IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v10y2018i9p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Internal Control on Audit Program Effectiveness: The Case of Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Thi Que Nguyen
  • Manh Dung Tran
  • Thi Viet Ha Hoang

Abstract

This research is conducted to examine the relationship between components of risk assessment, environmental control and control activities of internal control system and the effectiveness of the audit program in Vietnamese firms. Data were collected by sending questionnaires to management, internal auditors, and accountants of Vietnam firms and feedback of 87 responses. By testing Cronbach¡¯s Alpha, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Analysis of Variables (ANOVA), the results show that control environment, risk assessment and control activities contribute significantly to an effective audit program. These results indicate that Vietnamese firms lack required experiences to cope with the current instruments of internal control assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Thi Que Nguyen & Manh Dung Tran & Thi Viet Ha Hoang, 2018. "Impact of Internal Control on Audit Program Effectiveness: The Case of Vietnam," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(9), pages 1-1, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/76101/42633
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/76101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sorinel Domnisoru & Sorin-Sandu Vinatoru, 2008. "Auditor independence, audit committee quality and internal control weaknesses," Revista Tinerilor Economisti (The Young Economists Journal), University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(11), pages 7-12, November.
    2. Weber, R, 1978. "Auditor Decision-Making On Overall System Reliability - Accuracy, Consensus, And The Usefulness Of A Simulation Decision Aid," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(2), pages 368-388.
    3. Mcdaniel, Ls, 1990. "The Effects Of Time Pressure And Audit Program Structure On Audit Performance," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 267-285.
    4. Stefanescu Cristina & Muresan Mariana & Bota-Avram Cristina, 2010. "Monitoring In Credit Institutions – Comparative Approach On Internal Control Systems – The Case Of Romania Vs. International Models Of Control," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 589-594, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ely Suhayati, 2012. "The Influence Of Audit Fee, Audit Time Budget Pressure And Public Accountant Attitude On The Public Accountant Dysfunctional Behavior And It’S Implication On Audit Quality Survey On “Small” Scale Publ," Journal of Global Management, Global Research Agency, vol. 4(1), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Hurley, Patrick J., 2015. "Ego depletion: Applications and implications for auditing research," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 47-76.
    3. Kathryn Kadous & Yuepin (Daniel) Zhou, 2019. "How Does Intrinsic Motivation Improve Auditor Judgment in Complex Audit Tasks?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 108-131, March.
    4. Thomas, Rodney W. & Esper, Terry L. & Stank, Theodore P., 2010. "Testing the Negative Effects of Time Pressure in Retail Supply Chain Relationships," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(4), pages 386-400.
    5. García Blandón, Josep & Argilés Bosch, Josep Maria, 2013. "Audit firm tenure and qualified opinions: New evidence from Spain," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 118-125.
    6. Ruhnke, Klaus & Schmitz, Stefanie, 2019. "Review engagements – structure of audit firm methodology and its situational application in Germany," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    7. Casper E. Wiggins & L. Murphy Smith, 1987. "A generalized audit simulation tool for evaluating the reliability of internal controls," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 316-337, March.
    8. Anthony R. Bowrin & James King, 2010. "Time pressure, task complexity, and audit effectiveness," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 25(2), pages 160-181, January.
    9. Chris Hall & Philip Yetton & Ian Zimmer, 1982. "The Assessment of Payroll Internal Control Systems and Auditors' Experience, Tolerance of Ambiguity, and Dogmatism," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 7(1), pages 49-60, June.
    10. El-Hussein E. El-Masry, 2008. "Factors affecting auditors' utilization of evidential cues," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(1), pages 26-50, January.
    11. Lambert, Tamara A. & Jones, Keith L. & Brazel, Joseph F. & Showalter, D. Scott, 2017. "Audit time pressure and earnings quality: An examination of accelerated filings," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 50-66.
    12. Carlos Pinho Ph.D., 2014. "The Usefulness of Analytical Procedures: An Empirical Approach in the Auditing Sector in Portugal," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 4(8), pages 25-33, August.
    13. Pernilla Broberg & Torbjörn Tagesson & Daniela Argento & Niclas Gyllengahm & Ola Mårtensson, 2017. "Explaining the influence of time budget pressure on audit quality in Sweden," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(2), pages 331-350, June.
    14. E. Michael Bamber & Joseph H. Bylinski, 1987. "The effects of the planning memorandum, time pressure and individual auditor characteristics on audit managers' review time judgments," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 127-143, September.
    15. Gold-Nöteberg, A.H. & Gronewold, U. & Salterio, S., 2010. "The Impact of Error-Management Climate, Error Type and Error Originator on Auditors’ Reporting Errors Discovered on Audit Work Papers," ERIM Report Series Research in Management 20551, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    16. Janet Morrill, 1996. "Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. Professional Judgment and the Auditor," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 371-378, March.
    17. Bonner, Sarah E. & Sprinkle, Geoffrey B., 2002. "The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: theories, evidence, and a framework for research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(4-5), pages 303-345.
    18. Dijk, M. van, 1998. "Litigation and audit quality; two experimental studies," Research Report 98C42, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    19. Steve Buchheit, 2009. "A comparison of auditor and non-auditor performance evaluations," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 24(1), pages 22-38, January.
    20. Braun, Robert L., 2000. "The effect of time pressure on auditor attention to qualitative aspects of misstatements indicative of potential fraudulent financial reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 243-259, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.