IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1951-d1599081.html

Sustainability Transition in the Visegrád Group: Shared Goals, Different Paths

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr M. Bolibok

    (Department of Economic Policy and Banking, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

  • Bartłomiej Zinczuk

    (Department of Management, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Plac Marii Curie-Sklodowskiej 5, 20-031 Lublin, Poland)

  • Anna Matras-Bolibok

    (Department of Microeconomics and Applied Economics, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Plac Marii Curie-Sklodowskiej 5, 20-031 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the sustainability performance trajectories of the Visegrád Group (V4) countries since their accession to the European Union. Given their shared historical, geopolitical, and socio-economic backgrounds, this study explores common evolutionary patterns and convergence within the sustainable development goal framework. This research employs the Kml3D non-parametric clustering algorithm and standard beta and sigma convergence tests. The analysis covers the 2004–2023 data sourced from the European Sustainable Development Report 2023/24 by the Sustainable Development Solutions Network. The findings demonstrate that while each country follows a distinct path, Czechia and Slovakia exhibit notable similarities in the evolution of individual sustainability dimensions. This underscores the influence of path dependence, institutional inertia, and cross-border policy coordination in sustainable development. The results also suggest that although the V4 countries generally converge in socio-economic and infrastructural dimensions of sustainability, divergence persists in education, gender equality, nature preservation, and institutional performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr M. Bolibok & Bartłomiej Zinczuk & Anna Matras-Bolibok, 2025. "Sustainability Transition in the Visegrád Group: Shared Goals, Different Paths," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-29, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1951-:d:1599081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1951/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1951/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sagan, Anna & Bryndova, Lucie & Kowalska-Bobko, Iwona & Smatana, Martin & Spranger, Anne & Szerencses, Viktoria & Webb, Erin & Gaal, Peter, 2022. "A reversal of fortune: Comparison of health system responses to COVID-19 in the Visegrad group during the early phases of the pandemic," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(5), pages 446-455.
    2. Idiano D’Adamo & Cristina Di Carlo & Massimo Gastaldi & Edouard Nicolas Rossi & Antonio Felice Uricchio, 2024. "Economic Performance, Environmental Protection and Social Progress: A Cluster Analysis Comparison towards Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Stefan Ćetković & Aron Buzogány, 2016. "Varieties of capitalism and clean energy transitions in the European Union: When renewable energy hits different economic logics," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 642-657, July.
    4. Genolini, Christophe & Alacoque, Xavier & Sentenac, Mariane & Arnaud, Catherine, 2015. "kml and kml3d: R Packages to Cluster Longitudinal Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 65(i04).
    5. Simone Pizzi & Francesco Rosati & Andrea Venturelli, 2021. "The determinants of business contribution to the 2030 Agenda: Introducing the SDG Reporting Score," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 404-421, January.
    6. Lucia Rocchi & Elena Ricciolini & Gianluca Massei & Luisa Paolotti & Antonio Boggia, 2022. "Towards the 2030 Agenda: Measuring the Progress of the European Union Countries through the SDGs Achievement Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Mats Braun, 2020. "Postfunctionalism, Identity and the Visegrad Group," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 925-940, July.
    8. Thomas Dyllick & Kai Hockerts, 2002. "Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 130-141, March.
    9. George H. Ionescu & Daniela Firoiu & Anca Tănasie & Tudor Sorin & Ramona Pîrvu & Alina Manta, 2020. "Assessing the Achievement of the SDG Targets for Health and Well-Being at EU Level by 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-38, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beata Bal-Domańska & Elżbieta Stańczyk & Mirosława Szewczyk, 2025. "Empirical Evidence on Pro-Environmental Activities of Companies in Times of Energy Transformation: A Case Study of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-24, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon S.M. Yuen & Calvin Cheng, 2023. "Sustainable E-Procurement Adoption and Practices in the Pandemic Era," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 53-68.
    2. Fatih Akbaş & Ferudun Kaya, 2022. "Investigation of Financial Performance Indicators Affecting Corporate Sustainability of Participation Banks," Journal of Finance Letters (Maliye ve Finans Yazıları), Maliye ve Finans Yazıları Yayıncılık Ltd. Şti., vol. 37(117), pages 159-176, April.
    3. Maria Björklund & Helena Forslund, 2019. "Challenges Addressed by Swedish Third-Party Logistics Providers Conducting Sustainable Logistics Business Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Merriam Haffar & Cory Searcy, 2018. "Target‐setting for ecological resilience: Are companies setting environmental sustainability targets in line with planetary thresholds?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1079-1092, November.
    5. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    6. Florentina Moisescu, 2025. "Sustainability and Financial Performance: Exploring the Interconnections Through the Accounting Perspective in Romania," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 250-257.
    7. Victor Tomaz de Oliveira & Denilson Teixeira & Antonio Boggia & Lucia Rocchi, 2025. "Performance Towards Sustainability: A Regional Assessment Supported by the Geographic Information Systems," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 8855-8869, December.
    8. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    9. Bert Scholtens & Feng‐Ching Kang, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: Evidence from Asian Economies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 95-112, March.
    10. Fabien Martinez, 2014. "Corporate strategy and the environment: towards a four-dimensional compatibility model for fostering green management decisions," Post-Print hal-02887618, HAL.
    11. Veronica Devenin & Constanza Bianchi, 2018. "Soccer fields? What for? Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility initiatives in the mining industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 866-879, September.
    12. Rentier, Gerrit & Lelieveldt, Herman & Kramer, Gert Jan, 2019. "Varieties of coal-fired power phase-out across Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 620-632.
    13. Tommaso Elli & Alessandra Spagnoli & Valeria Maria Iannilli, 2024. "Mapping Service-Based Retailing to Improve Sustainability Practices in the Fashion Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Tariq Elrazaz & Ahmed Shaker Samaan & Moataz Elmassri, 2024. "Sustainable development goals: Sustainability reporting challenges in the United Arab Emirates context," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3100-3114, August.
    15. Nurisyal Muhamad & Sofiah Md Auzair & Amizawati Mohd Amir & Md Daud Ismail, 2016. "Measuring Sustainability Performance Measurement System," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 3(12), pages 182-199, JUNE.
    16. Frank Fogarty & Amy Villamagna & Allen Whitley & Kelly Pippins, 2013. "The Capacity to Endure: Following Nature’s Lead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-15, June.
    17. Caetani, Alberto Pavlick & Ferreira, Luciano & Borenstein, Denis, 2016. "Development of an integrated decision-making method for an oil refinery restructuring in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 197-210.
    18. Daniel Taylor & Katie Chong & Mirjam Röder, 2024. "Designing biomass policy: The political economy of renewable energy for net zero," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), March.
    19. Justyna Patalas-Maliszewska & Hanna Łosyk, 2020. "An Approach to Assessing Sustainability in the Development of a Manufacturing Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Yanfang Zhang & Mushang Lee, 2019. "A Hybrid Model for Addressing the Relationship between Financial Performance and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1951-:d:1599081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.