IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4021-d1645923.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Influencing Factors and Configuration Paths of Employees’ Behavioral Support for Digital Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Li

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Xingyu Jiang

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

Abstract

Digital transformation is a crucial strategic decision for achieving sustainable development. It emphasizes disruptive upgrades in production, operations, and management thinking, thereby infusing vitality into long-term corporate sustainability. While extensive research has explored digital transformation drivers, the role of employees is often overlooked. To address how to activate employees’ behavioral support for digital transformation, this study first identified antecedent conditions of employees’ behavioral support for digital transformation through content analysis within the AMO framework. Subsequently, by combining NCA and fsQCA methods, the study explored the impact of coupling antecedent conditions on behavioral support for digital transformation. The findings are as follows. First, a single factor does not constitute a necessary condition for high behavioral support for digital transformation. Second, there are four configurations that cause high behavioral support for digital transformation: “motivation-driven and leadership-supported”, “experience-led and motivation-driven”, “efficacy-dominated and opportunity-empowered”, and “individually-driven and opportunity-enabled”. Third, learning goal orientation and perceived usefulness are important for activating high behavioral support for digital transformation. This study can provide insights to inspire employees’ support for digital transformation, facilitating corporate digital transformation and further achieving sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Li & Xingyu Jiang, 2025. "Research on the Influencing Factors and Configuration Paths of Employees’ Behavioral Support for Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4021-:d:1645923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4021/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4021/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    2. Lei Guo & Luying Xu, 2021. "The Effects of Digital Transformation on Firm Performance: Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Sabrina Zeike & Katherine Bradbury & Lara Lindert & Holger Pfaff, 2019. "Digital Leadership Skills and Associations with Psychological Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Porfírio, José António & Carrilho, Tiago & Felício, José Augusto & Jardim, Jacinto, 2021. "Leadership characteristics and digital transformation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 610-619.
    5. Zhiying Ji & Tingyu Zhou & Qian Zhang, 2023. "The Impact of Digital Transformation on Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from Listed Companies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yaping Wang & Mengting Zhang, 2024. "How Military Executives Shape Digital Transformation of Firms—The Moderating Role of Symbiosis Orientation and Market Power," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Levent Gun & Salih Zeki Imamoglu & Hulya Turkcan & Huseyin Ince, 2024. "Effect of Digital Transformation on Firm Performance in the Uncertain Environment: Transformational Leadership and Employee Self-Efficacy as Antecedents of Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    3. SiJian Niu & Byung Il Park & Jin Sup Jung, 2022. "The Effects of Digital Leadership and ESG Management on Organizational Innovation and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Jie Liang & Mengfan Wang, 2024. "Executive Social Connection, Regional Digital Economy Development, and Enterprise Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Md. Alamgir Mollah & Mohammad Bin Amin & Gouranga Chandra Debnath & Md. Sajjad Hosain & Md. Atikur Rahaman & Masuk Abdullah, 2024. "Nexus among Digital Leadership, Digital Transformation, and Digital Innovation for Sustainable Financial Performance: Revealing the Influence of Environmental Dynamism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Elia, Gianluca & Solazzo, Gianluca & Lerro, Antonio & Pigni, Federico & Tucci, Christopher L., 2024. "The digital transformation canvas: A conceptual framework for leading the digital transformation process," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 381-398.
    7. Saeideh Sharifi fard & Ezhar Tamam & Md Salleh Hj Hassan & Moniza Waheed & Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh, 2016. "Factors affecting Malaysian university students’ purchase intention in social networking sites," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1182612-118, December.
    8. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Gusti Ayu Novi Yutami, I, 2014. "Smart meter adoption and deployment strategy for residential buildings in Indonesia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 336-349.
    9. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    10. Melih Engin & Fatih Gürses, 2019. "Adoption of Hospital Information Systems in Public Hospitals in Turkey: An Analysis with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Morosan, Cristian, 2016. "An empirical examination of U.S. travelers’ intentions to use biometric e-gates in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-128.
    12. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    13. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Fenies, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    14. Debora Bettiga & Lucio Lamberti & Emanuele Lettieri, 2020. "Individuals’ adoption of smart technologies for preventive health care: a structural equation modeling approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 203-214, June.
    15. Kertcher, Zack & Venkatraman, Rohan & Coslor, Erica, 2020. "Pleasingly parallel: Early cross-disciplinary work for innovation diffusion across boundaries in grid computing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 581-594.
    16. Talukder, Md. Shamim & Sorwar, Golam & Bao, Yukun & Ahmed, Jashim Uddin & Palash, Md. Abu Saeed, 2020. "Predicting antecedents of wearable healthcare technology acceptance by elderly: A combined SEM-Neural Network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. Siti Fatimah Abd. Rahman & Noorlila Ahmad, 2025. "Computer Self-Efficacy and Computer Anxiety: The Effects on Technology Acceptance in Implementing Flipped Learning Approach," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3), pages 4457-4469, March.
    18. Fang Li & Sheng Zhang & Yuhuan Jin, 2018. "Sustainability of University Technology Transfer: Mediating Effect of Inventor’s Technology Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Waqar Younas & K. Ramanathan Kalimuthu, 2021. "Telecom microfinance banking versus commercial banking: a battle in the financial services sector," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 67-80, June.
    20. Sarv Devaraj & Robert F. Easley & J. Michael Crant, 2008. "Research Note ---How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 93-105, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4021-:d:1645923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.