IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i2p1459-1482d45220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coupling Intensive Land Use and Landscape Ecological Security for Urban Sustainability: An Integrated Socioeconomic Data and Spatial Metrics Analysis in Hangzhou City

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoteng Cen

    (School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China
    Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Earth Institute, Columbia University, 61 Route 9W, P.O. Box 1000, Palisades, NY 10964, USA)

  • Cifang Wu

    (School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China)

  • Xiaoshi Xing

    (Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Earth Institute, Columbia University, 61 Route 9W, P.O. Box 1000, Palisades, NY 10964, USA)

  • Ming Fang

    (School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China)

  • Zhuoma Garang

    (School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China)

  • Yizhou Wu

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China)

Abstract

Despite the unprecedented rate of urbanization throughout the world, human society is still facing the challenge of coordinating urban socioeconomic development and ecological conservation. In this article, we integrated socioeconomic data and spatial metrics to investigate the coupling relationship between intensive land use (ILU) system and landscape ecological security (LES) system for urban sustainable development, and to determine how these systems interact with each other. The values of ILU and LES were first calculated according to two evaluation subsystems under the pressure-state-response (PSR) framework. A coupling model was then established to analyze the coupling relationship within these two subsystems. The results showed that the levels of both subsystems were generally increasing, but there were several fluctuation changes in LES. The interaction in each system was time lagged; urban land use/cover change (LUCC) and ecosystem transformation were determined by political business cycles and influenced by specific factors. The coupling relationship underwent a coordinated development mode from 1992–2012. From the findings we concluded that the coupling system maintained a stable condition and underwent evolving threshold values. The integrated ILU and LES system was a coupling system in which subsystems were related to each other and internal elements had mutual effects. Finally, it was suggested that our results provided a multi-level interdisciplinary perspective on linking socioeconomic-ecological systems. The implications for urban sustainable development were also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoteng Cen & Cifang Wu & Xiaoshi Xing & Ming Fang & Zhuoma Garang & Yizhou Wu, 2015. "Coupling Intensive Land Use and Landscape Ecological Security for Urban Sustainability: An Integrated Socioeconomic Data and Spatial Metrics Analysis in Hangzhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:1459-1482:d:45220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/2/1459/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/2/1459/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten & Kirchert, Daniel & Pan, Jiancheng, 2002. "Disparities in Chinese economic development: approaches on different levels of aggregation," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 31-54, April.
    2. Kreuter, Urs P. & Harris, Heather G. & Matlock, Marty D. & Lacey, Ronald E., 2001. "Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 333-346, December.
    3. Gabriel, Steven A. & Faria, Jose A. & Moglen, Glenn E., 2006. "A multiobjective optimization approach to smart growth in land development," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 212-248, September.
    4. Miller, John S. & Hoel, Lester A., 2002. "The "smart growth" debate: best practices for urban transportation planning," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Zhang, Jianjun & Fu, Meichen & Zhang, Zhongya & Tao, Jin & Fu, Wei, 2014. "A trade-off approach of optimal land allocation between socio-economic development and ecological stability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 175-187.
    6. Li, Yangfan & Sun, Xiang & Zhu, Xiaodong & Cao, Huhua, 2010. "An early warning method of landscape ecological security in rapid urbanizing coastal areas and its application in Xiamen, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(19), pages 2251-2260.
    7. Mike Hodson & Simon Marvin, 2009. "‘Urban Ecological Security’: A New Urban Paradigm?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 193-215, March.
