IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v13y2020i4p104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Metadiscourse in the Persuasive Writing of Nigerian Undergraduates

Author

Listed:
  • Shehu Muhammad Korau
  • Muhammad Mukhtar Aliyu

Abstract

Persuasive writing is a very important prerequisite for undergraduates in their academic life endeavour. For the students to effectively compose good persuasive writing, they need to understand and employ metadiscourse appropriately in their writing. However, a large number of Nigerian undergraduates face lots of challenges in using metadiscourse in their writing. Therefore, this study investigated the use of metadiscourse in the persuasive writing of Nigerian undergraduates, by examining the relationship between the frequency of metadiscourse used and the persuasive writing quality. The participants of the study are second-year students of English in one of the Nigerian Universities. The data used in the study were collected through the participants’ written persuasive essays. The essays were analyzed by highlighting all the metadiscourse used in the texts. The findings indicate that the participants’ persuasive essays have a low deployment of metadiscourse which also correlates with their persuasive writing quality. It was observed that almost all the metadiscourse markers were underutilized by the participants such as endophoric markers, evidential, code glosses, hedges and self-mention. Some other metadiscourse were left out in some of the participants' persuasive essays. The study highlights some benefits of the use of metadiscourse and some implications that would improve the teaching and learning of metadiscourse, particularly in the Nigerian setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Shehu Muhammad Korau & Muhammad Mukhtar Aliyu, 2020. "Use of Metadiscourse in the Persuasive Writing of Nigerian Undergraduates," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(4), pages 104-104, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:13:y:2020:i:4:p:104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/42353/44146
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/42353
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen Tan & Wong Bee Eng, 2014. "Metadiscourse Use in the Persuasive Writing of Malaysian Undergraduate Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(7), pages 1-26, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dang Ngoc Cat Tien, 2023. "The use of metadiscourse markers in applied linguistics research proposals written by Vietnamese MA students," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 13(2), pages 111-124.
    2. Philip M. McCarthy & Noor W. Kaddoura & Khawlah Ahmed & Rachel Hall Buck & Anuja M. Thomas & Ayah Al-harthy & Nicholas D. Duran, 2021. "Metadiscourse and Counterargument Integration in Student Argumentative Papers," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(6), pages 1-96, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:13:y:2020:i:4:p:104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.