IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orserv/v14y2022i1p35-59.html

Dynamic Rebalancing Strategy in Free-Float Bicycle Sharing Systems: Orbit Queues and Two-Sided Matching

Author

Listed:
  • Zhi Pei

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Xu Dai

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Tianzong Yu

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Lu Zhao

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695)

  • Qiao-Chu He

    (Southern University of Science and Technology, School of Business, Shenzhen 518055, China)

Abstract

In populous metropolitan areas, the free-floating bicycle-sharing system (FFBSS) acts as an innovative urban mobility as a service, which provides an ease-of-use feature and extra flexibility in contrast to the traditional shared bicycles with docks. In consideration of customer behaviors, such as abandonment and retrial, which occur in FFBSS, a redistribution strategy for shared bicycles among different user-density locations is presented with an aim to diminish the total operational cost while enhancing the overall service level. To formulate the user and multitype shared bicycle–arrival patterns as nonhomogeneous queues, our results provide a tractable analytical paradigm for a time-varying balancing strategy for FFBSS. The bicycle variation at each virtual zone after each redistribution is determined via a nonstationary queueing model, in which the service time, patience time, and research delay are all subject to general distribution. Then, the bicycle-deployment strategy is evaluated with respect to average queueing length and abandonment rate during a normal workday based on a tailored nonhomogeneous probabilistic matching queue. To verify the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the proposed bicycle-redistribution strategy, multiple simulation runs are conducted with respect to various times of the day. It shows that the resulting optimal rebalancing strategy is batch-based in synchrony with the time heterogeneity in the traffic demand. Furthermore, several managerial insights are provided to shed light on the rule of thumb in practical FFBSS redistribution coordination.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhi Pei & Xu Dai & Tianzong Yu & Lu Zhao & Qiao-Chu He, 2022. "Dynamic Rebalancing Strategy in Free-Float Bicycle Sharing Systems: Orbit Queues and Two-Sided Matching," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 35-59, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:35-59
    DOI: 10.1287/serv.2021.0287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/serv.2021.0287
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/serv.2021.0287?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schuijbroek, J. & Hampshire, R.C. & van Hoeve, W.-J., 2017. "Inventory rebalancing and vehicle routing in bike sharing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 992-1004.
    2. Tal Raviv & Ofer Kolka, 2013. "Optimal inventory management of a bike-sharing station," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(10), pages 1077-1093.
    3. Jia Shu & Mabel C. Chou & Qizhang Liu & Chung-Piaw Teo & I-Lin Wang, 2013. "Models for Effective Deployment and Redistribution of Bicycles Within Public Bicycle-Sharing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(6), pages 1346-1359, December.
    4. Liu, Yunan & Whitt, Ward, 2017. "Stabilizing performance in a service system with time-varying arrivals and customer feedback," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(2), pages 473-486.
    5. Zhang, Dong & Yu, Chuhang & Desai, Jitamitra & Lau, H.Y.K. & Srivathsan, Sandeep, 2017. "A time-space network flow approach to dynamic repositioning in bicycle sharing systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 188-207.
    6. Zhang, Yongping & Mi, Zhifu, 2018. "Environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big data-based analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 296-301.
    7. Alvarez-Valdes, Ramon & Belenguer, Jose M. & Benavent, Enrique & Bermudez, Jose D. & Muñoz, Facundo & Vercher, Enriqueta & Verdejo, Francisco, 2016. "Optimizing the level of service quality of a bike-sharing system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 163-175.
    8. Sharon Datner & Tal Raviv & Michal Tzur & Daniel Chemla, 2019. "Setting Inventory Levels in a Bike Sharing Network," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 62-76, February.
    9. Antonio Di Crescenzo & Virginia Giorno & Balasubramanian Krishna Kumar & Amelia G. Nobile, 2018. "A Time-Non-Homogeneous Double-Ended Queue with Failures and Repairs and Its Continuous Approximation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Xu, Zhengtian & Yin, Yafeng & Ye, Jieping, 2020. "On the supply curve of ride-hailing systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 29-43.
    11. Ward Whitt, 2005. "Engineering Solution of a Basic Call-Center Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 221-235, February.
    12. Wang, Mingshu & Zhou, Xiaolu, 2017. "Bike-sharing systems and congestion: Evidence from US cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 147-154.
    13. Amirmahdi Tafreshian & Neda Masoud & Yafeng Yin, 2020. "Frontiers in Service Science: Ride Matching for Peer-to-Peer Ride Sharing: A Review and Future Directions," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2-3), pages 44-60, June.
    14. Mor Kaspi & Tal Raviv & Michal Tzur, 2017. "Bike-sharing systems: User dissatisfaction in the presence of unusable bicycles," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 144-158, February.
    15. Elliot Fishman, 2016. "Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 92-113, January.
    16. Ward Whitt, 1991. "The Pointwise Stationary Approximation for Mt/Mt/s Queues Is Asymptotically Correct As the Rates Increase," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 307-314, March.
    17. Yunan Liu & Ward Whitt, 2012. "Stabilizing Customer Abandonment in Many-Server Queues with Time-Varying Arrivals," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1551-1564, December.
    18. Haider, Zulqarnain & Nikolaev, Alexander & Kang, Jee Eun & Kwon, Changhyun, 2018. "Inventory rebalancing through pricing in public bike sharing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 103-117.
    19. Ashish Kabra & Elena Belavina & Karan Girotra, 2020. "Bike-Share Systems: Accessibility and Availability," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(9), pages 3803-3824, September.
