IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3618-d1636448.html

Spatial Evolution and Influencing Factors of Rural Tourism Destinations in an Ecologically Fragile Region of Northwest China—The Case of Lanzhou City

Author

Listed:
  • Hongli Pang

    (Tourism Department, School of Economics & Management, Shanghai Maritime University, 1550 Haigang Avenue, Pudong New Area, Shanghai 201306, China
    Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 320 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Yong Li

    (School of Marxism, Shanghai Maritime University, 1550 Haigang Avenue, Pudong New Area, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Jiawei Zhang

    (Tourism Department, School of Economics & Management, Shanghai Maritime University, 1550 Haigang Avenue, Pudong New Area, Shanghai 201306, China)

Abstract

Rural tourism has become a key driver of rural revitalization in China, contributing to poverty alleviation while also irreversibly altering the spatial evolution of rural settlements. In the ecologically fragile regions of northwest China, the rapid expansion of rural tourism destinations has raised ecological concerns, particularly regarding land resource utilization. Therefore, it is crucial to examine the phenomenon of industrial agglomeration in the evolution of rural tourism within the context of tourism-driven poverty alleviation. This study uses Lanzhou City as a case study and employs nearest neighbor analysis and kernel density estimation to analyze the spatial agglomeration patterns of rural tourism destinations, focusing on agglomeration forms, scales, and patterns. Additionally, it explores the spatial coupling distribution between agglomeration levels and influencing factors. The results show that from 1987 to 2022, the development of rural tourism destinations in Lanzhou City has progressed through several stages, from initial emergence to rapid growth. The form of industrial agglomeration has shifted from a dispersed to a clustered distribution, gradually expanding from urban centers to peripheral areas. The spatial agglomeration follows a multi-core hierarchical point-axial diffusion model, forming multiple core and sub-core agglomeration zones of varying scales. This transformation is primarily driven by geographical factors, transportation accessibility, and the presence of high-quality tourist attractions. However, a comparison of land use changes and ecological vulnerability indices over multiple periods indicates that the industrial agglomeration of rural tourism has led to irregular land use patterns and ecosystem instability. Finally, based on the complex relationship between rural tourism development, industrial agglomeration, and ecological sustainability, this study proposes strategies for the development of rural tourism in Lanzhou City, with the aim of providing valuable insights for the development of rural tourism in ecologically fragile regions of China.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongli Pang & Yong Li & Jiawei Zhang, 2025. "Spatial Evolution and Influencing Factors of Rural Tourism Destinations in an Ecologically Fragile Region of Northwest China—The Case of Lanzhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3618-:d:1636448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3618/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3618/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Gabriela Popescu & Ionut Marius Croitoru & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2024. "Rural Tourism in Mountain Rural Comunities-Possible Direction/Strategies: Case Study Mountain Area from Bihor County," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Caroline Ashley & Dilys Roe, 2002. "Making tourism work for the poor: Strategies and challenges in southern Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 61-82.
    3. Yunxing Zhang & Weizhen Li & Ziyang Li & Meiyu Yang & Feifei Zhai & Zhigang Li & Heng Yao & Haidong Li, 2022. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Key Rural Tourism Villages in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Zeyuan Gong & Wei Liu & Jing Guo & Yi Su & Yapei Gao & Wanru Bu & Jun Ren & Chengying Li, 2024. "How to Achieve the Ecological Sustainability Goal of Ecologically Fragile Areas on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: A Multi-Scenario Simulation of Lanzhou-Xining Urban Agglomerations," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Anestis Fotiadis & Guych Nuryyev & Jennet Achyldurdyyeva & Anastasia Spyridou, 2019. "The Impact of EU Sponsorship, Size, and Geographic Characteristics on Rural Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikolaos Apostolopoulos & Panagiotis Liargovas & Stavros Stavroyiannis & Ilias Makris & Sotiris Apostolopoulos & Dimitrios Petropoulos & Eleni Anastasopoulou, 2020. "Sustaining Rural Areas, Rural Tourism Enterprises and EU Development Policies: A Multi-Layer Conceptualisation of the Obstacles in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Magadán-Díaz, Marta & Sotiriadis, Marios & Rivas-García, Jesús, 2019. "Drivers of eco-innovation in the Spanish hospitality industry," MPRA Paper 94090, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Sebele, Lesego S., 2010. "Community-based tourism ventures, benefits and challenges: Khama Rhino Sanctuary Trust, Central District, Botswana," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 136-146.
