IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3389-d1632297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining Essential Indicators for Feasibility Assessment of Using Initiative Green Building Methods in Revitalization of Worn-Out Urban Fabrics

Author

Listed:
  • Negar Ramezani

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan 81595-39998, Iran)

  • Jolanta Tamošaitienė

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio Al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Hadi Sarvari

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan 81595-39998, Iran
    The Infrastructure Futures Research Group, College of the Built Environment, City Centre Campus, Millennium Point, Birmingham City University, Birmingham B4 7XG, UK)

  • Mahboobeh Golestanizadeh

    (Department of Management, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan 81595-39998, Iran)

Abstract

Purpose—The reconstruction of worn-out urban fabrics poses a significant challenge in sustainable urban development, as such places, due to their decay and infrastructural inefficiencies, diminish residents’ quality of life and generate many environmental, social, and economic issues. Meanwhile, green building techniques have emerged as a novel option because they focus on environmental sustainability and resource efficiency. Nonetheless, effectively executing these strategies in worn-out urban fabrics necessitates a thorough feasibility evaluation to identify the associated obstacles and implementation prerequisites. The current study aimed to identify critical indicators for the feasibility of employing contemporary green building techniques in the repair of worn-out urban fabrics in Iran. The revitalization of worn-out urban fabrics is essential to enhancing the quality of life of urban inhabitants. Regarding this matter, the concept of green buildings, which emphasizes environmental sustainability, deserves significant attention. Meanwhile, feasibility assessments can help to successfully implement these changes in worn-out urban fabrics. Accordingly, the current study seeks to determine the essential indicators for the feasibility assessment of using initiative green building methods in the revitalization of worn-out urban fabric. Design/methodology/approach—In this vein, two rounds of the Delphi survey technique were carried out to identify and consolidate the indicators for the feasibility assessment of using initiative green building methods in the revitalization of the worn-out urban fabric in Iran. A research questionnaire was developed after reviewing the literature. It consists of four main dimensions (i.e., environmental, cultural–social, management–legal, and technical–technological) containing a total of 26 distinct indicators. The questionnaire was distributed among 123 experienced specialists. Eventually, the collected data were analyzed using the SPSS and Smart PLS programs. Findings—The results revealed that identified dimensions and indicators can be considered significant and essential indices in evaluating the use of initiative green building methods in the revitalization of worn-out urban fabric. Furthermore, the sequence of importance of the dimensions was environmental, followed by technical and technological, cultural and social, and managerial and legal. The environment, with an average rating of 3.33, ranked first; technical–technology, with an average rating of 2.45, ranked second; cultural–social, with an average rating of 2.15, ranked third; and management–legal, with an average rating of 2.07, ranked fourth. Furthermore, among the ranked indicators, the utilization of natural plants as a source of inspiration for living design in communal areas, aimed at toxin absorption and gas mitigation while achieving thermal equilibrium, received the highest average rating of 18.22, securing the first position. Conversely, the indicator assessing residents’ financial capacity, and the establishment of executive assurances and governmental support for the revitalization of the neighborhoods’ fabric garnered the lowest average rating of 10.98, placing it 26th and final. Originality/value—This research’s findings can significantly influence public policy and urban planning initiatives, aiding in the sustainable repair of worn-out urban fabrics in Iran by offering a systematic framework for evaluating the viability of innovative green building techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Negar Ramezani & Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Hadi Sarvari & Mahboobeh Golestanizadeh, 2025. "Determining Essential Indicators for Feasibility Assessment of Using Initiative Green Building Methods in Revitalization of Worn-Out Urban Fabrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3389-:d:1632297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3389/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3389/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xia, Chunhai & Zhu, Yingxin & Lin, Borong, 2008. "Renewable energy utilization evaluation method in green buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 883-886.
