IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2052-d1601204.html

Barriers to E-Tendering Implementation in the Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of a Decade and Beyond

Author

Listed:
  • Yusif Inusah

    (Civil Engineering Department, Akdeniz University, 07070 Antalya, Türkiye)

  • Aynur Kazaz

    (Civil Engineering Department, Akdeniz University, 07070 Antalya, Türkiye)

  • Serdar Ulubeyli

    (Civil Engineering Department, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, 67100 Zonguldak, Türkiye)

Abstract

This study addresses the scientific issue of the insufficient systematization of knowledge about the barriers to electronic tendering (E-Tendering) in the construction industry. This study is critical because it can potentially promote more effective, transparent, and environmentally friendly procurement practices, which can help with sustainable development. The key scientific goals of this study are to identify and categorize the barriers to E-Tendering adoption across six (6) geographical regions and to make recommendations to overcome the identified barriers. This research used a systematic literature review technique to identify these barriers from relevant scientific databases. This study identified and categorized the main obstacles to E-Tendering and grouped the barriers according to six geographical regions. Eight (8) significant barriers were common across six geographical locations. They are (1) Inadequate technical/ICT skilled personnel, (2) Inadequate data security, (3) Inadequate policy or uniform standard and Inadequate legal framework, (4) resistance to change, (5) Inadequate ICT and internet infrastructure, (6) High investment cost of implementation, (7) Lack of support, and (8) Technical challenges. Furthermore, this study identified 10 significant barriers to E-Tendering implementation in the construction industry. This study contributes to improving knowledge of these barriers. It contributes to creating policies that promote the long-term reform of procurement processes in the construction sector. This study also supports sustainable development goals by promoting more efficient, transparent, and environmentally friendly procurement processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yusif Inusah & Aynur Kazaz & Serdar Ulubeyli, 2025. "Barriers to E-Tendering Implementation in the Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of a Decade and Beyond," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-33, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2052-:d:1601204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2052/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2052/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Usman Musa & Mastura Jaafar & Faraziera Mohd Raslim, 2023. "E-procurement adoption in Nigeria: perceptions from the public sector employees," Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(3), pages 1130-1149, October.
    2. Zaruk Narsam Salifu & Clement Nangpiire & Abdul-Aziz Dawdi & Fatawu Yussif, 2023. "Assessing the Extent of Electronic Procurement Adoption Challenges in the Public Sector of Ghana," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 13(2), pages 72-78, March.
    3. Chau Kwong Wing, 1997. "The ranking of construction management journals," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 387-398.
    4. Kishor Vaidya & A. S. M. Sajeev & Guy Callender, 2006. "Critical factors that influence e-procurement implementation success in the public sector," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1/2), pages 70-99, March.
    5. Ajoy Ketan Sarangi & Rudra Prakash Pradhan, 2020. "ICT infrastructure and economic growth: a critical assessment and some policy implications," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 47(4), pages 363-383, December.
    6. Daniel Stockemer & Michael J. Wigginton, 2019. "Publishing in English or another language: An inclusive study of scholar’s language publication preferences in the natural, social and interdisciplinary sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(2), pages 645-652, February.
    7. Moath Al-Yahya & Martin Skitmore & Adrian Bridge & Madhav P. Nepal & David Cattell, 2018. "E-tendering readiness in construction: an a priori model," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(5), pages 608-638.
    8. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ngai, Eric W.T., 2008. "Adoption of e-procurement in Hong Kong: An empirical research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 159-175, May.
    9. Esra Ceviker Gurakar & Bedri Kamil Onur Tas, 2016. "Does Public E-Procurement Deliver What It Promises? Empirical Evidence from Turkey," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(11), pages 2669-2684, November.
    10. Joel R. Motaung & Portia Pearl Siyanda Sifolo, 2023. "Benefits and Barriers of Digital Procurement: Lessons from an Airport Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Moath Al-Yahya & Kriengsak Panuwatwanich, 2018. "Implementing e-tendering to improve the efficiency of public construction contract in Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(3), pages 267-294.
