IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p2818-d1617941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing Efficiency and Sustainability: Multicriteria Decision-Making for Pumping Station Upgrades

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Koprivica

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Andrea Ivanišević

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Darko Stefanović

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Milan Jovin

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Maja Petrović

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

Abstract

This study examines the financial and operational sustainability of modernizing drainage pump station systems in Vojvodina, aiming to improve energy efficiency and adapt to climate change. Various technical and economic modernization scenarios were analyzed to identify the optimal variant (V3.1), which balances investment costs, operational efficiency, and long-term environmental benefits. The analytical approaches used include multicriteria analysis, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model, the TOPSIS technique, and fuzzy logic, providing comprehensive insights into the ranking of the four proposed variants. The results indicate that Variant V3.1, which features local SCADA systems and centralized management, offers an optimal solution for modernization. This model enhances operational reliability, reduces energy costs, and contributes to the sustainable development of the region through more efficient resource utilization. The proposed approach not only meets the specific needs of Vojvodina but also provides a broader framework for assessing similar infrastructure projects in other regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Koprivica & Andrea Ivanišević & Darko Stefanović & Milan Jovin & Maja Petrović, 2025. "Balancing Efficiency and Sustainability: Multicriteria Decision-Making for Pumping Station Upgrades," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2818-:d:1617941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2818/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2818/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ionel Aurel Drăghici & Ionuţ-Daniel Rus & Adrian Cococeanu & Sebastian Muntean, 2022. "Improved Operation Strategy of the Pumping System Implemented in Timisoara Municipal Water Treatment Station," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Yiannis Xenidis & Demos Angelides, 2005. "The financial risks in build-operate-transfer projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 431-441.
    3. Kajetan d’Obyrn & Paweł Kamiński & Damian Cień & Sebastian Jendrysik & Dariusz Prostański, 2024. "Hydrogeological and Mining Considerations in the Design of a Pumping Station in a Shaft of a Closed Black Coal Mine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Martyna Świętochowska & Izabela Bartkowska, 2022. "Optimization of Energy Consumption in the Pumping Station Supplying Two Zones of the Water Supply System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Marjolijn Haasnoot & Hans Middelkoop & Astrid Offermans & Eelco Beek & Willem Deursen, 2012. "Exploring pathways for sustainable water management in river deltas in a changing environment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 795-819, December.
    6. Andrzej Chmiela & Paweł Wrona & Małgorzata Magdziarczyk & Ronghou Liu & Le Zhang & Adam Smolinski, 2024. "Hydrogen Storage and Combustion for Blackout Protection of Mine Water Pumping Stations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Yeu-Shiang Huang & Wei-Hao Li, 2012. "A Study on Aggregation of TOPSIS Ideal Solutions for Group Decision-Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 461-473, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ling Jia & Queena K. Qian & Frits Meijer & Henk Visscher, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Risk Perception: A Perspective for Proactive Risk Management in Residential Building Energy Retrofits in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Sandrine Mathy & Patrick Criqui & Katharina Knoop & Manfred Fischedick & Sascha Samadi, 2016. "Uncertainty management and the dynamic adjustment of deep decarbonization pathways," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(sup1), pages 47-62, June.
    3. Vizinho, André & Avelar, David & Fonseca, Ana Lúcia & Carvalho, Silvia & Sucena-Paiva, Leonor & Pinho, Pedro & Nunes, Alice & Branquinho, Cristina & Vasconcelos, Ana Cátia & Santos, Filipe Duarte & Ro, 2021. "Framing the application of Adaptation Pathways for agroforestry in Mediterranean drylands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    4. K. M. Bruijn & N. Lips & B. Gersonius & H. Middelkoop, 2016. "The storyline approach: a new way to analyse and improve flood event management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 99-121, March.
    5. Caixiang Chen & Shiliang Mo & Jinling Zhao, 2023. "A group decision making method with preference analysis to re-build the Global Entrepreneurship Index," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Yi Lixin & Cheng Ke & Cao Xiaoying & Sun Yueling & Cheng Xiaoqing & He Ye, 2017. "Analysis of social vulnerability of residential community to hazards in Tianjin, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(2), pages 1223-1243, June.
    7. Sureeyatanapas, Panitas & Sriwattananusart, Kawinpob & Niyamosoth, Thanawath & Sessomboon, Weerapat & Arunyanart, Sirawadee, 2018. "Supplier selection towards uncertain and unavailable information: An extension of TOPSIS method," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 69-79.
    8. Fu, Yelin & Lai, Kin Keung & Yu, Lean, 2021. "Multi-nation comparisons of energy architecture performance: A group decision-making method with preference structure and acceptability analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Brás, Marlene & Moura, Ana & Andrade-Campos, António, 2025. "Cost efficiency in water supply systems: An applied review on optimization models for the pump scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(1), pages 1-19.
    10. Judy Lawrence & Dorothee Quade & Julia Becker, 2014. "Integrating the effects of flood experience on risk perception with responses to changing climate risk," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(3), pages 1773-1794, December.
    11. Luciano Raso & Jan Kwakkel & Jos Timmermans, 2019. "Assessing the Capacity of Adaptive Policy Pathways to Adapt on Time by Mapping Trigger Values to Their Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Przemysław Średziński & Martyna Świętochowska & Kamil Świętochowski & Joanna Gwoździej-Mazur, 2022. "Analysis of the Use of the PV Installation in the Power Supply of the Water Pumping Station," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Sierra C. Woodruff, 2016. "Planning for an unknowable future: uncertainty in climate change adaptation planning," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 445-459, December.
    14. Hsu-Shih Shih, 2016. "A Mixed-Data Evaluation in Group TOPSIS with Differentiated Decision Power," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 537-565, May.
    15. Fluixá-Sanmartín, Javier & Escuder-Bueno, Ignacio & Morales-Torres, Adrián & Castillo-Rodríguez, Jesica Tamara, 2020. "Comprehensive decision-making approach for managing time dependent dam risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    16. Pieter Bloemen & Tim Reeder & Chris Zevenbergen & Jeroen Rijke & Ashley Kingsborough, 2018. "Lessons learned from applying adaptation pathways in flood risk management and challenges for the further development of this approach," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 1083-1108, October.
    17. Babaeian, Fariba & Delavar, Majid & Morid, Saeed & Srinivasan, Raghavan, 2021. "Robust climate change adaptation pathways in agricultural water management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    18. Abraham Park & Chen Yu Chang, 2013. "Impacts of Construction Events on the Project Equity Value of the Channel Tunnel Project," ERES eres2013_97, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    19. Matteo Giuliani & Andrea Castelletti, 2016. "Is robustness really robust? How different definitions of robustness impact decision-making under climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 409-424, April.
    20. Pham Thi Oanh & Makoto Tamura & Naoko Kumano & Quang Van Nguyen, 2020. "Cost-Benefit Analysis of Mixing Gray and Green Infrastructures to Adapt to Sea Level Rise in the Vietnamese Mekong River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2818-:d:1617941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.