IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jwaste/v1y2023i3p41-710d1218919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential for Thermo-Chemical Conversion of Solid Waste in Canada to Fuel, Heat, and Electricity

Author

Listed:
  • Yuxiang Yao

    (Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4E4, Canada)

  • Chandhini Ramu

    (Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4E4, Canada)

  • Allison Procher

    (Energy, Mining and Environment, National Research Council of Canada, 1200 Montreal Rd., Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada)

  • Jennifer Littlejohns

    (Energy, Mining and Environment, National Research Council of Canada, 1200 Montreal Rd., Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada)

  • Josephine M. Hill

    (Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4E4, Canada)

  • James W. Butler

    (Energy, Mining and Environment, National Research Council of Canada, 1200 Montreal Rd., Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada)

Abstract

The amount of municipal solid waste (MSW) generation in Canada was 34 million tonnes in 2018. Responsible waste management is challenging, but essential to protect the environment and to prevent the contamination of the ecosystem on which we rely. Landfilling is the least desirable option, and diversion through thermo-chemical conversion to value-added products is a good option for difficult-to-recycle waste. In this study, the amounts, moisture contents, heating values, and compositions of municipally collected solid waste produced in Canada are reported, a classification that is suitable for conversion purposes is proposed, and the potential for thermo-chemical conversion is determined. Much of the waste generated in Canada is suitable for being converted, and its potential for heat or electricity generation was determined to be 193 PJ/yr and 37 TWh/y, respectively. The GHG emissions that are saved through diversion from the landfill, while assuming the generated heat or electricity offsets natural gas combustion, gives a GHG reduction of 10.6 MMTCO 2 E/yr or 1.6% of Canada’s GHG emissions. The blending of waste in feedstocks can have varying effects on the amount of biogenic CO 2 produced per unit energy in the feedstock, which is an important consideration for new projects. Other considerations include the heating values, moisture contents, and contaminant levels in the waste.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuxiang Yao & Chandhini Ramu & Allison Procher & Jennifer Littlejohns & Josephine M. Hill & James W. Butler, 2023. "Potential for Thermo-Chemical Conversion of Solid Waste in Canada to Fuel, Heat, and Electricity," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jwaste:v:1:y:2023:i:3:p:41-710:d:1218919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2813-0391/1/3/41/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2813-0391/1/3/41/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Watson, Jamison & Lu, Jianwen & de Souza, Raquel & Si, Buchun & Zhang, Yuanhui & Liu, Zhidan, 2019. "Effects of the extraction solvents in hydrothermal liquefaction processes: Biocrude oil quality and energy conversion efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 189-197.
    2. Istrate, Ioan-Robert & Medina-Martos, Enrique & Galvez-Martos, Jose-Luis & Dufour, Javier, 2021. "Assessment of the energy recovery potential of municipal solid waste under future scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    3. Michela Lucian & Luca Fiori, 2017. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Waste Biomass: Process Design, Modeling, Energy Efficiency and Cost Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Gollakota, A.R.K. & Kishore, Nanda & Gu, Sai, 2018. "A review on hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1378-1392.
    5. Pietro Romano & Nicola Stampone & Gabriele Di Giacomo, 2023. "Evolution and Prospects of Hydrothermal Carbonization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-11, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kandasamy, Sabariswaran & Zhang, Bo & He, Zhixia & Chen, Haitao & Feng, Huan & Wang, Qian & Wang, Bin & Ashokkumar, Veeramuthu & Siva, Subramanian & Bhuvanendran, Narayanamoorthy & Krishnamoorthi, M., 2020. "Effect of low-temperature catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of Spirulina platensis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. Liu, Quan & Zhang, Guanyu & Liu, Mingyang & Kong, Ge & Xu, Ruolan & Han, Lujia & Zhang, Xuesong, 2022. "Fast hydrothermal liquefaction coupled with homogeneous catalysts to valorize livestock manure for enhanced biocrude oil and hydrochar production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 521-533.
