IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1546-d1590402.html

Study on the Influence of the Ecological Environment on the Subjective Well-Being of Farmers Around Nature Reserves: Mediating Effects Based on Environmental Cognition

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Chen

    (College of Economic and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110086, China)

  • Boyang Cao

    (College of Economic and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110086, China)

  • Xinning Pan

    (College of Economic and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110086, China)

  • Yang Wang

    (College of Economic and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110086, China)

  • Dan He

    (College of Economic and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110086, China)

Abstract

Improving the subjective well-being of farmers is the goal of rural revitalization. Based on the data from a survey of 956 farmers from 44 villages in six nature reserves in Liaoning province and the least squares regression model, this paper studies the impact of ecological environment quality on the subjective well-being of farmers around nature reserves and analyzes the mediating role of environmental cognition in the impact of ecological environment quality on the well-being of farmers around nature reserves. The results show that in terms of ecological environment quality, both the natural environment and the social environment have a significant positive impact on the subjective well-being of farmers around nature reserves. For every 1% improvement in the following aspects, the subjective well-being of rural households increases as follows: air quality: 25%, soil and vegetation conditions: 46%, wildlife population: 27%, medical service facilities: 23%, basic living facilities: 30%, environmental beautification facilities: 33%. Environmental cognition plays a mediating role between ecological environment quality and farmers’ subjective well-being. The influence of the natural environment and social environment on the subjective well-being of farmers outside nature reserves is higher than that inside nature reserves. This paper enriches the research on subjective well-being to a certain extent, analyzes the mechanism of the ecological environment’s influence on farmers’ subjective well-being, and provides theoretical reference for further improving farmers’ subjective well-being and promoting ecological civilization construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Chen & Boyang Cao & Xinning Pan & Yang Wang & Dan He, 2025. "Study on the Influence of the Ecological Environment on the Subjective Well-Being of Farmers Around Nature Reserves: Mediating Effects Based on Environmental Cognition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1546-:d:1590402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1546/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1546/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salauddin Tauseef, 2022. "Can Money Buy Happiness? Subjective Wellbeing and Its Relationship with Income, Relative Income, Monetary and Non-monetary Poverty in Bangladesh," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1073-1098, March.
    2. Hulin Pan, 2023. "Effect of the ecological environment on the residents’ happiness: the mechanism and an evidence from Zhejiang Province of China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2716-2734, March.
    3. Min Jee Nikki Han & Mi Jeong Kim, 2019. "Green Environments and Happiness Level in Housing Areas toward a Sustainable Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Jingjing Wang & Decai Tang, 2023. "Air Pollution, Environmental Protection Tax and Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Felix Requena, 2016. "Rural–Urban Living and Level of Economic Development as Factors in Subjective Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(2), pages 693-708, September.
    6. Yu Liu & Ke Zhu & Rong-Lin Li & Yang Song & Zhi-Jiang Zhang, 2021. "Air Pollution Impairs Subjective Happiness by Damaging Their Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-9, September.
    7. Thomas Markussen & Maria Fibæk & Finn Tarp & Nguyen Do Anh Tuan, 2018. "Erratum to: The Happy Farmer: Self-Employment and Subjective Well-Being in Rural Vietnam," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 1637-1637, August.
    8. Kaiyu Hua & Xinsheng Pang, 2024. "Investigation into the Factors Affecting the Green Consumption Behavior of China Rural Residents in the Context of Dual Carbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Junpeng & Ma, Wanglin & Gong, Binlei, 2023. "Market participation and subjective well-being of maize farmers," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 941-960.
    2. František Petrovič & Patrik Maturkanič, 2022. "Urban-Rural Dichotomy of Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Bhuiyan, Muhammad Faress & Ivlevs, Artjoms, 2019. "Micro-entrepreneurship and subjective well-being: Evidence from rural Bangladesh," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 625-645.
    4. Yu-Chuan Chen & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang & Tai-Yu Lin, 2023. "Sustainable Development, Government Efficiency, and People’s Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1549-1578, April.
    5. Fan, Shuting & Wang, Can, 2024. "Transition finance facilitates lower-cost achievement of climate targets: A case study of China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 617-629.
    6. Tadashi Hirai, 2025. "The validity of subjective assessments of deprivation: Can it be true that poor people are happier than those who are well off?," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Aparicio, Sebastian & Audretsch, David & Noguera, Maria & Urbano, David, 2022. "Can female entrepreneurs boost social mobility in developing countries? An institutional analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Binhui Wei & Chunkai Zhao & Mingzhong Luo, 2025. "Returning Entrepreneurship and Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from Migrant Worker Households in Rural China," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1-45, March.
    9. Qianqian Liu & Guanpeng Dong & Wenzhong Zhang & Jiaming Li, 2022. "The Influence of Air Pollution on Happiness and Willingness to Pay for Clean Air in the Bohai Rim Area of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, May.
    10. Stephen Prah & Bright Owusu Asante & John N. Ng’ombe, 2026. "Who Manages Better? Gendered Perspectives on Food Security and Subjective Wellbeing in Ghana," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 1-34, February.
    11. repec:rjr:romjef:v::y:2025:i:4:p:5-20 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Cristina Bernini & Silvia Emili & Federica Galli, 2021. "Does urbanization matter in the expenditure‐happiness nexus?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(6), pages 1403-1428, December.
    13. Mary Abed Al Ahad, 2024. "Air Pollution Reduces the Individuals’ Life Satisfaction Through Health Impairment," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 19(3), pages 1049-1073, June.
    14. Mostafa E. Shahen & Shibly Shahrier & Koji Kotani, 2019. "Happiness, Generativity and Social Preferences in a Developing Country: A Possibility of Future Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Finn Tarp, 2018. "Vietnam: The dragon that rose from the ashes," WIDER Working Paper Series 126, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    16. Dongliang Yang & Xiangheng Liu & Zhichao Ren & Mingna Li, 2022. "Relation between Noise Pollution and Life Satisfaction Based on the 2019 Chinese Social Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    17. Tao Xia & Elias G. Carayannis & Stavros Sindakis & Saloome Showkat & Nikos Kanellos, 2024. "Technology transfer for sustainable rural development: evidence from homestead withdrawal with compensation in Chengdu–Chongqing," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 303-333, February.
    18. Hugo Briseño & Guillermo Estefani & Alejandra Núñez-Acosta & Manuel Soto-Pérez, 2022. "Urban Risks and Their Influence on Subjective Well-being Around the World," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1617-1636, April.
    19. Bednarik, Zuzana, "undated". "The impact of health disparities on the subjective well-being in rural communities," NCR-Stat Discussion Papers 339129, North Central Regional Center for Rural Development (NCRCRD).
    20. Long Yang & Haiyang Lu & Meng Li, 2023. "Multidimensional Inequality and Subjective Well-Being in China: A Generalized Ordered Logit Model Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 1021-1052, February.
    21. Yi Feng & Yu Feng & Ziyang Liu, 2025. "Influencing Factors of Residents’ Green Perception Under Urban–Rural Differences: A Socio-Ecological Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-36, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1546-:d:1590402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.