IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v14y2018i6p21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Filial Piety, Living Arrangements, and Well-being of Urban Older Adults in Southern China

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Tang
  • Nancy Hooyman

Abstract

This article examines the living arrangements and well-being of older adults in urban China. It draws upon the concept of filial piety and intergenerational care models to interpret findings regarding five different living arrangements for urban older adults- living alone (with a spouse or not), living with a son, living with a daughter, living in an institution (public or private), and other. Well-being is measured by activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and self-rated health questionnaires and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. The findings have implications for policy makers addressing living arrangements and community-based care services for older adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Tang & Nancy Hooyman, 2018. "Filial Piety, Living Arrangements, and Well-being of Urban Older Adults in Southern China," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:6:p:21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/73801/41778
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/73801
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:6:p:21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.