IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iag/reviea/v12y2015i2p117-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Approach Based On Big Data And Machine Learning For Optimizing The Management Of Agricultural Production Risks

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian KEVORCHIAN

    () (Institute of Agricultural Economics, Romanian Academy, Bucharest)

  • Camelia GAVRILESCU

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics, Romanian Academy, Bucharest)

  • Gheorghe HURDUZEU

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics, Romanian Academy, Bucharest)

Abstract

Colin Hay and Tony Payne developed the “great uncertainty” concept in order to synthesize certain aspects in relation to the dynamics of economic processes in the current period. They highlight three key elements that mark the structural changes of the moment and that generate incertitude: financial crisis, global economic power change and environmental threats, which bring about significant structural changes in the economy. At the same time, a technological paradigm change can be noticed at global level, characterized by an unprecedented growth of the “informational power” (computing power, storage power, high analysis capacity) oriented towards the creation of “anti-fragile” economic and administrative structures capable to develop rigorous analyses to outline the tendencies in this area dominated by uncertainty. The dual solutions in relation to hedging the agricultural commodities supplied by the OTC markets through the weather derived products and those supplied by the insurance companies based on weather indices are well known. We are facing a situation in which the hedging solutions based on OTC market products suffer from a deficit of image following the 2007/2008 crisis, and the solutions provided by the insurers raise the final price by up to 10% depending on the insurance market of each country, playing an important role on the reinsurance market as well. A unification variant of these markets is presented, providing for operational and production hedging for the farmers acting in a global agricultural industry worth 3 trillion USD, for which 150 billion observations is processed in connection with the soil types, summing up 200 TB of data each month. Weather events are simulated and risk is calculated on 4 × 4 km 2 areas. These data are combined with business data to support farmers’ management decisions. All these functionalities are supported by a package of technologies based on: NoSQL databases, including HBase, Hive, MySQL, Excel, by software service suppliers in cloud computing context such as Amazon S3, as well as applications delivered under SaaS regime. A recent report of the Global Institute Mc Kinsey refers to machine learning as an innovation stimulating technology. Being classified as a “silent technology”, this can be applied in modeling the weather phenomena to obtain the hedging level necessary to the production context. A composite index such as the Selyaninov index used in a technological context of machine learning type can bring about certain advantages in production risk evaluation. The paper investigates the capacity of certain technologies from the "Big Data” category to add value in the development of certain risk markets in order to obtain a proper hedging.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian KEVORCHIAN & Camelia GAVRILESCU & Gheorghe HURDUZEU, 2015. "An Approach Based On Big Data And Machine Learning For Optimizing The Management Of Agricultural Production Risks," Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 117-128.
  • Handle: RePEc:iag:reviea:v:12:y:2015:i:2:p:117-128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://www.ipe.ro/RePEc/iag/iag_pdf/AERD1502_117-128.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. KEVORCHIAN, Cristian & GAVRILESCU, Camelia & HURDUZEU, Gheorghe, 2013. "Qualitative Risk Coverage In Agriculture Through Derivative Financial Instruments Based On Selyaninov Indices," Studii Financiare (Financial Studies), Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 17(3), pages 19-32.
    2. Khandani, Amir E. & Kim, Adlar J. & Lo, Andrew W., 2010. "Consumer credit-risk models via machine-learning algorithms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 2767-2787, November.
    3. Benjamin Collier & Jerry Skees & Barry Barnett, 2009. "Weather Index Insurance and Climate Change: Opportunities and Challenges in Lower Income Countries," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 34(3), pages 401-424, July.
    4. Kevorchian, Cristian & Gavrilescu, Camelia & Hurduzeu, Gheorghe, 2014. "The Architecture of Informatics Systems for Farm Management – a Cloud Computing and Big Data Approach," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182844, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Apostolos Ampountolas & Titus Nyarko Nde & Paresh Date & Corina Constantinescu, 2021. "A Machine Learning Approach for Micro-Credit Scoring," Risks, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Vasilios Plakandaras & Periklis Gogas & Theophilos Papadimitriou & Rangan Gupta, 2016. "The Term Premium as a Leading Macroeconomic Indicator," Working Papers 201613, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    3. Tobias Götze & Marc Gürtler & Eileen Witowski, 2020. "Improving CAT bond pricing models via machine learning," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 428-446, September.
    4. Ashimwe, Olive, 2016. "An Economic Analysis Of Impact Of Weather Index-Based Crop Insurance On Household Income In Huye District Of Rwanda," Research Theses 265675, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    5. Aditya Kusuma & Bethanna Jackson & Ilan Noy, 2018. "A viable and cost-effective weather index insurance for rice in Indonesia," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 43(2), pages 186-218, September.
    6. Achtnicht Martin & Osberghaus Daniel, 2019. "The Demand for Index-Based Flood Insurance in a High-Income Country," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 217-242, May.
    7. Plakandaras, Vasilios & Papadimitriou, Theophilos & Gogas, Periklis, 2019. "Forecasting transportation demand for the U.S. market," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 195-214.
    8. Zhang, Jing & Brown, Colin & Waldron, Scott, 2017. "Case study analysis on household attitudes towards weather index crop insurance in rural China," 2017 Conference (61st), February 7-10, 2017, Brisbane, Australia 258683, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Peter Martey Addo & Dominique Guegan & Bertrand Hassani, 2018. "Credit Risk Analysis Using Machine and Deep Learning Models," Risks, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 6(2), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Jordà, Òscar & Taylor, Alan M., 2012. "The carry trade and fundamentals: Nothing to fear but FEER itself," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 74-90.
    11. Daniel Stein, 2018. "Dynamics of Demand for Rainfall Index Insurance: Evidence from a Commercial Product in India," World Bank Economic Review, World Bank Group, vol. 32(3), pages 692-708.
    12. Vasilios Plakandaras & Elie Bouri & Rangan Gupta, 2019. "Forecasting Bitcoin Returns: Is there a Role for the U.S. – China Trade War?," Working Papers 201980, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    13. Xiao Lin & W. Jean Kwon, 2020. "Application of parametric insurance in principle‐compliant and innovative ways," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 23(2), pages 121-150, June.
    14. Yiyan Huang & Cheuk Hang Leung & Xing Yan & Qi Wu & Nanbo Peng & Dongdong Wang & Zhixiang Huang, 2020. "The Causal Learning of Retail Delinquency," Papers 2012.09448, arXiv.org.
    15. Berge, Travis J., 2018. "Understanding survey-based inflation expectations," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 788-801.
    16. Neuberg Richard & Hannah Lauren, 2017. "Loan pricing under estimation risk," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 34(1-2), pages 69-87, June.
    17. Jesse Tack & Andrew Barkley & Lawton Nalley, 2014. "Heterogeneous effects of warming and drought on selected wheat variety yields," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 125(3), pages 489-500, August.
    18. Flood, Mark D. & Lemieux, Victoria L. & Varga, Margaret & William Wong, B.L., 2016. "The application of visual analytics to financial stability monitoring," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 180-197.
    19. Dougherty, John P. & Flatnes, Jon Einar & Gallenstein, Richard A. & Miranda, Mario J. & Sam, Abdoul G., 2020. "Climate change and index insurance demand: Evidence from a framed field experiment in Tanzania," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 155-184.
    20. Benjamin Collier & Jerry Skees, 2012. "Increasing the resilience of financial intermediaries through portfolio-level insurance against natural disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(1), pages 55-72, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    agriculture; weather risk; technologies; big data; machine learning;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iag:reviea:v:12:y:2015:i:2:p:117-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Corina Saman). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaacaro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.