IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v17y2025i1p22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond Profit: Ethical Imperatives and the Role of Duty of Care in Sustainable Investment Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel K Nartey

Abstract

This paper critically examines the dynamic and evolving landscape of sustainable finance, exploring the complex interrelations between key investment strategies such as Socially Responsible Investing (SRI), Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing, impact investing, and thematic investing, alongside the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). Through an extensive review of 50 scholarly articles and 25 global corporate reports, the study interrogates the conceptual ambiguities and overlapping elements inherent in these frameworks, revealing notable deficiencies in the ethical principles that underpin them. At the heart of this inquiry lies the concept of the duty of care, which compels investors to consider the broader social and environmental implications of their financial decisions. While these investment approaches purport to address pressing global challenges such as climate change and resource scarcity, the findings suggest that many of them prioritise financial returns over ethical considerations, thus compromising their potential to effect genuine change. The paper advocates for a profound re-evaluation of sustainable finance practices, calling for an ethical recalibration that transcends mere profit maximisation. As part of this reappraisal, the paper proposes a revision of the Typology of Sustainable Finance, as articulated by Schoenmaker and Schramade (2018), to embed the duty of care as a foundational principle, thereby offering a more rigorous framework for understanding and implementing sustainable finance. Moreover, the paper considers the EU CSDDD as a significant regulatory advancement, highlighting its potential to reshape corporate accountability and influence sustainable investment practices. Ultimately, this work seeks to contribute to a more coherent, ethically grounded conception of sustainable finance, one that fosters an investment culture truly reflective of social and environmental responsibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel K Nartey, 2025. "Beyond Profit: Ethical Imperatives and the Role of Duty of Care in Sustainable Investment Strategies," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(1), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/0/0/51048/55362
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/0/51048
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Revelli, Christophe, 2017. "Socially responsible investing (SRI): From mainstream to margin?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(PB), pages 711-717.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alice Martini, 2019. "Socially responsible investing: from the ethical origins to the sustainable development framework of the european union," Public Finance Research Papers 36, Istituto di Economia e Finanza, DSGE, Sapienza University of Rome.
    2. Millar, John & Mueller, Frank & Carter, Chris, 2024. "Mediating ESG: Mapping individual responses to a changing field," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Alain Devalle & Simona Fiandrino & Valter Cantino, 2017. "The Linkage between ESG Performance and Credit Ratings: A Firm-Level Perspective Analysis," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 1-53, August.
    4. Lagoarde-Segot, Thomas & Paranque, Bernard, 2018. "Finance and sustainability: From ideology to utopia," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 80-92.
    5. Emilia Di Lorenzo & Marilena Sibillo, 2020. "Economic Paradigms and Corporate Culture after the Great COVID-19 Pandemic: Towards a New Role of Welfare Organisations and Insurers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Pierdomenico Duttilo & Stefano Antonio Gattone & Barbara Iannone, 2024. "Mixtures of generalized normal distributions and EGARCH models to analyse returns and volatility of ESG and traditional investments," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 108(4), pages 755-775, December.
    7. Shoonchul Shin & Juyoung Lee & Pratima (Tima) Bansal, 2022. "From a shareholder to stakeholder orientation: Evidence from the analyses of CEO dismissal in large U.S. firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(7), pages 1233-1257, July.
    8. Aneta Drab, 2022. "The Impact of ESG Factors on Company Share Prices in the European Energy Sector (Wplyw czynnikow ESG na kursy akcji spolek z sektora energetycznego w Europie)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(37), pages 4-14.
    9. Muhammad Jawad & Munazza Naz, 2025. "Elasticity of ESSM stock volatility: an analysis of the collapse of U.S., European, and Chinese markets during the COVID-19 pandemic," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Harasheh, Murad & Bouteska, Ahmed & Manita, Riadh, 2024. "Investors' preferences for sustainable investments: Evidence from the U.S. using an experimental approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    11. Janik, Bogna & Płuciennik, Piotr, 2024. "Corporate ESG indices and stability during periods of deep concerns in financial markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Cheng, Louis T.W. & Lee, Shu Kam & Li, Sung Ko & Tsang, Chun Kei, 2023. "Understanding resource deployment efficiency for ESG and financial performance: A DEA approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Alda, Mercedes & Vicente, Ruth, 2020. "Behavioural analysis of socially responsible investment managers: specialists versus non-specialists," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. Archana Saxena & Rajesh Singh & Anita Gehlot & Shaik Vaseem Akram & Bhekisipho Twala & Aman Singh & Elisabeth Caro Montero & Neeraj Priyadarshi, 2022. "Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Arthur Hughes & Michael A. Urban & Dariusz Wójcik, 2021. "Alternative ESG Ratings: How Technological Innovation Is Reshaping Sustainable Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Pierdomenico Duttilo, 2024. "Modelling financial returns with mixtures of generalized normal distributions," Papers 2411.11847, arXiv.org.
    17. Lagerkvist, C.J. & Edenbrandt, A.K. & Tibbelin, I. & Wahlstedt, Y., 2020. "Preferences for sustainable and responsible equity funds - A choice experiment with Swedish private investors," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    18. Monge, Manuel & Lazcano, Ana & Parada, José Luis, 2023. "Growth vs value investing: Persistence and time trend before and after COVID-19," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    19. Alda, Mercedes, 2020. "ESG fund scores in UK SRI and conventional pension funds: Are the ESG concerns of the SRI niche affecting the conventional mainstream?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    20. Maria-Teresa Bosch-Badia & Joan Montllor-Serrats & Maria-Antonia Tarrazon-Rodon, 2018. "Sustainability and Ethics in the Process of Price Determination in Financial Markets: A Conceptual Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.