    8. Martin Herold & Joseph Scepan & Keith C Clarke, 2002. "The Use of Remote Sensing and Landscape Metrics to Describe Structures and Changes in Urban Land Uses," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(8), pages 1443-1458, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu Gan & Yuanyuan Wang & Yusheng Wang & Benjamin Lev & Wenjing Shen & Wen Jiang, 2021. "Coupling coordination analysis with data-driven technology for disaster–economy–ecology system: an empirical study in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(3), pages 2123-2153, July.
    2. Xin Cheng & Hua Shao & Yang Li & Chao Shen & Peipei Liang, 2019. "Urban Land Intensive Use Evaluation Study Based on Nighttime Light—A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Ning Xu & Desen Zhao & Wenjie Zhang & He Zhang & Wanxu Chen & Min Ji & Ming Liu, 2022. "Innovation-Driven Development and Urban Land Low-Carbon Use Efficiency: A Policy Assessment from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Onggarbek Alipbeki & Gauhar Mussaif & Chaimgul Alipbekova & Aizada Kapassova & Pavel Grossul & Meirzhan Aliyev & Nursultan Mineyev, 2023. "Untangling the Integral Impact of Land Use Change, Economic, Ecological and Social Factors on the Development of Burabay District (Kazakhstan) during the Period 1999–2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-36, May.
    5. Yangfan Zhou & Lijie Pu & Ming Zhu, 2020. "Coastal Landscape Vulnerability Analysis in Eastern China—Based on Land-Use Change in Jiangsu Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Yanli Gao & Hongbo Li & Yan Song, 2021. "Interaction Relationship between Urbanization and Land Use Multifunctionality: Evidence from Han River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Ji Chai & Zhanqi Wang & Hongwei Zhang, 2017. "Integrated Evaluation of Coupling Coordination for Land Use Change and Ecological Security: A Case Study in Wuhan City of Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Yu Han & Chaoyue Yu & Zhe Feng & Hanchu Du & Caisi Huang & Kening Wu, 2021. "Construction and Optimization of Ecological Security Pattern Based on Spatial Syntax Classification—Taking Ningbo, China, as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Yi Lu & Xiangrong Wang & Yujing Xie & Kun Li & Yiyang Xu, 2016. "Integrating Future Land Use Scenarios to Evaluate the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Landscape Ecological Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Yiqun Shang & Dongya Liu & Yi Chen, 2022. "Evaluation of Urban Intensive Land Use Degree with GEE Support: A Case Study in the Pearl River Delta Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Qian Lin & Jiaying Mao & Jiansheng Wu & Weifeng Li & Jian Yang, 2016. "Ecological Security Pattern Analysis Based on InVEST and Least-Cost Path Model: A Case Study of Dongguan Water Village," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Jun Fu & Rui Ding & Yilin Zhang & Tao Zhou & Yiming Du & Yuqi Zhu & Linyu Du & Lina Peng & Jian Zou & Wenqian Xiao, 2022. "The Spatial-Temporal Transition and Influencing Factors of Green and Low-Carbon Utilization Efficiency of Urban Land in China under the Goal of Carbon Neutralization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-25, December.
    13. Jingyi Wang & Kaisi Sun & Jiupai Ni & Deti Xie, 2020. "Evaluation and Factor Analysis of the Intensive Use of Urban Land Based on Technical Efficiency Measurement—A Case Study of 38 Districts and Counties in Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Chunzhu Wei & Mark Padgham & Pablo Cabrera Barona & Thomas Blaschke, 2017. "Scale-Free Relationships between Social and Landscape Factors in Urban Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Fei Wang & Ning Gu, 2021. "Impact of ecological security on urban sustainability in Western China—A case study of Xi’an," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1314-1339, June.
    16. Chuyu Xia & Yan Li & Yanmei Ye & Zhou Shi, 2016. "An Integrated Approach to Explore the Relationship Among Economic, Construction Land Use, and Ecology Subsystems in Zhejiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-20, May.
    17. Jian Peng & Minli Zong & Yi'na Hu & Yanxu Liu & Jiansheng Wu, 2015. "Assessing Landscape Ecological Risk in a Mining City: A Case Study in Liaoyuan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Haocong Wang & Kening Wu & Zhe Feng & Huafu Zhao & Hua Ai & Chao Meng, 2023. "Evaluation of Urban Commercial Land Use Intensification Based on Land Parcels: Taking Wuxi City as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Tianyue Ma & Jing Li & Shuang Bai & Fangzhe Chang & Zhai Jiang & Xingguang Yan & Jiahao Shao, 2022. "Optimization and Construction of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Natural and Cultivated Land Disturbance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Fachao Liang & Mengdi Bai & Qiyu Hu & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2022. "Ecological Security and