IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p836-d1572742.html

Research on the Level of High-Quality Urban Development Based on Big Data Evaluation System: A Study of 151 Prefecture-Level Cities in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiujun Qin

    (School of Public Administration, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Xiaolei Qin

    (School of Public Administration, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

Abstract

China’s rapid urbanization has exposed a growing gap between economic growth and development quality, highlighting the urgent need for high-quality urban advancement. This study constructed a comprehensive evaluation system to effectively measure urban growth quality, integrating five key dimensions: innovation, coordination, greenness, openness, and shared development, enhanced by big data analytics. Analyzing data from 151 Chinese cities between 2017 and 2021, we found a consistent improvement in urban development quality and a gradual narrowing of regional disparities. However, significant differences persist between eastern and western cities, with innovation emerging as the primary driver for enhancing urban development quality. These findings suggest that China should intensify investment in innovation, broaden openness, and focus on elevating overall urban development quality while bridging regional gaps.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiujun Qin & Xiaolei Qin, 2025. "Research on the Level of High-Quality Urban Development Based on Big Data Evaluation System: A Study of 151 Prefecture-Level Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:836-:d:1572742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/836/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/836/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Xiaopeng & Hao, Gang & Zhang, Zhipeng & Xia, Chengyi, 2021. "Evolution of cooperation in heterogeneously stochastic interactions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Hyunyoung Choi & Hal Varian, 2012. "Predicting the Present with Google Trends," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 88(s1), pages 2-9, June.
    3. Alberto Cavallo, 2018. "Scraped Data and Sticky Prices," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 100(1), pages 105-119, March.
    4. Flaherty, Eoin & Sturm, Tristan & Farries, Elizabeth, 2022. "The conspiracy of Covid-19 and 5G: Spatial analysis fallacies in the age of data democratization," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liran Einav & Jonathan Levin, 2014. "The Data Revolution and Economic Analysis," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24.
    2. Ademmer, Martin & Beckmann, Joscha & Bode, Eckhardt & Boysen-Hogrefe, Jens & Funke, Manuel & Hauber, Philipp & Heidland, Tobias & Hinz, Julian & Jannsen, Nils & Kooths, Stefan & Söder, Mareike & Stame, 2021. "Big Data in der makroökonomischen Analyse," Kieler Beiträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik 32, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    3. POPESCU Mioara, 2015. "Construction Of Economic Indicators Using Internet Searches," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 6(1), pages 25-31.
    4. Francesco Capozza & Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2021. "Studying Information Acquisition in the Field: A Practical Guide and Review," CEBI working paper series 21-15, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    5. Kučerová, Zuzana & Pakši, Daniel & Koňařík, Vojtěch, 2024. "Macroeconomic fundamentals and attention: What drives european consumers’ inflation expectations?," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(1).
    6. David W Carter & Scott Crosson & Christopher Liese, 2015. "Nowcasting Intraseasonal Recreational Fishing Harvest with Internet Search Volume," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    7. David H Chae & Sean Clouston & Mark L Hatzenbuehler & Michael R Kramer & Hannah L F Cooper & Sacoby M Wilson & Seth I Stephens-Davidowitz & Robert S Gold & Bruce G Link, 2015. "Association between an Internet-Based Measure of Area Racism and Black Mortality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    8. C. Douglas Swearingen & Joseph T. Ripberger, 2014. "Google Insights and U.S. Senate Elections: Does Search Traffic Provide a Valid Measure of Public Attention to Political Candidates?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 95(3), pages 882-893, September.
    9. Nathan, Max & Rosso, Anna, 2014. "Mapping information economy businesses with big data: findings from the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60615, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Ishani Chaudhuri & Parthajit Kayal, 2022. "Predicting Power of Ticker Search Volume in Indian Stock Market," Working Papers 2022-214, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    11. Yang, Xin & Pan, Bing & Evans, James A. & Lv, Benfu, 2015. "Forecasting Chinese tourist volume with search engine data," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 386-397.
    12. Hakan Yilmazkuday, 2025. "Artificial intelligence and labor markets: evidence from google trends," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 49(4), pages 1078-1093, December.
    13. Pulkit Sharma & Achut Manandhar & Patrick Thomson & Jacob Katuva & Robert Hope & David A. Clifton, 2019. "Combining Multi-Modal Statistics for Welfare Prediction Using Deep Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-15, November.
    14. Zhou, Chen & Zhu, Yuying & Zhao, Dawei & Xia, Chengyi, 2024. "An evolutionary trust game model with group reputation within the asymmetric population," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    15. John M. Abowd & Ian M. Schmutte & William Sexton & Lars Vilhuber, 2019. "Suboptimal Provision of Privacy and Statistical Accuracy When They are Public Goods," Papers 1906.09353, arXiv.org.
    16. Bentzen, Jeanet Sinding, 2021. "In crisis, we pray: Religiosity and the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 541-583.
    17. Zhou, Meng & Yang, Yanlong & Xiang, Shuwen, 2025. "Effect of community learning mechanism on cooperation in conflict societies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    18. Jesse T. Richman & Ryan J. Roberts, 2023. "Assessing Spurious Correlations in Big Search Data," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, February.
    19. Christopher Hansman & Harrison Hong & Áureo de Paula & Vishal Singh, 2020. "A Sticky-Price View of Hoarding," NBER Working Papers 27051, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Chung-Yi Lin & Shu-Yi Liaw & Chao-Chun Chen & Mao-Yuan Pai & Yuh-Min Chen, 2017. "A computer-based approach for analyzing consumer demands in electronic word-of-mouth," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(3), pages 225-242, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:836-:d:1572742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.