    4. Xiaodong Zhang & Haoying Han & Yongjun Tang & Zhilu Chen, 2023. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Tourism Resources in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Alina Emilia Maria Gherdan & Ramona Vasilica Bacter & Ramona Ciolac & Tiberiu Iancu & Cristina Maria Maerescu & Monica Angelica Dodu & Aurelia Ioana Chereji & Vasile Grigore Herman & Alexandra Ungurea, 2025. "Sustainable Agritourism Development in Romania’s North-West Mountain Region: A TOPSIS-Based Evaluation of Strategic Priorities," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    6. Shiying Li & Yuhong Song & Hua Xu & Yijiao Li & Shaokun Zhou, 2023. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Driving Factors for Traditional Villages in Areas of China Based on GWR Modeling and Geodetector: A Case Study of the Awa Mountain Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Jin Yang & Chen Xu & Zhiyong Fang & Yuanbo Shi, 2022. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Rural Revitalization Model Villages in the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Renuka Mahadevan & Hidayat Amir & Anda Nugroho, 2017. "Regional impacts of tourism-led growth on poverty and income inequality," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(3), pages 614-631, May.
    9. Xinyu Xie & Ying Zhang & Xiaoping Qiu, 2023. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Rural Governance Demonstration Villages in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Miroslav Horák & Samuel Antwi Darkwah & Nahanga Verter, 2014. "Tourism as a Poverty Reduction Tool: The Case of Mukuni Village in the Southern Province of Zambia," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 62(6), pages 1287-1292.
    11. Xiaogang Feng & Moqing Hu & Sekhar Somenahalli & Xinyuan Bian & Meng Li & Zaihui Zhou & Fengxia Li & Yuan Wang, 2023. "A Study of Spatio-Temporal Differentiation Characteristics and Driving Factors of Shaanxi Province’s Traditional Heritage Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Lei Zhu & Jing Hu & Jiahui Xu & Yannan Li & Mangmang Liang, 2022. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Pro-Poor Tourism Villages in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Iza Lejárraga & Peter Walkenhorst, 2013. "Economic policy, tourism trade and productive diversification," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 135-136, pages 1-12.
    14. Runchun Guo & Yanmei Xu, 2025. "Spatial Differentiation and Driving Mechanisms of Revolutionary Cultural Tourism Resources in Xinjiang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Haretsebe Manwa & Farai Manwa, 2014. "Poverty Alleviation through Pro-Poor Tourism: The Role of Botswana Forest Reserves," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Bingqian Li & Jun Wang & Yibing Jin, 2022. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Traditional Villages and Influence Factors Thereof in Hilly and Gully Areas of Northern Shaanxi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-29, November.
    17. Yu Yan & Zhe Bai & Xian Hu & Yansong Wang, 2025. "How Do Natural Environmental Factors Influence the Spatial Patterns and Site Selection of Famous Mountain Temple Complexes in China? Quantitative Research on Wudang Mountain in the Ming Dynasty," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, July.
    18. Simin Yan & Chen Chen, 2025. "Rural transformation and sustainable livelihood approaches under regional environmental policies: Evidence from two villages in the Yangtze River Delta metropolitan region, China," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 2096-2117, April.
    19. Yuqing Geng & Siqiao Zhao & Xiaohan Zhang & Jianyi Li & Yan Yan & Juan Gao, 2025. "Bibliometric analysis of sustainable rural tourism," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-28, December.
    20. Birame Sarr & Matías Manuel González-Hernández & Jose Boza-Chirino & Javier de León, 2020. "Understanding Communities’ Disaffection to Participate in Tourism in Protected Areas: A Social Representational Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3618-:d:1636448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.