IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/riafin/v5y2012i3p69-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role Ambiguity Of Mexican Academic Researchers, Ambiguedad De Rol En Investigadores Mexicanos

Author

Listed:
  • Deneb Eli Magana Medina
  • Edith Georgina Surdez Perez
  • Carlos David Zetina Perez

Abstract

Role ambiguity is conceptualized as the lack of clarity in work. The purpose of the study is to present the levels of role ambiguity shown by research professors who belong to an academic body at the Universidad Juarez Autónoma de Tabasco in Mexico. The study design is non-experimental, descriptive and correlational transactional. A sample of 234 faculty researchers using stratified random sampling across all academics divisions participated in this study. The results showed that 23.5% of the population had a high level of role ambiguity. Ambiguity rules, processes and time, showed recurrent significant differences for most socio-demographic variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Deneb Eli Magana Medina & Edith Georgina Surdez Perez & Carlos David Zetina Perez, 2012. "Role Ambiguity Of Mexican Academic Researchers, Ambiguedad De Rol En Investigadores Mexicanos," Revista Internacional Administracion & Finanzas, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(3), pages 69-87.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibf:riafin:v:5:y:2012:i:3:p:69-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/riafin/riaf-v5n3-2012/RIAF-V5N3-2012-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Schulz & Christopher Auld, 2006. "Perceptions of Role Ambiguity by Chairpersons and Executive Directors in Queensland Sporting Organisations," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 183-201, May.
    2. Schulz, John & Auld, Christopher, 2006. "Perceptions of Role Ambiguity by Chairpersons and Executive Directors in Queensland Sporting Organisations," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 183-201, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferkins, Lesley & Shilbury, David, 2010. "Developing board strategic capability in sport organisations: The national-regional governing relationship," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 235-254, August.
    2. Greenhill, Jeff & Auld, Chris & Cuskelly, Graham & Hooper, Sue, 2009. "The impact of organisational factors on career pathways for female coaches," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 229-240, November.
    3. Jorge Alexandre Pereira Soares, 2016. "The Board President’s Role in Controlling the Decision-making Process in Voluntary Sports Organizations," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 13(Special), pages 57-79, November.
    4. Wicker, Pamela, 2017. "Volunteerism and volunteer management in sport," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 325-337.
    5. Schlesinger, T. & Klenk, C. & Nagel, S., 2015. "How do sport clubs recruit volunteers? Analyzing and developing a typology of decision-making processes on recruiting volunteers in sport clubs," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 193-206.
    6. A. Balduck & A. Van Rossem & M. Buelens, 2009. "Identifying Competencies Of Volunteer Board Members Of Community Sports Clubs," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 09/559, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    7. Dowling, Mathew & Edwards, Jonathon & Washington, Marvin, 2014. "Understanding the concept of professionalisation in sport management research," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 520-529.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ambiguity role; researchers; academic groups;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • M52 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Compensation and Compensation Methods and Their Effects

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:riafin:v:5:y:2012:i:3:p:69-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.