Ecosystem Quality: A Case Study of Xia-Zhang-Quan Metropolitan Area in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun Yang & Gui Jin & Xianjin Huang & Kun Chen & Hao Meng, 2018. "How to Measure Urban Land Use Intensity? A Perspective of Multi-Objective Decision in Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Yanjie Zhang & Wei Song & Shun Fu & Dazhi Yang, 2020. "Decoupling of Land Use Intensity and Ecological Environment in Gansu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Xiaojun Ye & Lingyun Fan & Cheng Lei, 2023. "Intensive-Use-Oriented Performance Evaluation and Optimization of Rural Industrial Land: A Case Study of Wujiang District, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Haocong Wang & Kening Wu & Zhe Feng & Huafu Zhao & Hua Ai & Chao Meng, 2023. "Evaluation of Urban Commercial Land Use Intensification Based on Land Parcels: Taking Wuxi City as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Linyu Xu & Hao Yin & Zhaoxue Li & Shun Li, 2014. "Land Ecological Security Evaluation of Guangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten & Libman, Alexander & Xiaofan, Yu, 2010. "State and market integration in China: A spatial econometrics approach to 'local protectionism'," Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series 137, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management.
    7. Srijana Shrestha & Khem Narayan Poudyal & Nawraj Bhattarai & Mohan B. Dangi & John J. Boland, 2022. "An Assessment of the Impact of Land Use and Land Cover Change on the Degradation of Ecosystem Service Values in Kathmandu Valley Using Remote Sensing and GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Jiaxing Cui & Xuesong Kong & Jing Chen & Jianwei Sun & Yuanyuan Zhu, 2021. "Spatially Explicit Evaluation and Driving Factor Identification of Land Use Conflict in Yangtze River Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Karolina Isaksson & Satu Heikkinen, 2018. "Sustainability Transitions at the Frontline. Lock-in and Potential for Change in the Local Planning Arena," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Dan Yu & Dongyan Wang & Wenbo Li & Shuhan Liu & Yuanli Zhu & Wenjun Wu & Yongheng Zhou, 2018. "Decreased Landscape Ecological Security of Peri-Urban Cultivated Land Following Rapid Urbanization: An Impediment to Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Bingkui Qiu & Shasha Lu & Min Zhou & Lu Zhang & Yu Deng & Ci Song & Zuo Zhang, 2015. "A Hybrid Inexact Optimization Method for Land-Use Allocation in Association with Environmental/Ecological Requirements at a Watershed Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-25, April.
    12. Gabriel, Steven A. & Faria, Jose A. & Moglen, Glenn E., 2006. "A multiobjective optimization approach to smart growth in land development," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 212-248, September.
    13. Reza Taromi & Michael DuRoss & Bintong Chen & Ardeshir Faghri & Mingxin Li & Tracy DeLiberty, 2015. "A multiobjective land development optimization model: the case of New Castle County, Delaware," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 277-304, April.
    14. Duy X. Tran & Diane Pearson & Alan Palmer & David Gray, 2020. "Developing a Landscape Design Approach for the Sustainable Land Management of Hill Country Farms in New Zealand," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-29, June.
    15. Vanesa Castán Broto & Harriet Bulkeley, 2013. "Maintaining Climate Change Experiments: Urban Political Ecology and the Everyday Reconfiguration of Urban Infrastructure," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1934-1948, November.
    16. Xingjian Liu & Ying Long, 2016. "Automated identification and characterization of parcels with OpenStreetMap and points of interest," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(2), pages 341-360, March.
    17. Tariq Aziz & Alain-Désiré Nimubona & Philippe Van Cappellen, 2023. "Comparative Valuation of Three Ecosystem Services in a Canadian Watershed Using Global, Regional, and Local Unit Values," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Michael Johnson & David Turcotte & Felicia Sullivan, 2010. "What Foreclosed Homes Should a Municipality Purchase to Stabilize Vulnerable Neighborhoods?," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 363-388, September.
    19. Evan Elderbrock & Chris Enright & Kathryn A. Lynch & Alexandra R. Rempel, 2020. "A Guide to Public Green Space Planning for Urban Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-23, October.
    20. J. Carl Ureta & Lucas Clay & Marzieh Motallebi & Joan Ureta, 2020. "Quantifying the Landscape’s Ecological Benefits—An Analysis of the Effect of Land Cover Change on Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:1459-1482:d:45220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.