IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v10y2017i11p141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical and Non-Technical Programme Students’ Attitudes and Reasons for Plagiarism

Author

Listed:
  • Madhubala Harji
  • Zalina Ismail
  • Thiba Chetty
  • Krishnaveni Letchumanan

Abstract

To date, plagiarism continues to be a widespread problem in higher education. Deemed to be endemic, researchers continue to examine various aspects of plagiarism, including students’ perception, practices, attitudes and reasons for plagiarism, in addressing this growing concern. Most studies, however, tend to examine these aspects independently. This paper reports on a study that examined both the students’ attitudes and reasons for plagiarism, particularly among the Technical and Non-Technical programme students. A questionnaire was administered to 120 students, i.e. 60 each from each programme to gather quantitative data on their attitudes and reasons for plagiarising. The study found that students in both groups hold negative attitudes towards plagiarism. They deem it synonymous to cheating in final examinations and advocate severe penalty to offenders who submit free downloaded or purchased articles. However, they disagree on being penalised for permitting their peers to plagiarise their work. Significant differences were found for the latter two attitudes between the groups. Albeit, disfavouring plagiarism, the two most cited reasons that compel students in both groups to plagiarise are their self-inadequacy in writing skills and poor time management, followed by the temptation and opportunity to plagiarise from the internet and to cope with the institutional load. With an understanding of these variables, all parties will be able to make more informed decisions in addressing this malpractice and upholding academic integrity.

Suggested Citation

  • Madhubala Harji & Zalina Ismail & Thiba Chetty & Krishnaveni Letchumanan, 2017. "Technical and Non-Technical Programme Students’ Attitudes and Reasons for Plagiarism," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(11), pages 141-141, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:10:y:2017:i:11:p:141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/71202/38869
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/71202
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Simkin & Alexander McLeod, 2010. "Why Do College Students Cheat?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 441-453, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Winrow, Brian, 2016. "Do perceptions of the utility of ethics affect academic cheating?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Yao-Chung Cheng & Fang-Chih Hung & Hung-Ming Hsu, 2021. "The Relationship between Academic Dishonesty, Ethical Attitude and Ethical Climate: The Evidence from Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Evan Polman & Lyn M. Van Swol & Paul R. Hoban, 2020. "Harbingers of foul play: A field study of gain/loss frames and regulatory fit in the NFL," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(3), pages 353-370, May.
    4. Tracy Manly & Lori Leonard & Cynthia Riemenschneider, 2015. "Academic Integrity in the Information Age: Virtues of Respect and Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 579-590, March.
    5. Jais Juraifa Bte & Asokumar Anusha, 2020. "Psychological Process, Social and Environmental Influence on Retirement Planning: Malaysian Energy Industry Perspective," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 134-153, June.
    6. Michał Krawczyk, 2012. "Sex, morals and exam cheating," Working Papers 2012-09, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    7. Timothy Paul Cronan & Jeffrey K. Mullins & David E. Douglas, 2018. "Further Understanding Factors that Explain Freshman Business Students’ Academic Integrity Intention and Behavior: Plagiarism and Sharing Homework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 197-220, January.
    8. Guillermina Tormo-Carbó & Elies Seguí-Mas & Victor Oltra, 2016. "Accounting Ethics in Unfriendly Environments: The Educational Challenge," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 161-175, April.
    9. Marian Eabrasu, 2020. "Cheating in Business: A Metaethical Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 519-532, March.
    10. Ballantine, J.A. & McCourt Larres, P. & Mulgrew, M., 2014. "Determinants of academic cheating behavior: The future for accountancy in Ireland," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 55-66.
    11. Yoav Gal & Adiv Gal, 2019. "Knowledge Bias: Neo-feudalism and Other Reasons to Avoid Sharing Knowledge by Knowledge Workers," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(2), pages 826-848, June.
    12. Ramlan Mustapha & Zaharah Hussin & Saedah Siraj & Ghazali Darusalam, 2016. "Does Islamic Religiosity Influence the Cheating Intention among Malaysian Muslim Students? A modified Theory of Planned Behavior," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(12), pages 389-406, December.
    13. Menatallah Darrag & Dina Mohamed Yousri & Ahmed Badreldin, 2012. "Academic Dishonesty in Egypt: A Nation-wide Study of Students in Higher Education," Working Papers 31, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    14. Nur Sayidah & Sulis Janu Hartati & Muhajir, 2020. "Academic Cheating and Characteristics of Accounting Students," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(1), pages 189-196, January.
    15. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    16. Roberta Fida & Carlo Tramontano & Marinella Paciello & Valerio Ghezzi & Claudio Barbaranelli, 2018. "Understanding the Interplay Among Regulatory Self-Efficacy, Moral Disengagement, and Academic Cheating Behaviour During Vocational Education: A Three-Wave Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 725-740, December.
    17. Fisher, Elizabeth & McLeod, Alexander J. & Savage, Arline & Simkin, Mark G., 2016. "Ghostwriters in the cloud," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 59-71.
    18. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:3:p:353-370 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Noorain Imbug & Sylvia Nabila Azwa Ambad & Imbarine Bujang, 2018. "The Influence of Customer Experience on Customer Loyalty in Telecommunication Industry," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(3), pages 103-116, March.
    20. Rafik I. Beekun & Nihat Alayoğlu & Ali Osman Öztürk & Mehmet Babacan & James W. Westerman, 2017. "Gauging the Ethicality of Students in Turkish Institutions of Higher Education," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 185-197, April.
    21. Joanne Jones & Gary Spraakman, 2011. "A Case of Academic Misconduct: Does Self‐Interest Rule?," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:10:y:2017:i:11:p:141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.