IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v12y2019i5p40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Book Review Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Ishtiaq

Abstract

The book Research Design- Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches by Creswell (2014) covers three approaches— qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. This educational book is informative and illustrative and is equally beneficial for students, teachers and researchers. Readers should have basic knowledge of research for better understanding of this book. There are two parts of the book. Part 1 (chapter 1-4) consists of steps for developing research proposal and part II (chapter 5-10) explains how to develop a research proposal or write a research report. A summary is given at the end of every chapter that helps the reader to recapitulate the ideas. Moreover, writing exercises and suggested readings at the end of every chapter are useful for the readers.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Ishtiaq, 2019. "Book Review Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(5), pages 1-40, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:5:p:40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/39044/39885
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/39044
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony Onwuegbuzie & Nancy Leech, 2005. "Taking the “Q” Out of Research: Teaching Research Methodology Courses Without the Divide Between Quantitative and Qualitative Paradigms," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 267-295, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dwayne Jefferson & Frederick Paige & Philip Agee & France Jackson, 2021. "User Experience of Green Building Certification Resources: EarthCraft Multifamily," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Helena Čierna & Erika Sujová & Patrycja Hąbek & Elena Horská & Zuzana Kapsdorferová, 2017. "Learning organization at higher education institutions in the EU: proposal for implementing philosophy of learning organization—results from research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1305-1320, May.
    3. Puls, René & Lentz, Cheryl, 2018. "Retail concessions at European airports: Commercial strategies to improve non-aeronautical revenue from leisure travelers," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 243-249.
    4. Karen Bell & Eldin Fahmy & David Gordon, 2016. "Quantitative conversations: the importance of developing rapport in standardised interviewing," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 193-212, January.
    5. Nimruji Jammulamadaka, 2020. "Reading Institutional Logics of CSR in India from a Post-colonial Location," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 599-617, May.
    6. Stefan Stieglitz & Milad Mirbabaie & Nicholas R. J. Möllmann & Jannik Rzyski, 2022. "Collaborating with Virtual Assistants in Organizations: Analyzing Social Loafing Tendencies and Responsibility Attribution," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 745-770, June.
    7. Stephen Harwood, 2023. "Complex Problems and Dealing with them on a Research Methods Course in a Business School," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 587-607, August.
    8. Mosleh Zeebaree & Mary Agoyi & Musbah Aqel, 2022. "Sustainable Adoption of E-Government from the UTAUT Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    9. Hilde Tobi & Jarl K. Kampen, 2018. "Research design: the methodology for interdisciplinary research framework," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 1209-1225, May.
    10. C. Poortman & K. Schildkamp, 2012. "Alternative quality standards in qualitative research?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1727-1751, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:5:p:40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.