IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i2p1292-1307d45154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic Analysis of a Power Plant Integrated with Fogging Inlet Cooling and a Biomass Gasification

Author

Listed:
  • Hassan Athari

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ataturk, Erzurum 25240, Turkey)

  • Saeed Soltani

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51666-16471, Iran)

  • Marc A. Rosen

    (Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada)

  • Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51666-16471, Iran)

  • Tatiana Morosuk

    (Institute for Energy Engineering, Technische Universität Berlin, Marchstr 18, 10587 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Biomass energy and especially biofuels produced by biomass gasification are clean and renewable options for power plants. Also, on hot days the performance of gas turbines decreases substantially, a problem that can be mitigated by fog cooling. In the present paper, a biomass-integrated fogging steam injected gas turbine cycle is analyzed with energy and exergy methods. It is observed that (1) increasing the compressor pressure ratio raises the air flow rate in the plant but reduces the biomass flow rate; (2) increasing the gas turbine inlet temperature decreases the air and biomass flow rates; (3) increasing the compressor pressure ratio raises the energy and exergy efficiencies, especially at lower pressure ratios; (4) increasing the gas turbine inlet temperature raises both efficiencies; and (5) overspray increases the energy efficiency and net cycle power slightly. The gas turbine exhibits the highest exergy efficiency of the cycle components and the combustor the lowest. A comparison of the cycle with similar cycles fired by natural gas and differently configured cycles fueled by biomass shows that the cycle with natural gas firing has an energy efficiency 18 percentage points above the biomass fired cycle, and that steam injection increases the energy efficiency about five percentage points relative to the cycle without steam injection. Also, the influence of steam injection on energy efficiency is more significant than fog cooling.