    3. Ankit Mathanker & Snehlata Das & Deepak Pudasainee & Monir Khan & Amit Kumar & Rajender Gupta, 2021. "A Review of Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Biomass for Biofuels Production with a Special Focus on the Effect of Process Parameters, Co-Solvents, and Extraction Solvents," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-60, August.
    4. Komeil Kohansal & Kamaldeep Sharma & Saqib Sohail Toor & Eliana Lozano Sanchez & Joscha Zimmermann & Lasse Aistrup Rosendahl & Thomas Helmer Pedersen, 2021. "Bio-Crude Production Improvement during Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Biopulp by Simultaneous Application of Alkali Catalysts and Aqueous Phase Recirculation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Ahmad, Fiaz & Silva, Edson Luiz & Varesche, Maria Bernadete Amâncio, 2018. "Hydrothermal processing of biomass for anaerobic digestion – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 108-124.
    6. Deliang Kong & Changbin Yuan & Maojiong Cao & Zihan Wang & Yuanhui Zhang & Zhidan Liu, 2023. "An Ecological Toilet System Incorporated with a Hydrothermal Liquefaction Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, April.
    7. Hongbo Du, & Deng, Fang & Kommalapati, Raghava R. & Amarasekara, Ananda S., 2020. "Iron based catalysts in biomass processing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Francesco Miccio & Elettra Papa & Annalisa Natali Murri & Elena Landi & Matteo Minelli, 2021. "Pressurized Steam Conversion of Biomass Residues for Liquid Hydrocarbons Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, February.
    9. Kawale, Harshal D. & Kishore, Nanda, 2020. "Comparative study on pyrolysis of Delonix Regia, Pinewood sawdust and their co-feed for plausible bio-fuels production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    10. Mohammed, Habu Iyodo & Garba, Kabir & Ahmed, Saeed I. & Abubakar, Lawan G., 2022. "Thermodynamics and kinetics of Doum (Hyphaene thebaica) shell using thermogravimetric analysis: A study on pyrolysis pathway to produce bioenergy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1275-1285.
    11. Genel, Salih & Durak, Halil & Durak, Emre Demirer & Güneş, Hasret & Genel, Yaşar, 2023. "Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass with molybdenum, aluminum, cobalt metal powder catalysts and evaluation of wastewater by fungus cultivation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 20-32.
    12. Ye, Lian & Zhang, Jianliang & Wang, Guangwei & Wang, Chen & Mao, Xiaoming & Ning, Xiaojun & Zhang, Nan & Teng, Haipeng & Li, Jinhua & Wang, Chuan, 2023. "Feasibility analysis of plastic and biomass hydrochar for blast furnace injection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    13. Mei Yin Ong & Nor-Insyirah Syahira Abdul Latif & Hui Yi Leong & Bello Salman & Pau Loke Show & Saifuddin Nomanbhay, 2019. "Characterization and Analysis of Malaysian Macroalgae Biomass as Potential Feedstock for Bio-Oil Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Sharma, Nishesh & Jaiswal, Krishna Kumar & Kumar, Vinod & Vlaskin, Mikhail S. & Nanda, Manisha & Rautela, Indra & Tomar, Mahipal Singh & Ahmad, Waseem, 2021. "Effect of catalyst and temperature on the quality and productivity of HTL bio-oil from microalgae: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 810-822.
    15. René A. Garrido & Camila Lagos & Carolina Luna & Jaime Sánchez & Georgina Díaz, 2021. "Study of the Potential Uses of Hydrochar from Grape Pomace and Walnut Shells Generated from Hydrothermal Carbonization as an Alternative for the Revalorization of Agri-Waste in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-10, November.
    16. Sooraj Kumar & Suhail Ahmed Soomro & Khanji Harijan & Mohammad Aslam Uqaili & Laveet Kumar, 2023. "Advancements of Biochar-Based Catalyst for Improved Production of Biodiesel: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    17. Antonios Nazos & Dorothea Politi & Georgios Giakoumakis & Dimitrios Sidiras, 2022. "Simulation and Optimization of Lignocellulosic Biomass Wet- and Dry-Torrefaction Process for Energy, Fuels and Materials Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-35, November.
    18. Jiheon Jun & Yi-Feng Su & James R. Keiser & John E. Wade & Michael D. Kass & Jack R. Ferrell & Earl Christensen & Mariefel V. Olarte & Dino Sulejmanovic, 2022. "Corrosion Compatibility of Stainless Steels and Nickel in Pyrolysis Biomass-Derived Oil at Elevated Storage Temperatures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Pietro Romano & Nicola Stampone & Gabriele Di Giacomo, 2023. "Evolution and Prospects of Hydrothermal Carbonization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-11, March.
    20. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jwaste:v:1:y:2023:i:3:p:41-710:d:1218919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.