    2. Tianqi Liu & Lin Chen & Mingyu Yang & Malindu Sandanayake & Pengyun Miao & Yang Shi & Pow-Seng Yap, 2022. "Sustainability Considerations of Green Buildings: A Detailed Overview on Current Advancements and Future Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Hadi Sarvari & Mansooreh Rakhshanifar & Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Daniel W.M. Chan & Michael Beer, 2019. "A Risk Based Approach to Evaluating the Impacts of Zayanderood Drought on Sustainable Development Indicators of Riverside Urban in Isfahan-Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Barbara E. Meyer & Elena Gaertner & Christian Elting, 2024. "Closing the Gap: The Tripartite Structure of Sustainability as a Tool for Sustainable Education—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Ruveyda Komurlu & Dilara Kalkan Ceceloglu & David Arditi, 2024. "Exploring the Barriers to Managing Green Building Construction Projects and Proposed Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Guiwen Liu & Zhiyong Yi & Xiaoling Zhang & Asheem Shrestha & Igor Martek & Lizhen Wei, 2017. "An Evaluation of Urban Renewal Policies of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan, Wenjian & Du, Juan, 2021. "Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Seyi Stephen & Clinton Aigbavboa, 2025. "Enhancing Academia–Industry Partnerships for Sustainable Building: A Change Framework for Research and Innovation Integration in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-35, April.
    3. Zheng, Guozhong & Jing, Youyin & Huang, Hongxia & Shi, Guohua & Zhang, Xutao, 2010. "Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchical process model for building energy conservation assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 78-87.
    4. Sahba Tavakoli & Ege Uluca Tumer, 2024. "Authenticity- and Sustainability-Based Failure Prevention in the Post-Conservation Life of Reused Historic Houses as Tourist Accommodations: Award-Winning Projects from Isfahan City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-31, August.
    5. Bing Xia & Jindong Wu & Jiaqi Wang & Yitao Fang & Haodi Shen & Jingli Shen, 2021. "Sustainable Renewal Methods of Urban Public Parking Spaces under the Scenario of Shared Autonomous Vehicles (SAV): A Review and a Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Vahidreza Yousefi & Hamed Tabasi, 2021. "Project Portfolio Construction Using Extreme Value Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, January.
    7. Zhiyong Yi & Guiwen Liu & Wei Lang & Asheem Shrestha & Igor Martek, 2017. "Strategic Approaches to Sustainable Urban Renewal in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Lotfabadi, Pooya, 2015. "Analyzing passive solar strategies in the case of high-rise building," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1340-1353.
    9. Chen Liu & Jia Liu, 2023. "Resilience of Living Streets in Small and Medium-Sized Towns: A Grounded Theory Study of Yixing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Xiaoxu Dang & Liyuan Liu & Xiaopeng Deng & Na Zhang & Mengyuan Cheng, 2025. "The Risk Mitigation Effect of Social Responsibility: Evidence from International Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Kelly Parsons & David Barling, 2022. "Identifying the Policy Instrument Interactions to Enable the Public Procurement of Sustainable Food," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Guiwen Liu & Cheng Li & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuhan Zheng & Hongjuan Wu & Jian Tang, 2022. "Determining the Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Urban Regeneration Projects in China on the City Scale: The Case of Shenzhen," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.
    13. Fangyun Xie & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    14. Moudi Mahdi, 2024. "Enhancing Disparity in Water Distribution within Irrigation Systems Aimed at Improving the Conflict Domain under Alternative Perspectives: A Reliable Multi-Objective Framework," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Yang Bai & Wei Zhou & Yanjun Guan & Xue Li & Baohua Huang & Fengchun Lei & Hong Yang & Wenmin Huo, 2020. "Evolution of Policy Concerning the Readjustment of Inefficient Urban Land Use in China Based on a Content Analysis Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Prin Boonkanit & Kridchai Suthiluck, 2023. "Developing a Decision-Making Support System for a Smart Construction and Demolition Waste Transition to a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
    17. Emmanuel Mavhura & Komal Raj Aryal, 2025. "Assessing progress in reducing the number of disaster-affected people: insights from Zimbabwe," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(5), pages 5129-5147, March.
    18. Yuan, Xueliang & Wang, Xujiang & Zuo, Jian, 2013. "Renewable energy in buildings in China—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-8.
    19. Calautit, John Kaiser & O'Connor, Dominic & Hughes, Ben Richard, 2016. "A natural ventilation wind tower with heat pipe heat recovery for cold climates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P3), pages 1088-1104.
    20. Jing Zhang & Zuopeng Ma & Dawei Li & Wei Liu & Yao Tong & Chenggu Li, 2020. "Young Pioneers, Vitality, and Commercial Gentrification in Mudan Street, Changchun, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3389-:d:1632297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.