Suggested Citation

  • Hassan Athari & Saeed Soltani & Marc A. Rosen & Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Tatiana Morosuk, 2015. "Thermodynamic Analysis of a Power Plant Integrated with Fogging Inlet Cooling and a Biomass Gasification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:1292-1307:d:45154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/2/1292/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/2/1292/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Kyoung Hoon & Perez-Blanco, Horacio, 2007. "Potential of regenerative gas-turbine systems with high fogging compression," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 16-28, January.
    2. Tsatsaronis, George & Pisa, Javier, 1994. "Exergoeconomic evaluation and optimization of energy systems — application to the CGAM problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 287-321.
    3. Soltani, S. & Yari, M. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Morosuk, T. & Rosen, M.A., 2013. "Advanced exergy analysis applied to an externally-fired combined-cycle power plant integrated with a biomass gasification unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 775-780.
    4. Park, S.R. & Pandey, A.K. & Tyagi, V.V. & Tyagi, S.K., 2014. "Energy and exergy analysis of typical renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 105-123.
    5. Rodrigues, Monica & Faaij, Andre P.C. & Walter, Arnaldo, 2003. "Techno-economic analysis of co-fired biomass integrated gasification/combined cycle systems with inclusion of economies of scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 1229-1258.
    6. Klimantos, P. & Koukouzas, N. & Katsiadakis, A. & Kakaras, E., 2009. "Air-blown biomass gasification combined cycles (BGCC): System analysis and economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 708-714.
    7. Ehyaei, M.A. & Mozafari, A. & Alibiglou, M.H., 2011. "Exergy, economic & environmental (3E) analysis of inlet fogging for gas turbine power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 6851-6861.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yasmeen, Rizwana & Zhaohui, Cui & Hassan Shah, Wasi Ul & Kamal, Muhammad Abdul & Khan, Anwar, 2022. "Exploring the role of biomass energy consumption, ecological footprint through FDI and technological innovation in B&R economies: A simultaneous equation approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    2. Leonel Jorge Ribeiro Nunes & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias, 2019. "Technological Innovation in Biomass Energy for the Sustainable Growth of Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Yuting Wu & Ruiping Zhi & Biao Lei & Wei Wang & Jingfu Wang & Guoqiang Li & Huan Wang & Chongfang Ma, 2016. "Slide Valves for Single-Screw Expanders Working Under Varied Operating Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Athari, Hassan & Soltani, Saeed & Bölükbaşi, Abdurrahim & Rosen, Marc A. & Morosuk, Tatiana, 2015. "Comparative exergoeconomic analyses of the integration of biomass gasification and a gas turbine power plant with and without fogging inlet cooling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 394-400.
    2. Athari, Hassan & Soltani, Saeed & Rosen, Marc A. & Gavifekr, Masood Kordoghli & Morosuk, Tatiana, 2016. "Exergoeconomic study of gas turbine steam injection and combined power cycles using fog inlet cooling and biomass fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 715-726.
    3. Athari, Hassan & Soltani, Saeed & Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad & Rosen, Marc A. & Morosuk, Tatiana, 2014. "Exergoeconomic analysis of a biomass post-firing combined-cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 553-561.
    4. Saeed Soltani & Hassan Athari & Marc A. Rosen & Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Tatiana Morosuk, 2015. "Thermodynamic Analyses of Biomass Gasification Integrated Externally Fired, Post-Firing and Dual-Fuel Combined Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Athari, Hassan & Soltani, Saeed & Rosen, Marc A. & Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad & Morosuk, Tatiana, 2016. "Gas turbine steam injection and combined power cycles using fog inlet cooling and biomass fuel: A thermodynamic assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 95-103.
    6. Hassan Athari & Saeed Soltani & Marc A. Rosen & Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Tatiana Morosuk, 2015. "Comparative Exergoeconomic Analyses of Gas Turbine Steam Injection Cycles with and without Fogging Inlet Cooling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Thallam Thattai, A. & Oldenbroek, V. & Schoenmakers, L. & Woudstra, T. & Aravind, P.V., 2016. "Experimental model validation and thermodynamic assessment on high percentage (up to 70%) biomass co-gasification at the 253MWe integrated gasification combined cycle power plant in Buggenum, The Neth," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 381-393.
    8. Datta, Amitava & Ganguly, Ranjan & Sarkar, Luna, 2010. "Energy and exergy analyses of an externally fired gas turbine (EFGT) cycle integrated with biomass gasifier for distributed power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 341-350.
    9. Kyoung Hoon Kim & Kyoungjin Kim, 2012. "Exergy Analysis of Overspray Process in Gas Turbine Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Ibrahim, Thamir K. & Mohammed, Mohammed Kamil & Awad, Omar I. & Abdalla, Ahmed N. & Basrawi, Firdaus & Mohammed, Marwah N. & Najafi, G. & Mamat, Rizalman, 2018. "A comprehensive review on the exergy analysis of combined cycle power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 835-850.
    11. Sahu, Mithilesh Kumar & Sanjay,, 2017. "Comparative exergoeconomics of power utilities: Air-cooled gas turbine cycle and combined cycle configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 42-51.
    12. Matjanov, Erkinjon, 2020. "Gas turbine efficiency enhancement using absorption chiller. Case study for Tashkent CHP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    13. Kwak, H.-Y. & Kim, D.-J. & Jeon, J.-S., 2003. "Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses of power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 343-360.
    14. Zang, Guiyan & Zhang, Jianan & Jia, Junxi & Lora, Electo Silva & Ratner, Albert, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of power-generation systems based on biomass integrated gasification combined cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 336-346.
    15. Sardarabadi, Mohammad & Hosseinzadeh, Mohammad & Kazemian, Arash & Passandideh-Fard, Mohammad, 2017. "Experimental investigation of the effects of using metal-oxides/water nanofluids on a photovoltaic thermal system (PVT) from energy and exergy viewpoints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 682-695.
    16. Nondy, J. & Gogoi, T.K., 2021. "Performance comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for exergetic and exergoenvironomic optimization of a benchmark combined heat and power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    17. Christoph Sejkora & Lisa Kühberger & Fabian Radner & Alexander Trattner & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Exergy as Criteria for Efficient Energy Systems—A Spatially Resolved Comparison of the Current Exergy Consumption, the Current Useful Exergy Demand and Renewable Exergy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-51, February.
    18. Mahdi Deymi-Dashtebayaz & Parisa Kazemiani-Najafabad, 2019. "Energy, Exergy, Economic, and Environmental analysis for various inlet air cooling methods on Shahid Hashemi-Nezhad gas turbines refinery," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(3), pages 481-498, May.
    19. Mohammadkhani, F. & Shokati, N. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Rosen, M.A., 2014. "Exergoeconomic assessment and parametric study of a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor combined with two Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 533-543.
    20. Wijayasekera, Sachindra Chamode & Hewage, Kasun & Hettiaratchi, Patrick & Razi, Faran & Sadiq, Rehan, 2023. "Planning and development of waste-to-hydrogen conversion facilities: A parametric analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:1292-1307:d:45154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.