    12. Besnik Hajdari, 2018. "Technical Parts For Application E-Procurement in the Republic of Kosovo," Prizren Social Science Journal, SHIKS, vol. 2(1), pages 96-108, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suhaila Ali & Muhammad Amzar Ahmad & Norsyazwana Jenuwa & Farhan Md Dahlan & Norbaizura Abu Bakar & Noraini Md Zain, 2025. "Challenges in Adopting the E-Tendering System among Contractors in the Malaysian Construction Industry," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 8942-8953, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guan Luo & Carlos Serrão & Decui Liang & Yang Zhou, 2023. "A Relevance-Based Technology–Organisation–Environment Model of Critical Success Factors for Digital Procurement Adoption in Chinese Construction Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Ed Burton & David John Edwards & Chris Roberts & Nicholas Chileshe & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Delineating the Implications of Dispersing Teams and Teleworking in an Agile UK Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Sara Belisari & Daniele Binci & Andrea Appolloni, 2020. "E-Procurement Adoption: A Case Study about the Role of Two Italian Advisory Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Bacha, Radia & Gasmi, Farid, 2022. "The broadband diffusion process and its determinants in Algeria: A simultaneous estimation," TSE Working Papers 22-1309, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    5. Dumiso Siwawa & Dr. Mukelabai Mukelabai, 2025. "Assessing The Efficiency of Procurement-To-Pay Systems In Zambia's Nonprofit Organizations: A Case Study of Catholic Relief Services Zambia (CRS)," African Journal of Commercial Studies, African Journal of Commercial Studies, vol. 6(1).
    6. Toktaş-Palut, Peral & Baylav, Ecem & Teoman, Seyhan & Altunbey, Mustafa, 2014. "The impact of barriers and benefits of e-procurement on its adoption decision: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 77-90.
    7. Liu, Sihan, 2025. "Digital transformation–productivity nexus: Platform integration and enterprise performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Matúš Adamkovič & Michal Kentoš & Pavol Kačmár & Lenka Vargová & Gabriel Baník & Marcel Martončik, 2025. "The state of Slovak scientific literature published between 1993 and 2022: a bibliometric overview focused on social sciences and humanities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(10), pages 5571-5589, October.
    9. Dodi Hardinata & Auliyah Patih Hardinata, 2024. "Understanding with a Practical Perspective the Corruption Mode of Goods/Services Procurement in Indonesian Public Organizations," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 14(1), pages 20-30, January.
    10. Shuaitao Jiao & Qiubi Sun, 2021. "Digital Economic Development and Its Impact on Econimic Growth in China: Research Based on the Prespective of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Chong, Alain Yee-Loong & Ooi, Keng-Boon & Sohal, Amrik, 2009. "The relationship between supply chain factors and adoption of e-Collaboration tools: An empirical examination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 150-160, November.
    12. Matthieu Cisel & Pauline Antognelli & Nicolas Laudier, 2026. "Internationalization and online availability of doctoral research in France: contrasting scholarly fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 131(3), pages 1567-1590, March.
    13. Pradhan, Rudra P. & Arvin, Mak B. & Nair, Mahendhiran S. & Hall, John H. & Bennett, Sara E., 2021. "Sustainable economic development in India: The dynamics between financial inclusion, ICT development, and economic growth," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    14. Liliana Hawrysz & Magdalena Kludacz-Alessandri & Małgorzata Fiałkowska-Filipek, 2025. "Digital maturity in primary care facilities: assessing its influence on organisational commitment and job satisfaction," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 52(4), pages 461-478, December.
    15. Femilia Zahra & Muhammad Ikbal Abdullah & Muhammad Din & Mohammad Fadli & Hairul Azrin Haji Besar & Jati Kasuma Ali, 2024. "Investigating the Structural Model of Whistle Blowing System on Government Procurement Fraud: Examining Mediating Effect of Investigative Audit," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 302-309, October.
    16. Goodarzi, Shadi & Masini, Andrea & Aflaki, Sam & Fahimnia, Behnam, 2021. "Right information at the right time: Reevaluating the attitude–behavior gap in environmental technology adoption," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    17. Zhao Zhai & Ming Shan & Amos Darko & Albert P. C. Chan, 2021. "Corruption in Construction Projects: Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Macphersson Mutale & Bupe, 2024. "The Effects of Industry 4.0 Technologies on Supply Chain Management Performance: A Case Study of DHL Zambia," African Journal of Commercial Studies, African Journal of Commercial Studies, vol. 5(2).
    19. Maurizio Cavallari, 2023. "Organizational Determinants and Compliance Behavior to Shape Information Security Plan," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 12, November.
    20. Chen, Yang & Tao, Kan & Jiao, Wen & Yang, Dong, 2020. "Investigating the underlying social psychology of the innovation adoption in container trucking industry," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 259-270.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2052-:d:1601204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.