IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1793-d1595698.html

Sustainable Procedures for the Recycling of Waste Building Materials: The Creative Recycling of Window Frames

Author

Listed:
  • Gianni Di Giovanni

    (Department of Civil, Building-Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of L’Aquila, Via Giovanni Gronchi 18—Pile Industrial Zone, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Eleonora Laurini

    (Department of Civil, Building-Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of L’Aquila, Via Giovanni Gronchi 18—Pile Industrial Zone, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

Abstract

Upcycling is identified as a process of the transformation of waste materials to which it is possible to give a value of artistic or environmental quality. To date, the greatest use of upcycling can be found in the design, art and fashion sectors. As in other sectors, one of the biggest challenges in the construction industry in the future is the search for new ways to reuse discarded materials. In this sense, upcycling is a new technique for the recovery of removed waste but with a much lower use of energy and resources than the regeneration of recycled material. With respect to these issues, the aim of this paper is to present the results of a design experimentation aimed at defining methodologies and tools for the reuse of building components from the decommissioning or renovation processes of existing buildings, with an approach that integrates both the disassembling and the re-assembling of construction elements, in line with the sustainable development and climate neutrality goals that the European Union aims to achieve by 2050. The methodology used made use of a field experiment by means of the creation of a prototype that made it possible to evaluate the results of the study which, if on the one hand made it possible to define an appropriate procedure for upcycling, on the other hand highlighted how these procedures save energy and reduce the emission of CO 2 in the environment. In this specific case, the experimentation gave the following results: energy savings 2038.92 kWh; CO 2 reduction 641.80 kg compared to a similar intervention from scratch. Therefore, the definition of a replicable and scalable operational process for the upcycling activity applied to architecture allows, by means of the reuse of those building materials and construction elements that still have a useful life, and which can, therefore, be used in the field of architecture, for a profitable contribution to the development of sustainable procedures in the field of architecture and the circular economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianni Di Giovanni & Eleonora Laurini, 2025. "Sustainable Procedures for the Recycling of Waste Building Materials: The Creative Recycling of Window Frames," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1793-:d:1595698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1793/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1793/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcel C. Hollander & Conny A. Bakker & Erik Jan Hultink, 2017. "Product Design in a Circular Economy: Development of a Typology of Key Concepts and Terms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(3), pages 517-525, June.
    2. Miguel Ángel Aguilar-Jurado & Pedro Gil-Madrona & Juan Francisco Ortega-Dato & David Zamorano-García, 2019. "Effects of an Educational Glass Recycling Program against Environmental Pollution in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Surajit Bag & Muhammad Sabbir Rahman & Gautam Srivastava & Peter Kilbourn & Nishikant Mishra, 2024. "Buyer–supplier partnerships and circular economy performance in food supply chains: Serial mediation by commitment contract and innovation performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1247-1264, February.
    2. Alessio Franconi & Fabrizio Ceschin & David Peck, 2022. "Structuring Circular Objectives and Design Strategies for the Circular Economy: A Multi-Hierarchical Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Yousef Elbaz & Aman Mwafy & Hilal El-Hassan & Tamer El-Maaddawy, 2025. "Advancements in Characterization and Potential Structural Seismic Performance of Alkali-Activated Concrete Incorporating Crumb Rubber: A State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-43, July.
    4. Nancy Bocken & Lars Strupeit & Katherine Whalen & Julia Nußholz, 2019. "A Review and Evaluation of Circular Business Model Innovation Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Deborah Sumter & Jotte de Koning & Conny Bakker & Ruud Balkenende, 2020. "Circular Economy Competencies for Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Torsten Hummen & Stefanie Hellweg & Ramin Roshandel, 2023. "Optimizing Lifespan of Circular Products: A Generic Dynamic Programming Approach for Energy-Using Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-27, September.
    7. Carolina Castaldi, 2021. "Sustainable innovation and intellectual property rights: friends, foes or perfect strangers?," LEM Papers Series 2021/11, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    8. Tally Katz‐Gerro & Jordi López Sintas, 2019. "Mapping circular economy activities in the European Union: Patterns of implementation and their correlates in small and medium‐sized enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 485-496, May.
    9. Daniela M. Salvioni & Alex Almici, 2020. "Transitioning Toward a Circular Economy: The Impact of Stakeholder Engagement on Sustainability Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.
    10. Chukwuebuka C. Okafor & Juliet C. Ibekwe & Valentine E. Nnadi & Festus A. Otunomo & Charles C. Ajaero, 2026. "A Review on Trends, Challenges, and Strategies for Circular Economy in Nigerian Construction," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(1), pages 1260-1304, February.
    11. Kumar Mangla, Sachin & Börühan, Gülmüş & Ersoy, Pervin & Kazancoglu, Yigit & Song, Malin, 2021. "Impact of information hiding on circular food supply chains in business-to-business context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1-18.
    12. Meghana Desai & Anuli Njoku & Lillian Nimo-Sefah, 2022. "Comparing Environmental Policies to Reduce Pharmaceutical Pollution and Address Disparities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Johannes Matschewsky, 2019. "Unintended Circularity?—Assessing a Product-Service System for its Potential Contribution to a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    14. Ángela Triguero & Lourdes Moreno‐Mondéjar & David Córcoles, 2025. "The Importance of the Eco‐Innovation, Knowledge Network and the Geographical Dimension in the Adoption of Circular Economy Business Models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10903-10924, December.
    15. Cai, Ya-Jun & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Feng, Lipan & Li, Yongjian, 2022. "Producer's choice of design-for-environment under environmental taxation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 532-544.
    16. Friedrich A. Halstenberg & Kai Lindow & Rainer Stark, 2019. "Leveraging Circular Economy through a Methodology for Smart Service Systems Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-36, June.
    17. Akhtar, Pervaiz & Ghouri, Arsalan Mujahid & Ashraf, Aniqa & Lim, Jia Jia & Khan, Naveed R & Ma, Shuang, 2024. "Smart product platforming powered by AI and generative AI: Personalization for the circular economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    18. Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & De Camargo Fiorini, Paula & Wong, Christina W.Y. & Jugend, Daniel & Lopes De Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Roman Pais Seles, Bruno Michel & Paula Pinheiro, Marco Anto, 2020. "First-mover firms in the transition towards the sharing economy in metallic natural resource-intensive industries: Implications for the circular economy and emerging industry 4.0 technologies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    19. Emilia Ingemarsdotter & Ella Jamsin & Gerd Kortuem & Ruud Balkenende, 2019. "Circular Strategies Enabled by the Internet of Things—A Framework and Analysis of Current Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-37, October.
    20. Wang, Jason X. & Burke, Haydn & Zhang, Abraham, 2022. "Overcoming barriers to circular product design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1793-:d:1595698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.