IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jtourh/v6y2025i2p81-d1654779.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Destination Buzzers: Netnographying Digital Nomads

Author

Listed:
  • Ioulia Poulaki

    (Department of Business Administration, University of the Aegean, 82132 Chios, Greece)

  • Eirini Vlassi

    (Department of Tourism Economics and Management, University of the Aegean, 82132 Chios, Greece)

  • Eleni Mavragani

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Macedonia, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Eleftheria Chatzimichali

    (Tourism Business Administration Postgraduate Program, Neapolis University Pafos, 8042 Pafos, Cyprus)

  • Andreas Papatheodorou

    (Department of Tourism Economics and Management, University of the Aegean, 82132 Chios, Greece)

Abstract

A new way of life and work—digital nomadism—is increasingly appealing to a growing global workforce, while many destinations are beginning to view this form of tourism not only as an economic opportunity but also as a strategic tool for mitigating seasonality and promoting sustainable destination development. This paper aims to identify the key criteria that digital nomads consider when selecting a temporary residence base, contributing to the growing body of research on digital nomadism by analysing the relative impact of various factors influencing destination choice. The originality of this study lies in its mixed-method approach, which combines secondary and primary data through a netnographic analysis of online communities and semi-structured interviews with digital nomads. Findings from the secondary data highlight the cost of living, internet quality, and lifestyle offerings of a destination as the most influential factors in nomadic decision-making. Additionally, primary data further illustrate the hierarchy of digital nomads’ needs and preferences, which are classified and prioritised based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. These insights carry significant implications for destination managers and tourism stakeholders. Understanding and responding to the evolving expectations of digital nomads can help destinations not only attract this emerging market segment but also design policies and infrastructure that align with principles of sustainable tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioulia Poulaki & Eirini Vlassi & Eleni Mavragani & Eleftheria Chatzimichali & Andreas Papatheodorou, 2025. "Destination Buzzers: Netnographying Digital Nomads," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-29, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:6:y:2025:i:2:p:81-:d:1654779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/6/2/81/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/6/2/81/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Andreas J. Reuschl, 2018. "Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 317-334, January.
    2. Dave Cook, 2020. "The freedom trap: digital nomads and the use of disciplining practices to manage work/leisure boundaries," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 355-390, September.
    3. Kozinets, Robert V., 1999. "E-tribalized marketing?: the strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 252-264, June.
    4. Fabiola Mancinelli, 2020. "Digital nomads: freedom, responsibility and the neoliberal order," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 417-437, September.
    5. Ioulia Poulaki & Eleni Mavragani & Alexandra Kaziani & Eleftheria Chatzimichali, 2023. "Digital Nomads: Advances in Hospitality and Destination Attractiveness," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiberius, Victor & Chen, Nicole & Bartels, Mirko & Oelsnitz, Dietrich von der, 2024. "Breaking out! A netnography study on motives of a digital nomad lifestyle," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Ulrike Gretzel & Matthias Fuchs & Rodolfo Baggio & Wolfram Hoepken & Rob Law & Julia Neidhardt & Juho Pesonen & Markus Zanker & Zheng Xiang, 2020. "e-Tourism beyond COVID-19: a call for transformative research," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 187-203, June.
    3. Linao, Patricia Aida & Heimtun, Bente & Morgan, Nigel, 2024. "Digital nomadism, gender and racial power relations," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Hakan Saraç, 2024. "Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on the Digital Nomad with VOSviewer," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, issue 87, pages 58-68, December.
    5. Alexandra Rese & Lars Görmar & Alena Herbig, 2022. "Social networks in coworking spaces and individual coworker’s creativity," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 391-428, February.
    6. Bednorz, Jan, 2024. "Working from anywhere? Work from here! Approaches to attract digital nomads," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    7. Lacárcel, Francisco Javier S. & Huete, Raquel & Zerva, Konstantina, 2024. "Decoding digital nomad destination decisions through user-generated content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    8. Blair Wang & Daniel Schlagwein & Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic & Michael C. Cahalane, 2025. "‘Emancipation’ in Digital Nomadism vs in the Nation-State: A Comparative Analysis of Idealtypes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(1), pages 35-68, April.
    9. Inge Hermann & Cody Morris Paris, 2020. "Digital Nomadism: the nexus of remote working and travel mobility," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 329-334, September.
    10. Juan Parreño-Castellano & Josefina Domínguez-Mujica & Claudio Moreno-Medina, 2022. "Reflections on Digital Nomadism in Spain during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Effect of Policy and Place," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Valentina Daniela N. CONSTANTIN & Roxana-Denisa G. STOENESCU, 2014. "The Impact Of Origin On Creating A Cult Brand: The Case Of Apple," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 3, pages 123-134, April.
    12. Qu, Hailin & Lee, Haeyoung, 2011. "Travelers’ social identification and membership behaviors in online travel community," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1262-1270.
    13. Manuel Sánchez-Pérez & Nuria Rueda-López & María Belén Marín-Carrillo & Eduardo Terán-Yépez, 2021. "Theoretical dilemmas, conceptual review and perspectives disclosure of the sharing economy: a qualitative analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 1849-1883, October.
    14. Lucas DuPriest, 2019. "Coworking Spaces in La Paz, Bolivia: Urban Effects and Potential Creation of New Opportunities for Local Economic Development," Development Research Working Paper Series 07/2019, Institute for Advanced Development Studies.
    15. Caitlin McLaughlin & Kai Haverila & Matti Haverila, 2022. "Gratifications sought versus gratifications achieved in online brand communities: satisfaction and motives of lurkers and posters," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 190-207, March.
    16. Viorica Mirela Stefan-Duicu & Mihaela Sudacevschi, 2023. "Placement of the Professional Judgment in the Current Remote Working Environment," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 11(1), pages 126-132, May.
    17. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Ratzmann, Martin & Kraus, Sascha, 2021. "Anti-aging: How innovation is shaped by firm age and mutual knowledge creation in an alliance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 422-429.
    18. Tribe, John & Mkono, Muchazondida, 2017. "Not such smart tourism? The concept of e-lienation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 105-115.
    19. Howell, Travis, 2022. "Coworking spaces: An overview and research agenda," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    20. Lee, Kyungwon & Hakstian, Anne-Marie & Williams, Jerome D., 2021. "Creating a world where anyone can belong anywhere: Consumer equality in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 221-231.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:6:y:2025:i:2:p:81-:d:1654779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.