilik Noor Yuliati & Hartoyo Hartoyo & Agus W. Soehadi, 2022. "Innovativeness as the Key to MSMEs’ Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Simon Ashby & Trevor Buck & Stephanie Nöth-Zahn & Thomas Peisl, 2018. "Emerging IT Risks: Insights from German Banking," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 43(2), pages 180-207, April.
    9. Shih-Hsien Tseng & Hsiu-Chuan Chen & Tien Son Nguyen, 2022. "Key Success Factors of Sustainable Organization for Traditional Manufacturing Industries: A Case Study in Taiwan," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Tiberius, Victor & Stiller, Laura & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "Sustainability beyond economic prosperity: Social microfoundations of dynamic capabilities in family businesses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. Zhu, Peiyu & Miao, Xiaoming & Jin, Shumo & Moehler, Robert, 2023. "Transactive memory system, boundary-spanning search and business model innovation: the moderating role of environmental dynamism," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    12. Yuanqin Ge, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: The impact of dynamic knowledge management capability on enterprise innovation performance," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1048-1059, December.
    13. Samuel Adomako & Nguyen Phong Nguyen, 2023. "Green creativity, responsible innovation, and product innovation performance: A study of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4413-4425, November.
    14. Anna Wójcik-Karpacz & Jarosław Karpacz & Piotr Brzeziński & Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Bernard Ziębicki, 2023. "Barriers and Drivers for Changes in Circular Business Models in a Textile Recycling Sector: Results of Qualitative Empirical Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, January.
    15. Moon, Hakil & Di Benedetto, Anthony & Kim, Sang Kyun, 2022. "The effect of network tie position on a firm’s innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 821-829.
    16. Marcus Dejardin & Mario L. Raposo & João J. Ferreira & Cristina I. Fernandes & Pedro M. Veiga & Luís Farinha, 2023. "The impact of dynamic capabilities on SME performance during COVID-19," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1703-1729, July.
    17. Clauss, Thomas & Ritala, Paavo, 2023. "Network governance institutionalization: Creating mutual value by harnessing and avoiding conflicts in interorganizational networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    18. Xiangqian Li & Qiang Qiang & Li Huang & Cunquan Huang, 2022. "How Knowledge Sharing Affects Business Model Innovation: An Empirical Study from the Perspective of Ambidextrous Organizational Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Zhongshu Lin & Xueyao Li & Yeng Wai Lau & Wei Theng Lau & Sabarina Mohammed Shah, 2024. "Business Models of Chinese Firms Impacted by the Crisis Based on Case Studies," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 13, March.
    20. Pérez-Fernández, Héctor & Cacciotti, Gabriella & Martín-Cruz, Natalia & Delgado-García, Juan Bautista, 2022. "Are interactions between need for achievement and social networks the driving force behind entrepreneurial Intention? A trait activation story," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 65-76.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jkm000:v:17:y:2021:i:1:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.