IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3489-d1634180.html

Travel Characteristics and Cost–Benefit Analysis of Bikeshare Service on University Campuses

Author

Listed:
  • Xianyuan Zhu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Duanya Lyu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Jianmin Xu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Yongjie Lin

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

Abstract

Bikeshare has emerged as a sustainable mobility solution not only for addressing the first- and last-kilometer problem but facilitating short- and medium-distance travel. While existing research predominantly focuses on city-level Bikeshare Programs (BSPs), there is a paucity of studies examining university campus BSPs, particularly in terms of quantitative analysis of trip frequency and system operation sustainability. This paper presents a systematical framework to investigate university campus BSPs from two complementary perspectives: users’ travel characteristics and operational sustainability. To achieve this, two successive self-reported questionnaire surveys were conducted on the campus of South China University of Technology in 2017 and 2020, respectively. Subsequently, a multinomial logistic regression model was developed to identify the key factors influencing users’ travel frequency. Finally, a cost–benefit analysis was developed to assess the operational sustainability of the system. The findings reveal two significant insights: (1) the system was profitable under the 2017 fare policy, with the potential to maximize profits by strategically increasing fares while enhancing service quality; and (2) in 2020, when the fare is adjusted closer to the predicted optimal value, there is an increase in the proportion of high-frequency users, accompanied by improved user experience, reduced difficulty in bike access/return, and slightly lower pricing satisfaction. This study provides a valuable method that can be extended to the restricted service communities for effective planning and evaluation of bikeshare systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianyuan Zhu & Duanya Lyu & Jianmin Xu & Yongjie Lin, 2025. "Travel Characteristics and Cost–Benefit Analysis of Bikeshare Service on University Campuses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3489-:d:1634180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3489/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3489/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elliot Fishman, 2016. "Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 92-113, January.
    2. Elżbieta Macioszek & Agata Kurek, 2021. "The Analysis of the Factors Determining the Choice of Park and Ride Facility Using a Multinomial Logit Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-33, January.
    3. Zhan, Zilin & Guo, Yuanyuan & Noland, Robert B. & He, Sylvia Y. & Wang, Yacan, 2023. "Analysis of links between dockless bikeshare and metro trips in Beijing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohseni, Ghazaleh & Nourinejad, Mehdi & Park, Peter Y., 2026. "Bike-sharing ridership prediction for network expansion using graph neural networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    2. Liu, Xize & Chen, Jingxu & Chen, Xuewu & Ning, Jiang, 2025. "Shared micro-mobility meets bus: A spatiotemporal heterogeneity analysis in Chinese medium-sized cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Zheng Wen & Dongwei Tian & Naiming Wu, 2024. "Modeling and Analyzing the Spatiotemporal Travel Patterns of Bike Sharing: A Case Study of Citi Bike in New York," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Radzimski, Adam & Dzięcielski, Michał, 2021. "Exploring the relationship between bike-sharing and public transport in Poznań, Poland," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 189-202.
    5. Mariusz Korzeń & Maciej Kruszyna, 2023. "Modified Ant Colony Optimization as a Means for Evaluating the Variants of the City Railway Underground Section," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Jiang, Zhoutong & Lei, Chao & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2020. "Optimal investment and management of shared bikes in a competitive market," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 143-155.
    7. Ding, Hongliang & Lu, Yuhuan & Sze, N.N. & Li, Haojie, 2022. "Effect of dockless bike-sharing scheme on the demand for London Cycle Hire at the disaggregate level using a deep learning approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 150-163.
    8. Yiling Deng & Pengjun Zhao, 2023. "The determinants of shared bike use in China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Xue Luo & Li Li & Lei Zhao & Jianfeng Lin, 2022. "Dynamic Intra-Cell Repositioning in Free-Floating Bike-Sharing Systems Using Approximate Dynamic Programming," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 799-826, July.
    10. Ali Al-Ramini & Mohammad A Takallou & Daniel P Piatkowski & Fadi Alsaleem, 2022. "Quantifying changes in bicycle volumes using crowdsourced data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1612-1630, July.
    11. Zhi Pei & Xu Dai & Tianzong Yu & Lu Zhao & Qiao-Chu He, 2022. "Dynamic Rebalancing Strategy in Free-Float Bicycle Sharing Systems: Orbit Queues and Two-Sided Matching," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 35-59, March.
    12. Nixon, Denver V. & Schwanen, Tim, 2019. "Bike sharing beyond the norm," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Chiou, Yu-Chiun & Wu, Kuo-Chi, 2024. "Bikesharing: The first- and last-mile service of public transportation? Evidence from an origin–destination perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Van Veghel, Daniel & Scott, Darren M., 2024. "Investigating the impacts of bike lanes on bike share ridership: A holistic approach and demonstration," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    15. Ma, Xinwei & Ji, Yanjie & Yuan, Yufei & Van Oort, Niels & Jin, Yuchuan & Hoogendoorn, Serge, 2020. "A comparison in travel patterns and determinants of user demand between docked and dockless bike-sharing systems using multi-sourced data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 148-173.
    16. Chen, Wendong & Gu, Yu & Chen, Xuewu & Cheng, Long & De Vos, Jonas, 2025. "Optimal location of free-floating bike-sharing dispatching hubs: A multi-scale perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    17. Jian-gang Shi & Hongyun Si & Guangdong Wu & Yangyue Su & Jing Lan, 2018. "Critical Factors to Achieve Dockless Bike-Sharing Sustainability in China: A Stakeholder-Oriented Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Mooney, Stephen J. & Hosford, Kate & Howe, Bill & Yan, An & Winters, Meghan & Bassok, Alon & Hirsch, Jana A., 2019. "Freedom from the station: Spatial equity in access to dockless bike share," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 91-96.
    19. Cheng, Long & Huang, Jie & Jin, Tanhua & Chen, Wendong & Li, Aoyong & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "Comparison of station-based and free-floating bikeshare systems as feeder modes to the metro," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    20. Margarita Bagamanova & Miguel Mujica Mota & Vittorio Di Vito, 2022. "Exploring the Efficiency of Future Multimodal Networks: A Door-to-Door Case in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3489-:d:1634180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.