IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6986-d1714991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Method in Certification of Buildings: BCA Method and a Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Cevdet Emin Ekinci

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Firat University, Elazig 23000, Turkey)

  • Belkis Elyigit

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Firat University, Elazig 23000, Turkey)

Abstract

This study investigates the engineering characteristics of a newly commissioned higher education building through the Bioharmological Conformity Assessment (BCA) method, specifically using the 2020vEB version. The BCA is a novel evaluation approach that assesses whether a building aligns with the identity of its users and its intended function. The engineering attributes of the structure were assessed across 12 core criteria, encompassing a total of 600 individual parameters. Findings from the BCA inspection indicate that the newly completed building falls into the category of “Near-Standard Building/Minor Modifications Required.” The BCA score was calculated as 398.73, corresponding to a deficiency rate of 25.50%. Notably, significant shortcomings were observed in categories such as user identity and intended use, Physical Characteristics of the Space, and Ecological and Seismological Suitability. Consequently, targeted improvements are necessary to align the building with bioharmological principles, requiring only minor adjustments to rectify the identified deficiencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Cevdet Emin Ekinci & Belkis Elyigit, 2025. "A New Method in Certification of Buildings: BCA Method and a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6986-:d:1714991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6986/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6986/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6986-:d:1714991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.