    20. Daniel Freund & Shane G. Henderson & Eoin O’Mahony & David B. Shmoys, 2019. "Analytics and Bikes: Riding Tandem with Motivate to Improve Mobility," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(5), pages 310-323, September.
    21. Rahul Nair & Elise Miller-Hooks, 2011. "Fleet Management for Vehicle Sharing Operations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 524-540, November.
    22. Saif Benjaafar & Ming Hu, 2020. "Operations Management in the Age of the Sharing Economy: What Is Old and What Is New?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 93-101, January.
    23. Qingying Li & Pengfei Guo & Chung-Lun Li & Jing-Sheng Song, 2016. "Equilibrium Joining Strategies and Optimal Control of a Make-to-Stock Queue," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(9), pages 1513-1527, September.
    24. Ward Whitt, 2006. "Fluid Models for Multiserver Queues with Abandonments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 37-54, February.
    25. Burak Büke & Hanyi Chen, 2017. "Fluid and diffusion approximations of probabilistic matching systems," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 1-33, June.
    26. Ying Shi & Zhaotong Lian, 2016. "Equilibrium Strategies and Optimal Control for a Double-Ended Queue," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(03), pages 1-18, June.
    27. Dell'Amico, Mauro & Hadjicostantinou, Eleni & Iori, Manuel & Novellani, Stefano, 2014. "The bike sharing rebalancing problem: Mathematical formulations and benchmark instances," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 7-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rui-Na Fan & Quan-Lin Li & Xiaole Wu & Zhe George Zhang, 2025. "Dockless bike-sharing systems with unusable bikes: removing, repair and redistribution under batch policies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(1), pages 181-219, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junming Liu & Weiwei Chen & Leilei Sun, 2025. "A Data-Driven Optimization Framework for Static Rebalancing Operations in Bike Sharing Systems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 1369-1390, September.
    2. Xue Luo & Li Li & Lei Zhao & Jianfeng Lin, 2022. "Dynamic Intra-Cell Repositioning in Free-Floating Bike-Sharing Systems Using Approximate Dynamic Programming," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 799-826, July.
    3. Qiao‐Chu He & Tiantian Nie & Yun Yang & Zuo‐Jun Shen, 2021. "Beyond Repositioning: Crowd‐Sourcing and Geo‐Fencing for Shared‐Mobility Systems," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3448-3466, October.
    4. Silva, Maria Clara Martins & Aloise, Daniel & Jena, Sanjay Dominik, 2024. "Data-driven prioritization strategies for inventory rebalancing in bike-sharing systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    5. Daniel Freund & Shane G. Henderson & David B. Shmoys, 2022. "Minimizing Multimodular Functions and Allocating Capacity in Bike-Sharing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(5), pages 2715-2731, September.
    6. Saif Benjaafar & Daniel Jiang & Xiang Li & Xiaobo Li, 2022. "Dynamic Inventory Repositioning in On-Demand Rental Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7861-7878, November.
    7. Bruno A. Neumann-Saavedra & Rossana Cavagnini, 2025. "Column-generation-based heuristics for integrating static rebalancing and faulty bike collection in bike-sharing systems," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 47(2), pages 375-409, June.
    8. Bruno Albert Neumann-Saavedra & Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Bernard Gendron & Dirk Christian Mattfeld & Michael Römer, 2020. "Integrating Resource Management in Service Network Design for Bike-Sharing Systems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(5), pages 1251-1271, September.
    9. Chen, Qingxin & Ma, Shoufeng & Li, Hongming & Zhu, Ning & He, Qiao-Chu, 2024. "Optimizing bike rebalancing strategies in free-floating bike-sharing systems: An enhanced distributionally robust approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    10. Gu, Wei & Yu, Xiaoru & Zhang, Shichen & Yan, Xiangbin & Wang, Chen, 2023. "To outsource or not: Bike-share rebalancing strategies under the service quality deviation of a third party," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 847-859.
    11. Huang, Di & Chen, Xinyuan & Liu, Zhiyuan & Lyu, Cheng & Wang, Shuaian & Chen, Xuewu, 2020. "A static bike repositioning model in a hub-and-spoke network framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    12. Wang, Yi-Jia & Kuo, Yong-Hong & Huang, George Q. & Gu, Weihua & Hu, Yaohua, 2022. "Dynamic demand-driven bike station clustering," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. Lv, Chang & Zhang, Chaoyong & Lian, Kunlei & Ren, Yaping & Meng, Leilei, 2020. "A hybrid algorithm for the static bike-sharing re-positioning problem based on an effective clustering strategy," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-21.
    14. Çelebi, Dilay & Yörüsün, Aslı & Işık, Hanife, 2018. "Bicycle sharing system design with capacity allocations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 86-98.
    15. Gilbert Laporte & Frédéric Meunier & Roberto Wolfler Calvo, 2018. "Shared mobility systems: an updated survey," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(1), pages 105-126, December.
    16. Fu, Chenyi & Zhu, Ning & Pinedo, Michael & Ma, Shoufeng, 2025. "Station-based, free-float, or hybrid: An operating mode analysis of a bike-sharing system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Negahban, Ashkan, 2019. "Simulation-based estimation of the real demand in bike-sharing systems in the presence of censoring," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 317-332.
    18. Carlos M. Vallez & Mario Castro & David Contreras, 2021. "Challenges and Opportunities in Dock-Based Bike-Sharing Rebalancing: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    19. Osorio, Jesus & Lei, Chao & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2021. "Optimal rebalancing and on-board charging of shared electric scooters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 197-219.
    20. Liang Gao & Wei Xu & Yifeng Duan, 2019. "Dynamic Scheduling Based on Predicted Inventory Variation Rate for Public Bicycle System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-11, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:35-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.