IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v6y2025i2p40-d1622731.html

Ethiopian Economic Liberalization Policy Domains and International Competitive Priorities: Nexus of Export Performance of Manufacturing Firms After 1991 Economic Reforms

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Ahmed Endris

    (Department of Marketing Management, College of Business and Economics, Arba Minch University, P.O. Box 21 Arba Minch, Ethiopia
    Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, Arba Minch University, P.O. Box 21 Arba Minch, Ethiopia)

  • Abebe Ejigu Alemu

    (Department of Logistics Management, International Maritime College Oman, National University of Science and Technology, Sohar P.O. Box 532, Oman)

  • Abiyot Tsegaye Kiberet

    (Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, Arba Minch University, P.O. Box 21 Arba Minch, Ethiopia)

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of Ethiopian economic liberalization policy and manufacturing firms’ international competitive priorities on the export performance after economic reforms in 1991. This study also aims to clarify how these economic reforms and the firm’s competitive priorities affect the international market export performance. This study further examines and identifies the most important variables that significantly affect export performance in relation to economic liberalization and the firm’s competitiveness. To achieve these objectives, both primary and secondary data were collected. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from 114 fully privatized manufacturing firms, utilizing a structured questionnaire with five Likert-scale items. The findings of this research indicate that law and order (LaO) and government intervention, incentive schemes, and trade openness have a significant relationship with the export performance of exporting firms in Ethiopia. This study also infers that firms must incorporate firm’s international competitive priorities’ cost, flexibility, and product quality as part of their competitive strategy. These competitive priority metrics limit export performance in terms of both subjective (e.g., export satisfaction) and quantitative (market share, profit) factors. This study concludes that economic liberalization and competitive priority measures are positive and have a significant relationship with the export performance of manufacturing firms in Ethiopia after 1991 reforms. The result also provides valuable insights for manufacturing firms and policymakers, highlighting the importance of economic liberalization in enhancing the export capabilities of privatized firms. These insights can guide the development of effective strategies to boost exports and foster sustainable economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Ahmed Endris & Abebe Ejigu Alemu & Abiyot Tsegaye Kiberet, 2025. "Ethiopian Economic Liberalization Policy Domains and International Competitive Priorities: Nexus of Export Performance of Manufacturing Firms After 1991 Economic Reforms," World, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:2:p:40-:d:1622731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/2/40/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/2/40/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L Alan Winters, 2004. "Trade Liberalisation and Economic Performance: An Overview," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 114(493), pages 4-21, February.
    2. Huy Quang Doan, 2019. "Trade, Institutional Quality and Income: Empirical Evidence for Sub-Saharan Africa," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Anindya Ghose & Arun Sundararajan, 2006. "Evaluating Pricing Strategy Using e-Commerce Data: Evidence and Estimation Challenges," Papers math/0609170, arXiv.org.
    4. Simeon Djankov, 1999. "The restructuring of insider‐dominated firms: A comparative analysis," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 7(2), pages 467-479, July.
    5. Romain Wacziarg & Karen Horn Welch, 2008. "Trade Liberalization and Growth: New Evidence," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 22(2), pages 187-231, June.
    6. Menji, Sisay, 2010. "Export Performance and Determinants in Ethiopia," MPRA Paper 29427, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. André Ribeiro Gonçalves & Rogério H Quintella, 2006. "The role of internal and external factors in the performance of brazilian companies and its evolution between 1990 and 2003," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 10(spe), pages 117-136.
    8. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    9. Thirlwall, Anthony P & Hussain, Mohammed Nureldin, 1982. "The Balance of Payments Constraint, Capital Flows and Growth Rate Differences between Developing Countries," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 498-510, November.
    10. Ousmanou Njikam, 2017. "Export market destination and performance: Firm-level evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of African Trade, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-19, March.
    11. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-01053609 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bühler, Stefan & Helm, Marco & Lechner, Michael, 2011. "Trade Liberalization and Growth: Plant-Level Evidence from Switzerland," Economics Working Paper Series 1133, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    2. Kose, M. Ayhan & Prasad, Eswar S. & Terrones, Marco E., 2006. "How do trade and financial integration affect the relationship between growth and volatility?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 176-202, June.
    3. Koopmann, Georg & Hoekstra, Ruth, 2010. "Aid for trade and the political economy of trade liberalization," HWWI Research Papers 2-22, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    4. Tommaso Nannicini & Andreas Billmeier, 2011. "Economies in Transition: How Important Is Trade Openness for Growth?," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 73(3), pages 287-314, June.
    5. Agapi Lambrini Somwaru, 2013. "Does trade liberalization and its associated increased economic activity affect permanently the value and pattern of trade flows?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(23), pages 3263-3277, August.
    6. Eswar S. Prasad & Kenneth Rogoff & Shang-Jin Wei & M. Ayhan Kose, 2007. "Financial Globalization, Growth and Volatility in Developing Countries," NBER Chapters, in: Globalization and Poverty, pages 457-516, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Yao‐Yu Chih & Ruby P. Kishan & Andrew Ojede, 2022. "Be good to thy neighbours: A spatial analysis of foreign direct investment and economic growth in sub‐Saharan Africa," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 657-701, March.
    8. Nana, Ibrahim & Motelle, Sephooko Ignatius & Starnes, Susan K., 2023. "The Trade-Growth Nexus: Evidence of Causality from Innovative Instruments for Trade," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10645, The World Bank.
    9. Bernard Hoekman & Marco Sanfilippo & Filippo Santi & Rohit Ticku, 2025. "Trade, productivity, and services input intensity," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 161(1), pages 309-337, February.
    10. Douglas A. Irwin, 2019. "Does Trade Reform Promote Economic Growth? A Review of Recent Evidence," Working Paper Series WP19-9, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    11. Grieben, Wolf-Heimo & Sener, Fuat, 2009. "Globalization, rent protection institutions, and going alone in freeing trade," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 1042-1065, November.
    12. AkIn, Cigdem & Kose, M. Ayhan, 2008. "Changing nature of North-South linkages: Stylized facts and explanations," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 1-28, February.
    13. Sundar Ponnusamy, 2022. "Export specialization, trade liberalization and economic growth: a synthetic control analysis," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 637-669, August.
    14. Sudip Ranjan Basu, 2008. "A new way to link development to institutions,policies and geography," IHEID Working Papers 04-2008, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies, revised Mar 2008.
    15. Edgar Demetrio Tovar-Garcia & Carlos A. Carrasco, 2019. "The Balance of Payments and Russian Economic Growth," HSE Economic Journal, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 23(4), pages 524-541.
    16. Kym Anderson, 2005. "On the Virtues of Multilateral Trade Negotiations," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 81(255), pages 414-438, December.
    17. Rabah Arezki & Alou Adesse Dama & Grégoire Rota-Graziosi, 2021. "Working Paper 349 - Revisiting the Relationship between Trade Liberalization and Taxation," Working Paper Series 2475, African Development Bank.
    18. Antonio Martuscelli & Michael Gasiorek, 2019. "Regional Integration And Poverty: A Review Of The Transmission Channels And The Evidence," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 431-457, April.
    19. L. Alan Winters & Antonio Martuscelli, 2014. "Trade Liberalization and Poverty: What Have We Learned in a Decade?," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 6(1), pages 493-512, October.
    20. Bretschger, Lucas, 2010. "Taxes, mobile capital, and economic dynamics in a globalizing world," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 594-605, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:2:p:40-:d:1622731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.