IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2013i3p29-34.html

Scientific Grounds for Brand New Institutional Accounting Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Valeriy Zhuk

    (National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine)

Abstract

In up-to-date economics the accountant's significance is increasing. Accountancy overweighs other economic specializations in terms of both quantity and quality (by functional duties). The International Federation of Accountants, its national unions and International Accounting Standards Board are extending their influence on global economy development. In modern science the majority of economic problem research start from financial reporting, its impact on ensuring confidence, safety and controllability in social-and-economic space. However, the classic theories are not prepared for such enhancement of accounting importance and mission. They do not provide fundamental guidelines for efficient adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standards, job development standards and others (the latter has been illustrated by way of Ukraine and other CIS countries examples). In present day world accounting has become a significant social-and-business institution and its development in this capacity requires a brand new theory. The height of the u-to-date economic thought is the institutional theory. It has given the world several Nobel Prize winners and it is used effectively in social-and-economic policy of some flourishing countries. Institutional influence can be also found in contemporary accounting research studies. The new paradigm and theory objective is development of scientific base so that accounting can reach the level of significant social-and-economic institution, which would ensure confidence, understanding and controllability within national and global perspectives. The institutional theory has its aim in content and mission revision, function and subject specification, accounting objects extension and considering professional accountants institution as the principle element of accounting institution. The necessity of policy for adaptation of novations and innovations in reporting to national institualization environment specifics, usage of 'accounting engineering' and 'accounting imperialism' for more efficient development of accounting institution have been grounded. Notably, for readers awareness, the monograph of the 'Basics of Institualization Theory of Accounting' has been published and is available in the Russian language in Ukraine and the Russian Federation.

Suggested Citation

  • Valeriy Zhuk, 2013. "Scientific Grounds for Brand New Institutional Accounting Theory," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 29-34, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2013:i:3:p:29-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/83-naukove-ob-runtuvannya-potrebi-u-noviy-institucionalniy-teorii-buhgalterskogo-obliku.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/83/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eggertsson,Thrainn, 1990. "Economic Behavior and Institutions," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521348911, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Inna Herasymovych, 2017. "Mechanisms and Tools of Accounting and Financial Engineering in Enterprise Management," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 25-32, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. christoph Engel, 2005. "Voice over IP. Competition Policy and Regulation," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics 2005_26, Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics.
    2. Alexandra Benham & Lee Benham, 2010. "The Costs of Exchange," Chapters, in: Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Mwangi, Esther, 2006. "Subdividing the Commons: The Politics of Property Rights Transformation in Kenya’s Maasailand," CAPRi Working Papers 42510, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Gow, Hamish R. & Swinnen, Johan F.M., 1998. "How Foreign Direct Investment Has Stimulated Growth In The Central And Eastern European Agri-Food Sectors: Vertical Contracting And The Role Of Private Enforcement Capital," PRG Working Papers 31879, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance.
    5. Wang, Hui & Riedinger, Jeffrey & Jin, Songqing, 2015. "Land documents, tenure security and land rental development: Panel evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 220-235.
    6. Meina Cai & Ilia Murtazashvili & Jennifer Murtazashvili & Raufhon Salahodjaev, 2020. "Individualism and governance of the commons," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 175-195, July.
    7. Deslatte, Aaron & Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna & Tavares, António F. & Ślawska, Justyna & Karsznia, Izabela & Łukomska, Julita, 2022. "Land use institutions and social-ecological systems: A spatial analysis of local landscape changes in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    8. Tamara Todorova, 2004. "The Firm in the Context of the Theory of Transaction Costs," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 55-74.
    9. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    10. Richard Cornes & Todd Sandler, 1994. "Are Public Goods Myths?," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 6(3), pages 369-385, July.
    11. Caballero-Miguez, Gonzalo & Fernández-González, Raquel, 2015. "Institutional analysis, allocation of liabilities and third-party enforcement via courts: The case of the Prestige oil spill," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 90-101.
    12. Carruthers, Bruce G., 1995. "Accounting, ambiguity, and the new institutionalism," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 313-328, May.
    13. Peter T. Leeson & Colin Harris, 2018. "Testing rational choice theories of institutional change," Rationality and Society, , vol. 30(4), pages 420-431, November.
    14. Mwangi, Esther, 2007. "Subdividing the Commons: Distributional Conflict in the Transition from Collective to Individual Property Rights in Kenya's Maasailand," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 815-834, May.
    15. Seth W. Norton, 2003. "Economic Institutions and Human Well-Being: A Cross-National Analysis," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 23-40, Winter.
    16. Michaela Haase, 2015. "The cooperation of marketing theory and the ethic of responsibility: an analysis with focus on two views on value creation," Chapters, in: Handbook on Ethics and Marketing, chapter 7, pages 125-149, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Eckardt, Martina, 1999. "The Evolution of the German Tort Law in the 19th Century - An Economic Analysis of the Evolution of Law," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 23, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics.
    18. Bachev, Hrabrin, 1995. "Икономически Измерения На Аграрните Транзакции [Economic dimensions of agrarian transations]," MPRA Paper 76471, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Anna Klimina, 2013. "Placing the Analysis of Contemporary State Capitalism within an Evolutionary Discourse," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 545-554.
    20. Nguyen Nghia Bien, 2016. "Forest Management Systems in the Uplands of Vietnam: Social, Economic and Environmental Perspectives," EEPSEA Research Report rr2016052, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Apr 2016.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2013:i:3:p:29-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhii Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.