Author
Listed:
- Masoud Salehe Sultan
(African Centre for Crop Improvement (ACCI), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa
TARI Kihinga Center, Tanzania Agricultural Research Institute (TARI), Kigoma P.O. Box 132, Tanzania)
- Hussein Shimelis
(African Centre for Crop Improvement (ACCI), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa)
- Filson Mbezi Kagimbo
(TARI Kihinga Center, Tanzania Agricultural Research Institute (TARI), Kigoma P.O. Box 132, Tanzania)
- Emmanuel Justin Mrema
(TARI Tumbi Center, Tanzania Agricultural Research Institute (TARI), Tabora P.O. Box 306, Tanzania)
Abstract
Oil palm is one of the primary vegetable oil sources worldwide, including in Tanzania. Tanzania’s mean palm oil yield is 1.6 tons per hectare, far below the 6 to 8 tons per hectare reported elsewhere. This low oil yield is attributable to underdeveloped, unsustainable oil palm production systems and improvements, several biotic and abiotic stresses, and socio-economic and policy challenges that have yet to be systematically documented to guide large-scale production, breeding, and research support. The objectives of this study were to appraise oil palm production and improvement in Tanzania, focusing on constraints, opportunities, and farmers’ major preferences. A participatory rural appraisal study was conducted in Kigoma Region, in three selected districts. Data were collected from 392 oil palm farmers using semi-structured questionnaires and 54 focus group discussants. Data were subjected to statistical analyses to discern the variables and their significant associations using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS Inc., 2020). About 98.5% of the participant farmers engage in oil palm production. Most respondent farmers predominantly cultivate the Dura oil palm type (97.4%), followed by Tenera (50%). The farmers’ major reported oil palm production constraints were an inadequate supply of improved planting materials (reported by 82.7% of respondents), poor access to credit (72.4%), a high cost of production inputs (59.4%), poor market access (56.4%), insect pests and diseases (53.6), and poor production technologies (45.4%). A chi-square analysis of farmers’ production constraints revealed that the unavailability of labor ( X 2 = 41.181; p = 0.000); limited extension services ( X 2 = 29.074; p = 0.000); and diseases and pests ( X 2 = 19.582; p = 0.000) differed significantly across the study area. Additionally, the lack of fertilizers ( X 2 = 14.218; p = 0.001); inappropriate technology and knowledge gaps ( X 2 = 10.529; p = 0.005); and poor market access ( X 2 = 6.621; p = 0.036) differed significantly across districts. A high oil yield (reported by 58.7% of the respondents), a high number of bunches per plant (40.5%), early maturity (37.2%), and tolerance to droughts (23%) and diseases and insect pests (18.9%) were the most preferred traits by farmers in oil palm varieties. Therefore, integrative and sustainable breeding oil palm for enhanced yields and farmers’ preferred traits will increase the adoption of newly improved varieties for local palm oil production, import substitution, and economic development in Tanzania.
Suggested Citation
Masoud Salehe Sultan & Hussein Shimelis & Filson Mbezi Kagimbo & Emmanuel Justin Mrema, 2025.
"An Appraisal of the Constraints, Opportunities, and Farmers’ Needs and Preferences of Oil Palm for Sustainable Production and Improvement in Tanzania,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3546-:d:1635178
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3546-:d:1635178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.