A cost-benefit approach to the evaluation of regional selective assistance
The ‘Green Book’ and the recent EGRUP report support exchequer cost per job as a key input in the ex-ante appraisal of individual applications for Regional Selective Assistance (RSA) and the ex-post evaluation of the RSA scheme as a whole. In this paper, following a recommendation in the House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee’s report on regional policy, the merits of an alternative, explicitly cost-benefit, framework are outlined. This approach incorporates the administration and compliance costs of the subsidy, costs at present ignored in RSA evaluation studies. An optimal ex-ante appraisal rule is developed. This takes the form of a cost-per-job ceiling, and a representative value is calculated for this figure.
Volume (Year): 18 (1997)
Issue (Month): 1 (February)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE|
Phone: (+44) 020 7291 4800
Fax: (+44) 020 7323 4780
Web page: http://www.ifs.org.uk
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Postal: The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE|
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Ashcroft, Brian & Swales, J. K., 1982. "Estimating the effects of government office dispersal : An application of demand constrained shadow wages," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 81-97, February.
- Hare, Paul G, 1975. "Regional Investment Criteria and Shadow Wage Rates," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 22(3), pages 305-320, November.