IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-6p1990-2004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of Interactive Metadiscourse Markers in Expository Writing by Malaysian ESL Undergraduates

Author

Listed:
  • Siti Faridah Kamaruddin

    (Academy of Language Studies University Technology MARA Sarawak Branch, Mukah Campus, Malaysia)

  • Naginder Kaur

    (Academy of Language Studies University Technology MARA Sarawak Branch, Mukah Campus, Malaysia)

Abstract

Studies on metadiscourse have been conducted extensively across different genres, namely, research articles, research theses, and argumentative writing. Due to differences in genres and levels of education (undergraduate/postgraduate), there has been inconsistency in results, although most studies have adopted a common framework, which is the Interpersonal Metadiscourse model. Among these genres, research on using metadiscourse resources in expository writing needs to be further investigated, especially in the Malaysian context. Hence, this study aimed to uncover the interactive metadiscourse features used in expository essays written by English as a Second Language (ESL) students from a public university in Malaysia. The primary objective is to identify the differences in the use of interactive metadiscourse markers concerning clarity and conciseness based on Hyland’s model of metadiscourse. A corpus of 206 expository essays comprising 83,445 words produced by the students was developed and analysed through quantitative and qualitative research. In order to achieve an acceptable degree of reliability, the essays were first analysed electronically using software called Text Inspector. Then, all the metadiscourse markers were examined qualitatively in context to determine their actual functions. Results revealed that the high use of interactive markers corresponds to the nature of expository essays, which is to explain, describe, or inform the reader about a particular topic or subject. The students in this study also understand that expository essays should be written neutrally, focusing on presenting facts, explaining concepts, and clearly understanding the topic. This study concluded that interactive markers are essential for inclusion in expository writing, especially in a language proficiency course, to ensure factual and critical thinking writers can be nurtured. The findings of this study may render some pedagogical implications in the ESL context, especially in writing expository essays among undergraduates.

Suggested Citation

  • Siti Faridah Kamaruddin & Naginder Kaur, 2025. "An Analysis of Interactive Metadiscourse Markers in Expository Writing by Malaysian ESL Undergraduates," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(6), pages 1990-2004, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-6:p:1990-2004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-6/1990-2004.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/an-analysis-of-interactive-metadiscourse-markers-in-expository-writing-by-malaysian-esl-undergraduates/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen Tan & Wong Bee Eng, 2014. "Metadiscourse Use in the Persuasive Writing of Malaysian Undergraduate Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(7), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Isabelle Chou & Weiyi Li & Kanglong Liu, 2023. "Representation of interactional metadiscourse in translated and native English: A corpus-assisted study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Noor Hanim Rahmat & Nur Anisah Tan Abdullah & Mohamad Hanis Yahaya & Choong Pow Yean & Wararat Whanchit, 2020. "Gender Differences on the Use of Metadiscourse on Reflective Essays: A Case Study of Inbound Students," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(5), pages 248-261.
    4. Nor Hafizah Anwardeen & Eunice Ong Luyee & Joanna Indra Gabriel & Seyed Ali Rezvani Kalajahi, 2013. "An Analysis: The Usage of Metadiscourse in Argumentative Writing by Malaysian Tertiary Level of Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(9), pages 1-83, September.
    5. Noor Hanim Rahmat & Nur Anisah Tan Abdullah & Mohamad Hanis Yahaya & Choong Pow Yean & Wararat Whanchit, 2020. "Gender Differences on the Use of Metadiscourse on Reflective Essays: A Case Study of Inbound Students," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(5), pages 248-261, May.
    6. Miguel Cuevas-Alonso & Carla Míguez-Álvarez, 2021. "Metadiscursive Markers and Text Genre: A Metareview," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dang Ngoc Cat Tien, 2023. "The use of metadiscourse markers in applied linguistics research proposals written by Vietnamese MA students," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 13(2), pages 111-124.
    2. Tarek Assassi & Kenza Merghmi, 2023. "Formulaic Sequences and Meta-Discourse Markers in Applied Linguistics Research Papers. A cross-linguistic corpus-based analysis of native and non-native authors’ published articles," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 27, pages 154-175, January.
    3. Philip M. McCarthy & Noor W. Kaddoura & Khawlah Ahmed & Rachel Hall Buck & Anuja M. Thomas & Ayah Al-harthy & Nicholas D. Duran, 2021. "Metadiscourse and Counterargument Integration in Student Argumentative Papers," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(6), pages 1-96, June.
    4. Helen Tan & Wong Bee Eng, 2014. "Metadiscourse Use in the Persuasive Writing of Malaysian Undergraduate Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(7), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Shehu Muhammad Korau & Muhammad Mukhtar Aliyu, 2020. "Use of Metadiscourse in the Persuasive Writing of Nigerian Undergraduates," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(4), pages 104-104, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-6:p:1990-2004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.